| Literature DB >> 31123719 |
Salome Leprince1, Stéphanie Huberlant1,2, Lucie Allegre1,2, Sophie Warembourg1,2, Isabelle Leteuff1,2, Audrey Bethry1, Cedric Paniagua1, Hubert Taillades3, Renaud De Tayrac1,2, Jean Coudane1, Vincent Letouzey1,2, Xavier Garric1.
Abstract
Intrauterine adhesions lead to partial or complete obliteration of the uterine cavity and have life-changing consequences for women. The leading cause of adhesions is believed to be loss of stroma resulting from trauma to the endometrium after surgery. Adhesions are formed when lost stroma is replaced by fibrous tissue that join the uterine walls. Few effective intrauterine anti-adhesion barriers for gynecological surgery exist. We designed a degradable anti-adhesion medical device prototype to prevent adhesion formation and recurrence and restore uterine morphology. We focused on ideal degradation time for complete uterine re-epithelialization for optimal anti-adhesion effect and clinical usability. We developed a triblock copolymer prototype [poly(lactide) combined with high molecular mass poly(ethylene oxide)]. Comparative pre-clinical studies demonstrated in vivo anti-adhesion efficacy. Ease of introduction and optimal deployment in a human uterus confirmed clinical usability. This article provides preliminary data to develop an intrauterine medical device and conduct a clinical trial.Entities:
Keywords: Experimental models of disease; Translational research
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31123719 PMCID: PMC6531438 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-019-0447-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Commun Biol ISSN: 2399-3642
Fig. 1Water uptake, in vitro degradation and in vitro cell adhesion of copolymer films. a Water uptake (%) of triblock films and PDLLA in saline solution (initial pH 7.4) at 37 °C (n = 3 independent samples). b Inherent viscosity during in vitro degradation after immersion in saline solution (initial pH 7.4; 37 °C). c Adhesion of the NCTC 929 cells after 45 min, 1H30 and 3H on copolymer films, PDLLA film, Seprafilm®, and control group (TCPS). All data points and standard deviations are the result of n = 3 independent samples
Characterizations of PDLLA polymer and PDLLA-PEO-PDLLA triblock copolymers
| Polymer | Molecular mass of PEO (kg per mol) | Molecular mass of PDLLA (kg per mol) | Initial LA/EO ratio | Final LA/EO molar ratioa | Inherent viscosityb | Thermal propertiesc |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PDLLA | 0 | 101d | N.A. | N.A. | 0.058 | 46/N.A. |
| TB32-100-32 | 100 | 64a | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.086 | 29/54 |
| TB77-100-77 | 100 | 155a | 1.2 | 0.9 | 0.109 | 42/56 |
a Determined from the 1H-NMR integration ratio of the peak at 1.58 ppm (CH3 group in PLA block) and the peak at 3.6 ppm (CH2 group in PEO block)
b Determined by capillary viscosimeter
c Determined by differential scanning calorimetry
d Determined by size exclusion chromatography
Peritoneal adhesion: scoring system[34]
|
| |
| No adhesion | 0 |
| 1–25% of the cecum-peritoneal defect involved | 1 |
| 26–50% of the cecum-peritoneal defect involved | 2 |
| 51–75% of the cecum-peritoneal defect involved | 3 |
| 76–100% of the cecum-peritoneal defect involved | 4 |
|
| |
| No adhesion | 0 |
| Filmy avascular | 1 |
| Vascular | 2 |
| Total attachment of cecum with peritoneal defect | 3 |
|
| |
| No adhesion | 0 |
| Require gentle traction to be freed | 1 |
| Require moderate traction to be freed | 2 |
| Require sharp dissection or not dissectible | 3 |
| Without damage to adherent organs | |
| Total adhesion score | 0–10 |
Incidence of peritoneal adhesions and postsurgical adhesions score per treatment group on postoperative day 5 and 12
| Postoperative day | Category | Control group | Hyalobarrier® group | TB32-100-32 group | TB77-100-77 group |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Day 5 ( | Incidence (%) | 6 (100%) | 0 | 3 (50%) | 0 |
| Extent | 4.00 ± 0.00 | 0 | 1.00 ± 1.55 | 0 | |
| Severity | 3.00 ± 0.00 | 0 | 1.17 ± 1.33 | 0 | |
| Degree | 2.66 ± 0.52 | 0 | 0.83 ± 1.17 | 0 | |
| Total score | 9,67 ± 0.52 | 0 | 3.00 ± 3.52 | 0 | |
Day 12 ( | Incidence (%) | 5 (83%) | 3 (50%) | 3 (50%) | 0 |
| Extent | 3.00 ± 0.00 | 1.67 ± 1.97 | 1.00 ± 1.09 | 0 | |
| Severity | 2.30 ± 0.00 | 1.33 ± 1.50 | 1.33 ± 1.50 | 0 | |
| Degree | 2.00 ± 0.00 | 1.50 ± 1.64 | 1.17 ± 1.47 | 0 | |
| Total score | 7.33 ± 3.88 | 4.50 ± 5.05 | 3.50 ± 3.99 | 0 |
Fig. 2Prevention of peritoneal adhesions. Macroscopic images and histological examination (HES staining) of the wound site in rats 5 and 12 days after surgical trauma. a Control group: without treatment. b Group treated by instillation of Hyalobarrier gel. c. Group treated by implantation of TB77-100-77 films. In macroscopic images, circles indicate the site of peritoneal defect and black arrows indicate residues of TB77-100-77. For histological examination, Me: Mesothelial cells; CE: Cecal mucosa; SM: Visceral Smooth Muscle; AW: Abdominal Wall. Scale bars: 200 µm
Fig. 3In vivo degradation study of copolymer films after surgical trauma in the abdominal cavity. a TB32-100-32 films residues at initial time and after 2, 5, and 12 days. b TB77-100-77 films residues at initial time and after 2, 5, and 12 days. c Comparison of inherent viscosity of TB77-100-77 films during in vitro degradation after immersion in saline solution and in vivo degradation after surgical trauma. d Schematic degradation of triblock copolymers
Fig. 4Prevention of intrauterine adhesions. Histological observations and higher magnification of each images of uterine tissues by H&E staining. a Normal uterine tissue (no surgery). b Intrauterine adhesion 7 days after scraping surgery of the control group. c Intrauterine adhesion 7 days after scraping surgery of the Hyalobarrier®-treated group. d Uterine tissue 7 days after scraping surgery of the TB77-100-77-treated group. Scale bars in microphotographs indicate 200 µm. UL: uterine lumen; Ep: epithelium; En: endometrium; My: myometrium; Me: mesothelium. Red arrows indicate adhesions
Fig. 5Ex vivo in utero deployment study of TB77-100-77 prototype. a TB77-100-77 film folded and introduced into a 5-mm IUD applicator tube; b In vitro deployment of the TB77-100-77 film in an anatomical uterus model after 60 min; c Illustrations of instillation of physiological saline solution at 37 °C into a uterine cavity. d Observations of the prototype deployment by hysteroscopy after 15 min; e Opening uterus after 60 min and visualization of the prototype deployment. White dotted lines indicate the delimitation of the uterine cavity and yellow dotted lines indicate the delimitation of the canal cervix