Literature DB >> 31125841

The Effect of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Pathway Implementation on Abdominal-Based Microvascular Breast Reconstruction.

Banafsheh Sharif-Askary1, Eliza Hompe1, Gloria Broadwater2, Rachel Anolik3, Scott T Hollenbeck4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) pathways are becoming the standard of care in microvascular breast reconstruction, evidence supporting their use is limited or based on small sample sizes. We hypothesized that improvements in postoperative outcomes would persist when examining the largest cohort of patients undergoing abdominal-based microvascular breast reconstruction, to date.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were retrospectively reviewed for 276 consecutive patients who underwent abdominal-based free flap breast reconstruction before and after ERAS implementation (pre-ERAS, n = 138 patients; post-ERAS, n = 138 patients). Primary outcomes were postoperative opioid use measured in oral morphine equivalents (OMEs), median hospital length of stay (LOS) in days, and incidence of postoperative complications.
RESULTS: Postoperative opioid requirements were significantly lower in the post-ERAS cohort compared with the pre-ERAS cohort (57.3 OME, [interquartile range 20.0-115.5] versus 297.3 OME [interquartile range 138.6-437.7], P < 0.0001). There was no significant difference in hospital LOS when controlling for variables that differed between the groups. In addition, there were no differences in the rate of postoperative complications, return to operating room, or readmission after ERAS pathway implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: ERAS improves specific aspects of recovery for patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction, most notably postoperative opioid use. Patient selection and a shift toward less invasive procedures may explain a nonsignificant impact on hospital LOS.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast reconstruction; ERAS; Enhanced Recovery after Surgery; Fast-track surgery; Microvascular breast reconstruction

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31125841     DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2019.04.062

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Res        ISSN: 0022-4804            Impact factor:   2.192


  4 in total

Review 1.  Enhanced Recovery Pathways for Flap-Based Reconstruction: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yan Yu Tan; Frank Liaw; Robert Warner; Simon Myers; Ali Ghanem
Journal:  Aesthetic Plast Surg       Date:  2021-04-05       Impact factor: 2.326

Review 2.  Clinical guidelines on perioperative management strategies for enhanced recovery after lung surgery.

Authors:  Shugeng Gao; Serena Barello; Liang Chen; Chun Chen; Guowei Che; Kaican Cai; Roberto Crisci; Antonio D'Andrilli; Andrea Droghetti; Xiangning Fu; Paolo Albino Ferrari; Hiran C Fernando; Di Ge; Guendalina Graffigna; Yunchao Huang; Jian Hu; Wenjie Jiao; Gening Jiang; Xiaofei Li; Hui Li; Shanqing Li; Lunxu Liu; Haitao Ma; Dongchun Ma; Guillermo Martinez; Giulio Maurizi; Kevin Phan; Kun Qiao; Majed Refai; Erino A Rendina; Guoguang Shao; Jianfei Shen; Hui Tian; Luca Voltolini; Jacopo Vannucci; Camilla Vanni; Qingchen Wu; Shidong Xu; Fenglei Yu; Song Zhao; Peng Zhang; Lanjun Zhang; Xiuyi Zhi; Chengchu Zhu; Calvin Ng; Alan D L Sihoe; Anthony M H Ho
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2019-12

3.  Gender-affirming Phalloplasty: A Postoperative Protocol for Success.

Authors:  William J Rifkin; David A Daar; Courtney N Cripps; Ginger Mars; Lee C Zhao; Jamie P Levine; Rachel Bluebond-Langner
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2022-06-20

4.  Positive effects of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

Authors:  N Gort; B G I van Gaal; H J P Tielemans; D J O Ulrich; S Hummelink
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2021-08-20       Impact factor: 4.380

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.