| Literature DB >> 31123467 |
Mohamad Ghanimatdan1, Abdolali Chalechale1, Farid Rezaei1, Mohamad Bagher Rokni2, Seyed Reza Shahrokhi3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of fascioliasis and to perform a climatological analysis of different regions of Iran based on the current situation of the parasite and its intermediate host using Geographical Information System (GIS).Entities:
Keywords: Bioclimatic analysis; Fascioliasis; Iran; Risk map; Spatial distribution
Year: 2019 PMID: 31123467 PMCID: PMC6511595
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Parasitol ISSN: 1735-7020 Impact factor: 1.012
Effect of environmental and meteorological conditions on the transmission risk of fascioliasis
| Temperature (°C) | 15–25 | 10–15 or 25–30 | <10 or >30 |
| Precipitation (mm/year) | >1500 | 700–1500 | <700 |
| Elevation (m) | <500 | 500–1000 | >1000 |
| Relative humidity (%) | >60 | 30–60 | <30 |
| Slope (Degree) | <10 | 10–15 | >15 |
Prevalence of fascioliasis in Iran
| 1 | Alborz | 0.98 | 3.03 | 3.05 | 1.49 |
| 2 | Markazi | 1.23 | 0.71 | 2.45 | 1.23 |
| 3 | Mazandaran | 4.86 | 3.09 | 5.05 | 4.32 |
| 4 | Khuzestan | 2.28 | 2.53 | 9.73 | 3.21 |
| 5 | Bushehr | 2.75 | 0.71 | 1.45 | 1.31 |
| 6 | Kermanshah | 1.43 | 2.23 | 3.89 | 2.11 |
| 7 | Ilam | 1.31 | 1.29 | 5.39 | 1.87 |
| 8 | Lorestan | 2.79 | 1.84 | 9.83 | 3.85 |
| 9 | Kurdistan | 5.26 | 2.76 | 5.71 | 5 |
| 10 | Isfahan | 1.78 | 1.29 | 2.58 | 1.6 |
| 11 | Chaharmahal and bakhtiari | 1.45 | 2.7 | 9.29 | 2.39 |
| 12 | Gilan | 11.95 | 5.1 | 15.18 | 10.83 |
| 13 | Hamadan | 2 | 1.61 | 2.45 | 2.04 |
| 14 | Tehran | 1.76 | 3.07 | 8.63 | 2.68 |
| 15 | Qazvin | 1.52 | 0.95 | 1.22 | 1.33 |
| 16 | Semnan | 0.3 | 0.31 | 1.41 | 0.37 |
| 17 | Hormozgan | 3.78 | 1.72 | 2.74 | 2.48 |
| 18 | Kerman | 0.9 | 1.05 | 10.11 | 1.07 |
| 19 | South Khorasan | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| 20 | Razavi Khorasan | 0.83 | 0.3 | 1.92 | 0.68 |
| 21 | North Khorasan | 0.77 | 0.13 | 0.84 | 0.53 |
| 22 | Golestan | 1.65 | 1.71 | 3.33 | 1.86 |
| 23 | Fars | 0.6 | 0.43 | 1.29 | 0.57 |
| 24 | Kohgiluyeh and Boyer-ahmad | 7.28 | 4.03 | 10.37 | 5.52 |
| 25 | Ardabil | 6.06 | 1.29 | 4.19 | 5.29 |
| 26 | West Azerbaijan | 1.86 | 1.84 | 4.65 | 3.10 |
| 27 | East Azerbaijan | 3.97 | 2.91 | 2.72 | 3.63 |
| 28 | Zanjan | 6.92 | 5.62 | 2.24 | 4.31 |
| 29 | Yazd | 0.65 | 0.64 | 2.21 | 0.7 |
| 30 | Zahedan | 7.25 | 4.88 | 2.82 | 2.9 |
| 31 | Qom | 2.14 | 1.33 | 4.06 | 2.06 |
| - | Total | 2.87 | 1.99 | 4.55 | 2.9 |
Prevalence of fascioliasis during 2012–2017 in Iran
| 1 | 2012 | 2.45 | 1.46 | 3.65 |
| 2 | 2013 | 2.85 | 1.94 | 4.37 |
| 3 | 2014 | 2.91 | 2.07 | 4.67 |
| 4 | 2015 | 2.89 | 1.96 | 4.55 |
| 5 | 2016 | 3.11 | 2.23 | 4.9 |
| 6 | 2017 | 3.02 | 2.3 | 5.18 |
| Total | 2.87 | 1.99 | 4.55 |
Fig. 1:Prevalence map of fascioliasis in Iran. A: Sheep, B: Goat, C: Cow, and D: Total fascioliasis
Fig. 2:SD ellipse of prevalence of fascioliasis in Iran
Fig. 3:Correlation between environmental parameters and prevalence of fascioliasis in Iran. A: Elevation, B: Humidity and C: Rainfall
Fig. 4:Risk map of fascioliasis based on environmental and meteorological conditions
Fig. 5:Risk map of fascioliasis based on Ollerenshaw index
Fig. 6:Risk map of fascioliasis based on Malone index