Literature DB >> 31122312

Evaluation of a 16-week Change Cycle for Ventilated Mouse Cages.

Jack L Taylor1, Penny Noel2, Michael Mickelsen2.   

Abstract

The methods and conditions for housing research mice have been the subject of many discussions and publications in recent years. At our institution, we began to explore these matters with the goal of reducing stress in the animals and yet maintaining an environment that more closely resembled their habitat in the wild and yet was acceptable to researchers and the technicians that cared for the animals. Through a series of small inhouse studies, we derived a method that allowed the animals to stay in their established environment for longer than the standard 1- or 2-wk period. After several empirical studies, we concluded that the mice could stay in the same cage for 16 wk or perhaps even longer. To achieve this outcome, we perfected a method of removing 75% of the existing cage bedding and replacing it with clean bedding every 2 wk. To substantiate the validity of the method, we conducted a major study that evaluated the conditions of the cage, cage environment and the animals for a 16-wk period. In the study, we compared all of these factors in the 16-wk cages to a set of cages that were completely replaced on a 2-wk cycle. The mice in our study appeared to experience decreased stress, and observation also revealed that the 16-wk method was associated with increased pup survival in several colonies. The revised 16-wk method appears to create mouse cage conditions that are no different than the current standard (that is, every 1 or 2 wk) methods of cage changing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31122312      PMCID: PMC6643086          DOI: 10.30802/AALAS-JAALAS-18-000070

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci        ISSN: 1559-6109            Impact factor:   1.232


  18 in total

Review 1.  Male management: Coping with aggression problems in male laboratory mice.

Authors:  P L P Van Loo; L F M Van Zutphen; V Baumans
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.471

2.  Evaluation of cage micro-environment of mice housed on various types of bedding materials.

Authors:  Ellen Smith; Jason D Stockwell; Isabelle Schweitzer; Stephen H Langley; Abigail L Smith
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2004-07

Review 3.  Laboratory routines cause animal stress.

Authors:  Jonathan P Balcombe; Neal D Barnard; Chad Sandusky
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2004-11

4.  Characterization and quantification of microenvironmental contaminants in isolator cages with a variety of contact beddings.

Authors:  S E Perkins; N S Lipman
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1995-05

5.  Investigation of appropriate sanitization frequency for rodent caging accessories: evidence supporting less-frequent cleaning.

Authors:  Curtis W Schondelmeyer; Dirck L Dillehay; Sonji K Webb; Michael J Huerkamp; Deborah M Mook; Jennifer K Pullium
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.232

6.  The impact of reduced frequency of cage changes on the health of mice housed in ventilated cages.

Authors:  C K Reeb-Whitaker; B Paigen; W G Beamer; R T Bronson; G A Churchill; I B Schweitzer; D D Myers
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.471

7.  Microenvironment in Ventilated Animal Cages with Differing Ventilation Rates, Mice Populations, and Frequency of Bedding Changes.

Authors:  Carolyn Reeb; Robert Jones; David Bearg; Hendrick Bedigan; David Myers; Beverly Paigen
Journal:  Contemp Top Lab Anim Sci       Date:  1998-03

8.  Effects of housing density and cage floor space on C57BL/6J mice.

Authors:  Abigail L Smith; Sarah L Mabus; Jason D Stockwell; Cameron Muir
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 0.982

9.  Ammonia and carbon dioxide concentrations in disposable and reusable ventilated mouse cages.

Authors:  Jerald Silverman; David W Bays; Sheldon F Cooper; Stephen P Baker
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 1.232

Review 10.  The impact of light, noise, cage cleaning and in-house transport on welfare and stress of laboratory rats.

Authors:  M J Castelhano-Carlos; V Baumans
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 2.471

View more
  2 in total

1.  Assessing Accumulation of Organic Material on Rodent Cage Accessories.

Authors:  Kenneth P Allen; Tarrant J Csida; Joseph D Thulin
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2021-03-05       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  A multicentre study on spontaneous in-cage activity and micro-environmental conditions of IVC housed C57BL/6J mice during consecutive cycles of bi-weekly cage-change.

Authors:  B Ulfhake; H Lerat; J Honetschlager; K Pernold; M Rynekrová; K Escot; C Recordati; R V Kuiper; G Rosati; M Rigamonti; S Zordan; J-B Prins
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-25       Impact factor: 3.752

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.