Literature DB >> 31120533

Effect of Tinnitus Retraining Therapy vs Standard of Care on Tinnitus-Related Quality of Life: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Roberta W Scherer1, Craig Formby2.   

Abstract

Importance: Tinnitus retraining therapy (TRT) is an internationally recognized, but controversial, protocol of uncertain efficacy that uses tinnitus-specific educational counseling (TC) and sound therapy (ST) to reduce the patient's tinnitus-evoked negative reaction to, and awareness of, tinnitus. Objective: To compare the efficacy of TRT and its components, ST and TC, with the standard of care (SoC) in reducing the negative effect of tinnitus on quality of life. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase 3 trial was conducted from August 4, 2011, to June 20, 2017, at 6 US military hospitals, the study chairs' office, and a data coordinating center, among 151 active-duty and retired military personnel and dependents with functionally adequate hearing sensitivity and moderate to severe subjective tinnitus. All analyses were based on intention to treat. Interventions: Central randomized allocation to TRT (TC and ST with conventional sound generators), partial TRT (TC with placebo sound generators), or SoC. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was mean change on the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), assessed longitudinally between baseline and 18 months after start of therapy. The secondary outcomes were changes in TQ subscales, Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI), and Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) total and subscales, as well as a 10-point visual analog scale (VAS).
Results: Among the 151 participants in the study (44 women and 107 men; mean [SD] age, 50.6 [11.3] years), 51 were randomized to receive TRT, 51 to receive partial TRT, and 49 to receive standard of care. Longitudinal analyses showed no difference between partial TRT or TRT compared with SoC, or partial TRT compared with TRT, on TQ, TFI, or THI total scores. Comparison of changes in mean score from baseline to the 18-month visit also showed no difference between treatment groups. Significant improvement was observed at 18 months in all treatment groups on TQ scores for TRT (effect size, -1.32; 95% CI, -1.78 to -0.85), partial TRT (effect size, -1.16; 95% CI, -1.56 to -0.76), and SoC (effect size, -1.01; 95% CI, -1.41 to -0.61). Compared with baseline scores, at 18 months there were reductions in scores by 7 points or more on the TQ score for 86 of 111 participants (77.55%; 95% CI, 69.7%-85.2%), 13 points or more on the TFI for 52 of 111 participants (46.8%; 95% CI, 37.6%-56.1%), 7 points or more on the THI for 63 of 111 participants (56.8%; 95% CI, 47.5%-66.0%), and 2 points or more on the VAS for 45 of 93 participants (48.4%; 95% CI, 38.2%-58.5%). Conclusions and Relevance: There were few differences between treatment groups. About half of participants showed clinically meaningful reductions in the effect of tinnitus. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01177137.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31120533      PMCID: PMC6547112          DOI: 10.1001/jamaoto.2019.0821

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 2168-6181            Impact factor:   6.223


  23 in total

1.  Tinnitus handicap inventory for evaluating treatment effects: which changes are clinically relevant?

Authors:  Florian Zeman; Michael Koller; Ricardo Figueiredo; Andreia Aazevedo; Marcello Rates; Claudia Coelho; Tobias Kleinjung; Dirk de Ridder; Berthold Langguth; Michael Landgrebe
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.497

2.  Lessons learned conducting a multi-center trial with a military population: The Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial.

Authors:  Roberta W Scherer; Leonora D Sensinger; Benigno Sierra-Irizarry; Craig Formby
Journal:  Clin Trials       Date:  2018-05-23       Impact factor: 2.486

3.  Power and sample size calculations. A review and computer program.

Authors:  W D Dupont; W D Plummer
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1990-04

4.  Celebrating a decade of evaluation and treatment: the University of Maryland Tinnitus & Hyperacusis Center.

Authors:  S L Gold; C Formby; W C Gray
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 1.493

5.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales.

Authors:  D Watson; L A Clark; A Tellegen
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1988-06

6.  Acceptance and commitment therapy versus tinnitus retraining therapy in the treatment of tinnitus: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Vendela Zetterqvist Westin; Mikael Schulin; Hugo Hesser; Marianne Karlsson; Reza Zare Noe; Ulrike Olofsson; Magnus Stalby; Gisela Wisung; Gerhard Andersson
Journal:  Behav Res Ther       Date:  2011-08-09

7.  Test-retest reliability of the hearing handicap inventory for adults.

Authors:  C W Newman; B E Weinstein; G P Jacobson; G A Hug
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory.

Authors:  C W Newman; G P Jacobson; J B Spitzer
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1996-02

9.  Rationale for the tinnitus retraining therapy trial.

Authors:  Craig Formby; Roberta Scherer
Journal:  Noise Health       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.867

10.  The effect of tinnitus retraining therapy on chronic tinnitus: A controlled trial.

Authors:  Carol A Bauer; Jennifer L Berry; Thomas J Brozoski
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2017-05-28
View more
  15 in total

1.  The Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial's Standard of Care Control Condition: Rationale and Description of a Patient-Centered Protocol.

Authors:  Sue Ann Erdman; Roberta W Scherer; Benigno Sierra-Irizarry; Craig Formby
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 1.493

2.  Correlation between clinical characteristics and tinnitus severity in tinnitus patients of different sexes: an analytic retrospective study.

Authors:  Hao Yuan; Pei-Heng Lu; Jia-Wei Chen; Peng-Wei Ma; Wei-Long Wang; Xue-Rui Ding; Yu-Qiang Lun; Wei Gao; Lian-Jun Lu
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-06-15       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  S3 Guideline: Chronic Tinnitus : German Society for Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery e. V. (DGHNO-KHC).

Authors:  Birgit Mazurek; Gerhard Hesse; Heribert Sattel; Volker Kratzsch; Claas Lahmann; Christian Dobel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2022-10-13       Impact factor: 1.330

Review 4.  Chronic Tinnitus.

Authors:  Birgit Mazurek; Gerhard Hesse; Christian Dobel; Volker Kratzsch; Claas Lahmann; Heribert Sattel
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 8.251

5.  Contributions of Counseling and Sound Generator Use in Tinnitus Retraining Therapy: Treatment Response Dynamics Assessed in a Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Craig Formby; Xin Yang; Roberta W Scherer
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 2.674

6.  The Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Counseling Protocol as Implemented in the Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial.

Authors:  Susan L Gold; Craig Formby; Roberta W Scherer
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2020-12-01       Impact factor: 1.493

7.  Treatment fidelity in the Tinnitus Retraining Therapy Trial.

Authors:  Roberta W Scherer; Sue Ann Erdman; Susan Gold; Craig Formby
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 8.  Auditory Neural Plasticity in Tinnitus Mechanisms and Management.

Authors:  Kunkun Wang; Dongmei Tang; Jiaoyao Ma; Shan Sun
Journal:  Neural Plast       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.599

9.  Changes in the Resting-State Cortical Oscillatory Activity 6 Months After Modified Tinnitus Retraining Therapy.

Authors:  Sang-Yeon Lee; Jihye Rhee; Ye Ji Shim; Yoonjoong Kim; Ja-Won Koo; Dirk De Ridder; Sven Vanneste; Jae-Jin Song
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-18       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Coping in Chronic Tinnitus Patients.

Authors:  Sebastiaan M Meijers; Arno F Lieftink; Inge Stegeman; Adriana L Smit
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 4.003

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.