Literature DB >> 31125326

Effect of Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse on Training Load Volume in Resistance Exercises.

Victor J Bastos-Silva1, Jonato Prestes2, Amandio A R Geraldes1.   

Abstract

Bastos-Silva, VJ, Prestes, J, and Geraldes, AAR. Effect of carbohydrate mouth rinse on training load volume in resistance exercises. J Strength Cond Res 33(6): 1654-1658, 2019-The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of carbohydrate (CHO) mouth rinse on training load volume (TLV-number of repetitions × load lifted [kg]) on 2 resistance exercises: leg press (LP) and bench press (BP). Twelve recreational resistance trained males were recruited. Subjects were assessed for 1 repetition maximum (1RM) and muscular endurance (ME) in LP and BP. Muscular endurance was determined by the maximum number of repetitions performed to volitional fatigue, with a load equal to 80% of 1RM. Exercises were performed on separate days (72 hours apart) under 3 experimental conditions: control (CONT), CHO (25 ml with 6.4% of maltodextrin), and placebo (juice without CHO [PLA]). Carbohydrate and PLA were used immediately before each exercise. There was no significant difference between conditions for the number of repetitions (CHO = 13.5 ± 4.8; PLA = 11.5 ± 4.4; CONT = 12.4 ± 4.4, p = 0.68) nor TLV (CHO = 2006.7 ± 825.2 kg; PLA = 1712.5 ± 772.9 kg; CONT = 1817.1 ± 672.6 kg, p = 0.99) in LP. However, CHO increased both repetitions (CHO = 8.2 ± 1.6; PLA = 7.1 ± 2.4; CONT = 6.8 ± 1.8, p = 0.002) and TLV (CHO = 557.1 ± 155.4 kg; PLA = 495.9 ± 206.1 kg; CONT = 476.1 ± 175.3 kg, p = 0.035) compared with CON in BP. Thus, a CHO mouth rinse increases BP performance in trained men, suggesting an interesting strategy to be used by experienced resistance training practitioners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31125326     DOI: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Strength Cond Res        ISSN: 1064-8011            Impact factor:   3.775


  6 in total

Review 1.  A Narrative Review of Current Concerns and Future Perspectives of the Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse Effects on Exercise Performance.

Authors:  Vitor de Salles Painelli; Cayque Brietzke; Paulo Estevão Franco-Alvarenga; Raul Canestri; Ítalo Vinícius; Flávio Oliveira Pires
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2022-05-13

2.  Different Doses of Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse Have No Effect on Exercise Performance in Resistance Trained Women.

Authors:  Raci Karayigit; Scott C Forbes; Alireza Naderi; Darren G Candow; Ulas C Yildirim; Firat Akca; Dicle Aras; Burak C Yasli; Aysegul Sisman; Ahmet Mor; Mojtaba Kaviani
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Carbohydrate Mouth Rinse Increases High but Not Low Intensity Repetitions to Failure in Resistance-Trained Males.

Authors:  Raci Karayigit; Mustafa Can Eser; Fatih Gur; Cengizhan Sari; Ladislav Cepicka; Tomasz Gabrys
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 5.717

4.  Maltodextrin-Based Carbohydrate Oral Rinsing and Exercise Performance: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Claudia Hartley; Amelia Carr; Steven J Bowe; Wender L P Bredie; Russell S J Keast
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2022-03-03       Impact factor: 11.928

5.  Carbohydrate mouth rinsing does not affect 6-min walk test performance and blood glucose responses in older adults.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Evans; Terrence Brophy; Matthew R Braswell; Joshua Boyle; G Keith Harris; Ruth H Watkins; Stephen P Bailey
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-06-26       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Nutritional Recommendations for Physique Athletes.

Authors:  Brandon M Roberts; Eric R Helms; Eric T Trexler; Peter J Fitschen
Journal:  J Hum Kinet       Date:  2020-01-31       Impact factor: 2.193

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.