| Literature DB >> 31120962 |
Xin Fu1, Hao Yang2, Chenxi Liu2, Jianwei Wang1, Yinhai Wang2.
Abstract
Accurate Origin-Destination (OD) prediction is significant for effective traffic monitor, which can support operation decision in traffic planning and management field. The enclosed expressway network system like toll gates system in China can collect mounts of trip records which can be gathered for OD prediction. The paper develops a novel neural network, which is named Expressway OD Prediction Neural Network (EODPNN) for toll data-based prediction. The network consists of the following three modules: The Feature Extension Module, the Memory Module, and the Prediction Module. In the process, the attributes data which can reflect the city attribute such as GDP, population, and the number of vehicles are considered to embeded into the notwork to increase the accuracy of the model. For the applicability improvment of the model, we categorize the cities in multiple classes based on their economy and population scales in this paper, which can provide a higher accurate prediction of OD by EODPNN. The results shows that, comparing to the traditional model like ARIMA and SVM, or typical neural networks like Bidirectional Long Short-term Memory, the EODPNN delivers a better prediction performance. The method proposed in this paper has been fully verified and has a potential to transplant to the other OD data-based management systems for a more accurate and flexible prediction.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31120962 PMCID: PMC6532916 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217241
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Toll data structure.
| Field Name | Field Type | Data Example | Remarks Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry Gate No | Int | 006 | |
| Entry Lane No | Int | 12 | |
| Entry Time | Date | 2017/9/1 20:54:00 | |
| Exit Gate No | Int | 002 | |
| Exit Lane No | Int | 2 | |
| Exit Time | Date | 2017/9/1 22:31:00 | |
| Exit Lane Type | Int | 1 | ‘0’-ETC, ‘1’-Non_ETC |
| Vehicle Type | Int | 5 | |
| Vehicle License | String | “A96534” | |
| Vehicle Kind | Int | 0 | ‘0’-Car, ‘1’-Truck |
Fig 1Expressway OD pair representation.
Fig 2Express way OD prediction neural-network (EODPNN) architecture.
Fig 3Bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM) network.
Fig 4Summary of toll gates distribution.
Fig 5Daily average flow pattern.
(a) Monday. (b) Tuesday. (c) Wednesday. (d) Thursday. (e) Friday. (f) Saturday. (g) Sunday.
Fig 6Cumulative flow distribution of OD pairs in network.
Network performance comparison.
| MAE (veh/15min) | RMSE (veh/15min) | MAPE (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVG | 13.4 | 14.2 | 104.25% |
| ARIMA | 17.96 | 19.39 | 57.9% |
| 14.69 | 18.19 | 50.12% | |
| RNN | 9.13 | 9.44 | 33.48% |
| 1 Layer-LSTM | 7.08 | 7.85 | 27.74% |
| 2 Layer-LSTM | 4.12 | 5.16 | 16.25% |
| Bi-LSTM | 3.67 | 4.08 | 14.71% |
| EODPNN | 2.46 | 3.01 | 9.75% |
• AVG: Calculate the average flow of each OD pair within a specific time interval simlply and use the mean as the predicated value.
• ARIMA: Employ ARIMA model to predict the flow of OD pairs within a specific time interval.
• SVM: Employ (SVM) model to predict the flow of OD pairs within a specific time interval.
• RNN: Take advantage of (RNN) to predict the flow of OD pairs within a specific time interval.
• 1 Layer LSTM and 2 Layer-LSTM: Use one and two layers Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks to predict the OD sequences. The result shows that a 2-layers LSTM is much better than one-layer [35].
• Bi-LSTM: Use bidirectional LSTM (Bi-LSTM) network without the Feature Extraction Module [36].
Prediction performance for different time intervals.
| Time interval | MAE | RMSE | MAPE |
|---|---|---|---|
| 15 minutes | 2.46 | 3.01 | 9.75% |
| 30 minutes | 4.02 | 5.04 | 12.32% |
| 45 minutes | 5.25 | 7.52 | 11.01% |
| 60 minutes | 8.91 | 11.89 | 11.24% |
Prediction performance for different scale of city toll gates.
| City | Examples | Evaluation index | Value (per 15min) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Metropolis | Gudang dong Shenzhen | MAE (Veh) | 3.42 |
| RMSE (veh) | 8.06 | ||
| MAPE (%) | 14.67% | ||
| Big city | Foshan Zhanjiang Dongwan | MAE (veh) | 2.26 |
| RMSE (veh) | 2.42 | ||
| MAPE (%) | 8.89% | ||
| Medium City | Meizhou Qingyuan etc. | MAE (veh) | 2.14 |
| RMSE (veh) | 2.73 | ||
| MAPE (%) | 12.74% | ||
| Small City | Zhuhai Chaozhou etc. | MAE (veh) | 2.81 |
| RMSE (veh) | 3.42 | ||
| MAPE (%) | 10.15% |