PURPOSE: Ductal prostate cancer (dPC) is a rare variant of prostatic adenocarcinoma associated with poor outcomes. Although its histopathologic features are well characterized, the underlying molecular hallmarks of this aggressive subtype are not well described. We sought to provide a comprehensive overview of the spectrum of mutations associated with dPC. METHODS: Three case series across multiple institutions were assembled. All patients had a diagnosis of dPC, and histopathologic classification was confirmed by an expert genitourinary pathologist. Case series 1 included men who were prospectively enrolled in a tumor sequencing study at the University of Washington (n = 22). Case series 2 and 3 included archival samples from men treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital (n = 21) and University of Calgary (n = 8), respectively. Tumor tissue was sequenced on a targeted next-generation sequencing assay, UW-OncoPlex, according to previously published methods. The frequency of pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutations are reported. RESULTS: Overall, 25 patients (49%) had at least one DNA damage repair gene alteration, including seven (14%) with a mismatch repair gene mutation and 16 (31%) with a homologous repair mutation. Germline autosomal dominant mutations were confirmed or suspected in 10 patients (20%). Activating mutations in the PI3K pathway (n = 19; 37%), WNT pathway (n = 16; 31%), and MAPK pathway (n = 8; 16%) were common. CONCLUSION: This study strongly suggests that dPCs are enriched for actionable mutations, with approximately 50% of patients demonstrating DNA damage repair pathway alteration(s). Patients with dPC should be offered next-generation sequencing to guide standard-of-care treatment (eg, immune checkpoint inhibitors) or triaged toward an appropriate clinical trial (eg, poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase inhibitors).
PURPOSE:Ductal prostate cancer (dPC) is a rare variant of prostatic adenocarcinomaassociated with poor outcomes. Although its histopathologic features are well characterized, the underlying molecular hallmarks of this aggressive subtype are not well described. We sought to provide a comprehensive overview of the spectrum of mutations associated with dPC. METHODS: Three case series across multiple institutions were assembled. All patients had a diagnosis of dPC, and histopathologic classification was confirmed by an expert genitourinary pathologist. Case series 1 included men who were prospectively enrolled in a tumor sequencing study at the University of Washington (n = 22). Case series 2 and 3 included archival samples from men treated at Johns Hopkins Hospital (n = 21) and University of Calgary (n = 8), respectively. Tumor tissue was sequenced on a targeted next-generation sequencing assay, UW-OncoPlex, according to previously published methods. The frequency of pathogenic/likely pathogenic mutations are reported. RESULTS: Overall, 25 patients (49%) had at least one DNA damage repair gene alteration, including seven (14%) with a mismatch repair gene mutation and 16 (31%) with a homologous repair mutation. Germline autosomal dominant mutations were confirmed or suspected in 10 patients (20%). Activating mutations in the PI3K pathway (n = 19; 37%), WNT pathway (n = 16; 31%), and MAPK pathway (n = 8; 16%) were common. CONCLUSION: This study strongly suggests that dPCs are enriched for actionable mutations, with approximately 50% of patients demonstrating DNA damage repair pathway alteration(s). Patients with dPC should be offered next-generation sequencing to guide standard-of-care treatment (eg, immune checkpoint inhibitors) or triaged toward an appropriate clinical trial (eg, poly [ADP-ribose] polymerase inhibitors).
Authors: Michael C Haffner; Wilbert Zwart; Martine P Roudier; Lawrence D True; William G Nelson; Jonathan I Epstein; Angelo M De Marzo; Peter S Nelson; Srinivasan Yegnasubramanian Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2020-12-16 Impact factor: 14.432
Authors: Eugene Shenderov; Pedro Isaacsson Velho; Anas H Awan; Hao Wang; Nooshin Mirkheshti; Tamara L Lotan; Michael A Carducci; Drew M Pardoll; Mario A Eisenberger; Emmanuel S Antonarakis Journal: Prostate Date: 2019-08-07 Impact factor: 4.104
Authors: Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Tamara L Lotan; Harsimar Kaur; Daniela C Salles; Sanjana Murali; Jessica L Hicks; Minh Nguyen; Colin C Pritchard; Angelo M De Marzo; Jerry S Lanchbury; Bruce J Trock; William B Isaacs; Kirsten M Timms Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2020-07-21 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Harsimar B Kaur; Daniela C Salles; Adina Paulk; Jonathan I Epstein; James R Eshleman; Tamara L Lotan Journal: Histopathology Date: 2020-09-24 Impact factor: 5.087
Authors: Veda N Giri; Karen E Knudsen; William K Kelly; Heather H Cheng; Kathleen A Cooney; Michael S Cookson; William Dahut; Scott Weissman; Howard R Soule; Daniel P Petrylak; Adam P Dicker; Saud H AlDubayan; Amanda E Toland; Colin C Pritchard; Curtis A Pettaway; Mary B Daly; James L Mohler; J Kellogg Parsons; Peter R Carroll; Robert Pilarski; Amie Blanco; Ashley Woodson; Alanna Rahm; Mary-Ellen Taplin; Thomas J Polascik; Brian T Helfand; Colette Hyatt; Alicia K Morgans; Felix Feng; Michael Mullane; Jacqueline Powers; Raoul Concepcion; Daniel W Lin; Richard Wender; James Ryan Mark; Anthony Costello; Arthur L Burnett; Oliver Sartor; William B Isaacs; Jianfeng Xu; Jeffrey Weitzel; Gerald L Andriole; Himisha Beltran; Alberto Briganti; Lindsey Byrne; Anne Calvaresi; Thenappan Chandrasekar; David Y T Chen; Robert B Den; Albert Dobi; E David Crawford; James Eastham; Scott Eggener; Matthew L Freedman; Marc Garnick; Patrick T Gomella; Nathan Handley; Mark D Hurwitz; Joseph Izes; R Jeffrey Karnes; Costas Lallas; Lucia Languino; Stacy Loeb; Ana Maria Lopez; Kevin R Loughlin; Grace Lu-Yao; S Bruce Malkowicz; Mark Mann; Patrick Mille; Martin M Miner; Todd Morgan; Jose Moreno; Lorelei Mucci; Ronald E Myers; Sarah M Nielsen; Brock O'Neil; Wayne Pinover; Peter Pinto; Wendy Poage; Ganesh V Raj; Timothy R Rebbeck; Charles Ryan; Howard Sandler; Matthew Schiewer; E Michael D Scott; Brittany Szymaniak; William Tester; Edouard J Trabulsi; Neha Vapiwala; Evan Y Yu; Charnita Zeigler-Johnson; Leonard G Gomella Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2020-06-09 Impact factor: 44.544