| Literature DB >> 31125635 |
Edward F Pace-Schott1, Marlissa C Amole2, Tatjana Aue3, Michela Balconi4, Lauren M Bylsma2, Hugo Critchley5, Heath A Demaree6, Bruce H Friedman7, Anne Elizabeth Kotynski Gooding6, Olivia Gosseries8, Tanja Jovanovic9, Lauren A J Kirby10, Kasia Kozlowska11, Steven Laureys8, Leroy Lowe12, Kelsey Magee6, Marie-France Marin13, Amanda R Merner6, Jennifer L Robinson14, Robert C Smith15, Derek P Spangler16, Mark Van Overveld17, Michael B VanElzakker18.
Abstract
The role of peripheral physiology in the experience of emotion has been debated since the 19th century following the seminal proposal by William James that somatic responses to stimuli determine subjective emotion. Subsequent views have integrated the forebrain's ability to initiate, represent and simulate such physiological events. Modern affective neuroscience envisions an interacting network of "bottom-up" and "top-down" signaling in which the peripheral (PNS) and central nervous systems both receive and generate the experience of emotion. "Feelings" serves as a term for the perception of these physical changes whether emanating from actual somatic events or from the brain's representation of such. "Interoception" has come to represent the brain's receipt and representation of these actual and "virtual" somatic changes that may or may not enter conscious awareness but, nonetheless, influence feelings. Such information can originate from diverse sources including endocrine, immune and gastrointestinal systems as well as the PNS. We here examine physiological feelings from diverse perspectives including current and historical theories, evolution, neuroanatomy and physiology, development, regulatory processes, pathology and linguistics.Entities:
Keywords: Autonomic nervous system; Emotion; Emotion regulation; Feelings; Insula; Interoception; Somatic markers
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31125635 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.05.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurosci Biobehav Rev ISSN: 0149-7634 Impact factor: 8.989