Tessa Adzemovic1, Thomas Murray, Peter Jenkins, Julie Ottosen, Uroghupatei Iyegha, Krishnan Raghavendran, Lena M Napolitano, Mark R Hemmila, Jonathan Gipson, Pauline Park, Christopher J Tignanelli. 1. From the University of Michigan Medical School (T.A.), Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of Biostatistics (T.M.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Department of Surgery (P.J.), Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana; Department of Surgery (J.O., C.J.T.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota; Department of Surgery (J.O., J.G.P., C.J.T.), North Memorial Health Hospital, Robbinsdale, Minnesota, Department of Surgery (U.I.), Regions Hospital, St. Paul, Minnesota; Department of Surgery (K.R., L.M.N., M.R.H., P.P.), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; and Institute for Health Informatics (C.J.T.), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Interfacility transfer of patients from Level III/IV to Level I/II (tertiary) trauma centers has been associated with improved outcomes. However, little data are available classifying the specific subsets of patients that derive maximal benefit from transfer to a tertiary trauma center. Drawbacks to transfer include increased secondary overtriage. Here, we ask which injury patterns are associated with improved survival following interfacility transfer. METHODS: Data from the National Trauma Data Bank was utilized. Inclusion criteria were adults (≥16 years). Patients with Injury Severity Score of 10 or less or those who arrived with no signs of life were excluded. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those admitted to a Level III/IV trauma center versus those transferred into a tertiary trauma center. Multiple imputation was performed for missing values, and propensity scores were generated based on demographics, injury patterns, and disease severity. Using propensity score-stratified Cox proportional hazards regression, the hazard ratio for time to death was estimated. RESULTS: Twelve thousand five hundred thirty-four (5.2%) were admitted to Level III/IV trauma centers, and 227,315 (94.8%) were transferred to a tertiary trauma center. Patients transferred to a tertiary trauma center had reduced mortality (hazard ratio, 0.69; p < 0.001). We identified that patients with traumatic brain injury with Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 13, pelvic fracture, penetrating mechanism, solid organ injury, great vessel injury, respiratory distress, and tachycardia benefited from interfacility transfer to a tertiary trauma center. In this sample, 56.8% of the patients benefitted from transfer. Among those not transferred, 49.5% would have benefited from being transferred. CONCLUSION: Interfacility transfer is associated with a survival benefit for specific patients. These data support implementation of minimum evidence-based criteria for interfacility transfer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management, Level IV.
BACKGROUND: Interfacility transfer of patients from Level III/IV to Level I/II (tertiary) trauma centers has been associated with improved outcomes. However, little data are available classifying the specific subsets of patients that derive maximal benefit from transfer to a tertiary trauma center. Drawbacks to transfer include increased secondary overtriage. Here, we ask which injury patterns are associated with improved survival following interfacility transfer. METHODS: Data from the National Trauma Data Bank was utilized. Inclusion criteria were adults (≥16 years). Patients with Injury Severity Score of 10 or less or those who arrived with no signs of life were excluded. Patients were divided into two cohorts: those admitted to a Level III/IV trauma center versus those transferred into a tertiary trauma center. Multiple imputation was performed for missing values, and propensity scores were generated based on demographics, injury patterns, and disease severity. Using propensity score-stratified Cox proportional hazards regression, the hazard ratio for time to death was estimated. RESULTS: Twelve thousand five hundred thirty-four (5.2%) were admitted to Level III/IV trauma centers, and 227,315 (94.8%) were transferred to a tertiary trauma center. Patients transferred to a tertiary trauma center had reduced mortality (hazard ratio, 0.69; p < 0.001). We identified that patients with traumatic brain injury with Glasgow Coma Scale score less than 13, pelvic fracture, penetrating mechanism, solid organ injury, great vessel injury, respiratory distress, and tachycardia benefited from interfacility transfer to a tertiary trauma center. In this sample, 56.8% of the patients benefitted from transfer. Among those not transferred, 49.5% would have benefited from being transferred. CONCLUSION: Interfacility transfer is associated with a survival benefit for specific patients. These data support implementation of minimum evidence-based criteria for interfacility transfer. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic/Care Management, Level IV.
Authors: Claudia P Orlas; Juan Pablo Herrera-Escobar; Cheryl K Zogg; José J Serna; Juan J Meléndez; Alexandra Gómez; Diana Martínez; Michael W Parra; Alberto F García; Fernando Rosso; Luis Fernando Pino; Adolfo Gonzalez; Carlos A Ordoñez Journal: World J Surg Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Avital Yohann; Yonasi Chise; Chiphatso Manjolo; Laura N Purcell; Jared Gallaher; Anthony Charles Journal: World J Surg Date: 2022-10-14 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Peter C Jenkins; Lava Timsina; Patrick Murphy; Christopher Tignanelli; Daniel N Holena; Mark R Hemmila; Craig Newgard Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 13.787
Authors: Claire R L van den Driessche; Charlie A Sewalt; Jan C van Ditshuizen; Lisa Stocker; Michiel H J Verhofstad; Esther M M Van Lieshout; Dennis Den Hartog Journal: Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg Date: 2021-09-29 Impact factor: 2.374
Authors: Michael G Usher; Christopher J Tignanelli; Brian Hilliard; Zachary P Kaltenborn; Monica I Lupei; Gyorgy Simon; Surbhi Shah; Jonathan D Kirsch; Genevieve B Melton; Nicholas E Ingraham; Andrew P J Olson; Karyn D Baum Journal: J Patient Saf Date: 2021-09-27 Impact factor: 2.243
Authors: Christopher J Tignanelli; Bradly Watarai; Yunhua Fan; Ashley Petersen; Mark Hemmila; Lena Napolitano; Stephanie Jarosek; Anthony Charles Journal: Am Surg Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 1.002
Authors: Christopher J Tignanelli; Alexander Rix; Lena M Napolitano; Mark R Hemmila; Sisi Ma; Erich Kummerfeld Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-03-02