M N Minuto1,2, S Reina3,4, E Monti5, G L Ansaldo4, E Varaldo3,4. 1. Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche (DISC), Università degli Studi di Genova, V.le Benedetto XV 6, 16132, Genoa, Italy. michele.minuto@unige.it. 2. U.O. Chirurgia 1, Dipartimento di Chirurgia, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy. michele.minuto@unige.it. 3. Dipartimento di Scienze Chirurgiche (DISC), Università degli Studi di Genova, V.le Benedetto XV 6, 16132, Genoa, Italy. 4. U.O. Chirurgia 1, Dipartimento di Chirurgia, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy. 5. Dipartimento di Medicina Interna (DIMI), Università degli Studi di Genova, Genoa, Italy.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The endocrine surgeon and the endocrinologist should standardize how they deal with patients with an indication for thyroidectomy, as the road to surgery starts well before the operation itself. The patient should be thoroughly informed about where and how surgery will be performed, the postoperative improvements that can be expected, and the possibility and incidence of relevant complications. This short review aims at identifying the most common postoperative issues after thyroidectomy, with the relevant therapeutic suggestions. METHODS: A revision of studies reporting the morbidity of thyroid surgery, involving the largest numbers of patients. RESULTS: It has been clearly demonstrated that the outcome of thyroid surgery is significantly better when the procedure is performed by an experienced surgeon. Thus, the number of thyroidectomies performed by a surgeon should drive the endocrinologist when referring a patient. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the surgeon's experience, thyroidectomy is burdened by a relatively high rate of postoperative issues ranging from less severe ones to others causing significant changes in the patient's quality of life. Minor, non-invalidating symptoms have been described in 40% of patients after thyroidectomy (e.g. hoarseness, mild dysphagia, some degree of voice alteration); however, these symptoms usually resolve within a few months of surgery, with or without early treatment. On the other hand, major postoperative complications are observed in a limited number of patients, but in these cases early diagnosis is important to provide the most appropriate postoperative treatment, and thus hasten full recovery or at least achieve the greatest possible improvement.
PURPOSE: The endocrine surgeon and the endocrinologist should standardize how they deal with patients with an indication for thyroidectomy, as the road to surgery starts well before the operation itself. The patient should be thoroughly informed about where and how surgery will be performed, the postoperative improvements that can be expected, and the possibility and incidence of relevant complications. This short review aims at identifying the most common postoperative issues after thyroidectomy, with the relevant therapeutic suggestions. METHODS: A revision of studies reporting the morbidity of thyroid surgery, involving the largest numbers of patients. RESULTS: It has been clearly demonstrated that the outcome of thyroid surgery is significantly better when the procedure is performed by an experienced surgeon. Thus, the number of thyroidectomies performed by a surgeon should drive the endocrinologist when referring a patient. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the surgeon's experience, thyroidectomy is burdened by a relatively high rate of postoperative issues ranging from less severe ones to others causing significant changes in the patient's quality of life. Minor, non-invalidating symptoms have been described in 40% of patients after thyroidectomy (e.g. hoarseness, mild dysphagia, some degree of voice alteration); however, these symptoms usually resolve within a few months of surgery, with or without early treatment. On the other hand, major postoperative complications are observed in a limited number of patients, but in these cases early diagnosis is important to provide the most appropriate postoperative treatment, and thus hasten full recovery or at least achieve the greatest possible improvement.
Authors: Irene de Pedro Netto; Aline Fae; José Guilherme Vartanian; Ana Paula Brandão Barros; Luiz Maurício Correia; Ronaldo Nunes Toledo; José Ricardo Gurgel Testa; Inês Nobuko Nishimoto; Luiz Paulo Kowalski; Elisabete Carrara-de Angelis Journal: Head Neck Date: 2006-12 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: A Bergenfelz; S Jansson; A Kristoffersson; H Mårtensson; E Reihnér; G Wallin; I Lausen Journal: Langenbecks Arch Surg Date: 2008-07-17 Impact factor: 3.445
Authors: S Dogan; N A Sahbaz; N Aksakal; F Tutal; B C Torun; N K Yıldırım; M Özkan; B Ozcinar; Y Erbil Journal: J Endocrinol Invest Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Jeffrey Saad Jumaily; J Pieter Noordzij; Alex G Dukas; Stephanie L Lee; Victor J Bernet; Richard J Payne; Ian K McLeod; Michael P Hier; Martin J Black; Paul D Kerr; Marco Raffaelli; Rocco Bellantone; Celestino P Lombardi; Mary S Dietrich Journal: Head Neck Date: 2010-04 Impact factor: 3.147