| Literature DB >> 31120043 |
Haiyan Zhu1, Rongrong Zhang1, Chuangli Hao2, Xingmei Yu2, Zhaofang Tian1, Yufang Yuan1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cough variant asthma in children presents with a dry nonproductive cough. This study aimed to investigate the diagnostic value of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) combined with small airway functional parameters in cough variant asthma. MATERIAL AND METHODS Children with asthma (n=136) were divided into a cough variant asthma (CVA) group (n=57; mean age, 8.03±2.1 years) and a non-cough variant asthma (nCVA) group (n=79; mean age, 8.61±1.7 years). In both groups, FeNO and other pulmonary function parameters were measured including forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow (PEF), maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF), forced expiratory flow (FEF), and maximum expiratory flow at 25%, 50%, and 75% expired volume (MEF25, MEF50, and MEF75). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis compared the sensitivity and specificity between the diagnostic parameters. RESULTS The FeNO values were significantly increased in the CVA group compared with the nCVA group (Z=6.890, p<0.001). The MMEF, MEF25, MEF50, and MEF75 values were significantly lower in the CVA group compared with the nCVA group (p=0.000, p=0.014, p=0.000, and p=0.000, respectively). The FeNO values were negatively correlated with MEF25, MEF50, and MMEF (ρ=-0.334, ρ=-0.257 and ρ=-0.276, respectively). FeNO was significantly more efficient diagnosing cough variant asthma comparing with pulmonary parameters (p<0.05), and was most sensitive and specific when combined with MMEF/MEF50 compared with single diagnostic parameters (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS FeNO combined with pulmonary function parameters of MMEF/MEF50 showed increased sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of cough variant asthma.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31120043 PMCID: PMC6543875 DOI: 10.12659/MSM.913761
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Comparison of the fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and parameters of lung function between the cough variant asthma (CVA) group (n=57) and non-cough variant asthma (nCVA) group of pediatric patients.
| Items | CVA (n=57) | nCVA (n=79) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FeNO (ppb) | 37.8 (13.7) | 19.1 (9.8) | Z=6.890 | <0.001 |
| FEV1% predicted value (%, x±s) | 96.6±12.6 | 99.9±11.0 | t=1.891 | 0.093 |
| FVC% predicted value (%, x_±s) | 98.8±13.4 | 100.3±14.2 | t=0.898 | 0.372 |
| FEV1/FVC (%, x±s) | 103.5±8.7 | 103.1±14.2 | t=0.126 | 0.900 |
| PEF% predicted value (%, x±s) | 98.2±14.6 | 96.6±11.8 | t=0.857 | 0.392 |
| MMEF (%, x±s) | 73.7±17.7 | 91.9±18.4 | t=4.521 | 0.000 |
| MEF75 (%, x±s) | 84.4±15.3 | 91.8±16.4 | t=1.989 | 0.014 |
| MEF50 (%, x±s) | 73.4±18.1 | 93.5±18.1 | t=5.253 | 0.000 |
| MEF25 (%, x±s) | 68.0±24.1 | 94.8±15.4 | t=3.976 | 0.000 |
Figure 1Correlation analysis between fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and small airway functional parameters. (A) Correlation between fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and maximum expiratory flow at 25% (MEF25). (B) Correlation between FeNO and maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF).
Correlation analysis between the fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and large and small airway lung function.
| Items | ρ values | |
|---|---|---|
| FeNO/FEV1% predicted value | −0.125 | 0.257 |
| FeNO/PEF% predicted value | −0.189 | 0.185 |
| FeNO/FVC% predicted value | −0.067 | 0.715 |
| FeNO/MMEF% predicted value | −0.276 | 0.011 |
| FeNO/MEF75% predicted value | −0.195 | 0.075 |
| FeNO/MEF50% predicted value | −0.257 | 0.018 |
| FeNO/MEF25% predicted value | −0.334 | 0.002 |
Diagnostic efficacy of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and lung function for the cough variant asthma (CVA) group.
| Items | AUC (95% CI) | Cutoff value | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FeNO (ppb) | 0.905 (0.821–0.958) | 25.5 | 82.2 | 90.0 | <0.01 |
| MEF75 (%) | 0.726 (0.618–0.818) | 90.9 | 80.2 | 50.0 | <0.01 |
| MEF50 (%) | 0.792 (0.690–0.873) | 78.0 | 64.7 | 82.0 | <0.01 |
| MEF25 (%) | 0.777 (0.673–0.861) | 70.6 | 70.6 | 76.0 | <0.01 |
| MMEF (%) | 0.800 (0.698–0.879) | 80.5 | 73.5 | 78.0 | <0.01 |
Figure 2Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) for the diagnosis of cough variant asthma. (A) Diagnostic efficacy of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO). (B) Diagnostic efficacy of maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF).
Diagnostic effects of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) combined with small airway function in children with cough variant asthma.
| Items | AUC (95% CI) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| FeNO | 0.905 (0.821–0.958) | 82.2 | 90.0 |
| FeNO+MEF50 (%) | 0.919 (0.839–0.968) | 84.6 | 94.0 |
| FeNO+MMEF (%) | 0.928 (0.850–0.973) | 85.4 | 96.0 |
Combination 1: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) + maximum mid-expiratory flow (MMEF) (%). Combination 2: Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) + maximum expiratory flow at 50% (MEF50) (%).
Figure 3Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to compare the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity between fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) alone or in combination with maximum mid-expiratory flow/maximum expiratory flow at 25% (MMEF/MEF25) for the diagnosis of cough variant asthma.