Literature DB >> 31123798

Commentary on 'Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques'.

Matthew L Izett1,2.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2019        PMID： 31123798     DOI： 10.1007/s00192-019-03961-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN： 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  The Manchester-Fothergill procedure versus vaginal hysterectomy with uterosacral ligament suspension: a matched historical cohort study.

Authors:  Cæcilie Krogsgaard Tolstrup; Karen Ruben Husby; Gunnar Lose; Tine Iskov Kopp; Petra Hall Viborg; Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel; Niels Klarskov
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 2.894

2.  Uterine preservation vs hysterectomy in pelvic organ prolapse surgery: a systematic review with meta-analysis and clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Kate V Meriwether; Danielle D Antosh; Cedric K Olivera; Shunaha Kim-Fine; Ethan M Balk; Miles Murphy; Cara L Grimes; Ambereen Sleemi; Ruchira Singh; Alexis A Dieter; Catrina C Crisp; David D Rahn
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2018-01-17       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Surgical treatment of primary uterine prolapse: a comparison of vaginal native tissue surgical techniques.

Authors:  Karen Ruben Husby; Michael Due Larsen; Gunnar Lose; Niels Klarskov
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2019-05-03       Impact factor: 2.894
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.