Michelle P Zeller1,2,3, Bram Rochwerg4,5, Erin Jamula1, Na Li1, Christopher Hillis1,6, Jason P Acker7,8, Ryan J R Runciman1, Shannon J Lane1, Naveen Ahmed1, Donald M Arnold1,3, Nancy M Heddle1,3. 1. McMaster Centre for Transfusion Research, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 2. Canadian Blood Services, Medical Office, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 3. Division of Hematology and Thromboembolism, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 4. Division of Critical Care, Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 5. Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 6. Department of Oncology, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada. 7. Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. 8. Centre for Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Selection of a compatible red blood cell (RBC) unit does not include matching for donor sex. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarize the evidence examining the impact of sex-mismatched RBC transfusion on recipient mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from inception up to 23 November 2018. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included in the search. Eligible studies reported on the impact of sex-matched compared to sex-mismatched RBC transfusion on recipient mortality. Two investigators independently extracted data and assessed study quality. A three-level meta-analytic model was applied to emphasize the unknown dependence among the effect sizes. RESULTS: Five retrospective observational studies (n = 86 737) were included; no RCTs were found. Sex-mismatched RBC transfusions were associated with a higher risk of death compared with sex-matched transfusions (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 1·13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1·02-1·24). In the subgroup of cardiovascular surgery (n = 57 712), there was no significant increase in mortality with sex-mismatched transfusions (pooled HR: 1·08; 95% CI: 0·95-1·22). The data were prone to confounding, selection bias and reporting bias. Certainty of the evidence was very low. CONCLUSION: Sex-mismatched RBC transfusions were associated with an increased risk of death in this pooled analysis. However, the certainty of the evidence was very low from observational studies. The need to match donor and recipient sex for transfusions requires further investigation because of the potential widespread impact.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Selection of a compatible red blood cell (RBC) unit does not include matching for donor sex. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarize the evidence examining the impact of sex-mismatched RBC transfusion on recipient mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were searched from inception up to 23 November 2018. Randomized controlled trials and observational studies were included in the search. Eligible studies reported on the impact of sex-matched compared to sex-mismatched RBC transfusion on recipient mortality. Two investigators independently extracted data and assessed study quality. A three-level meta-analytic model was applied to emphasize the unknown dependence among the effect sizes. RESULTS: Five retrospective observational studies (n = 86 737) were included; no RCTs were found. Sex-mismatched RBC transfusions were associated with a higher risk of death compared with sex-matched transfusions (pooled hazard ratio [HR]: 1·13; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1·02-1·24). In the subgroup of cardiovascular surgery (n = 57 712), there was no significant increase in mortality with sex-mismatched transfusions (pooled HR: 1·08; 95% CI: 0·95-1·22). The data were prone to confounding, selection bias and reporting bias. Certainty of the evidence was very low. CONCLUSION: Sex-mismatched RBC transfusions were associated with an increased risk of death in this pooled analysis. However, the certainty of the evidence was very low from observational studies. The need to match donor and recipient sex for transfusions requires further investigation because of the potential widespread impact.
Authors: Olga Mykhailova; Carly Olafson; Tracey R Turner; Angelo DʼAlessandro; Jason P Acker Journal: Transfusion Date: 2020-08-19 Impact factor: 3.157
Authors: Alkmini T Anastasiadi; Efthymios C Paronis; Vasiliki-Zoi Arvaniti; Athanasios D Velentzas; Anastasia C Apostolidou; Evangelos G Balafas; Monika Dzieciatkowska; Nikolaos G Kostomitsopoulos; Konstantinos Stamoulis; Issidora S Papassideri; Angelo D'Alessandro; Anastasios G Kriebardis; Marianna H Antonelou; Vassilis L Tzounakas Journal: Int J Mol Sci Date: 2021-11-13 Impact factor: 5.923
Authors: Abdulrahman Alshalani; Fabrice Uhel; Olaf L Cremer; Marcus J Schultz; Karen M K de Vooght; Robin van Bruggen; Jason P Acker; Nicole P Juffermans Journal: Blood Adv Date: 2022-06-14
Authors: Dean A Fergusson; Michael Chassé; Alan Tinmouth; Jason P Acker; Shane English; Alan J Forster; Steven Hawken; Nadine Shehata; Kednapa Thavorn; Kumanan Wilson; Angie Tuttle; Iris Perelman; Nancy Cober; Heather Maddison; Melanie Tokessy Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2021-02-23 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Alkmini T Anastasiadi; Vasiliki-Zoi Arvaniti; Efthymios C Paronis; Nikolaos G Kostomitsopoulos; Konstantinos Stamoulis; Issidora S Papassideri; Angelo D'Alessandro; Anastasios G Kriebardis; Vassilis L Tzounakas; Marianna H Antonelou Journal: Biomedicines Date: 2022-02-23