Samantha Nazione1, Evan K Perrault2, David M Keating3. 1. Communication Department, Berry College, Box 299 Berry College, Mount Berry, GA, 30149, USA. snazione@berry.edu. 2. Brian Lamb School of Communication, Purdue University, 100 N. University Street, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. 3. California State University, Northridge, Communication Studies, MZ 351, 18111 Nordhoff Street, Northridge, CA, 91330, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Improvements in provider-patient relationships may help alleviate health disparities. Provider-patient race concordance and provider self-disclosure are variables that may help improve this relationship. PURPOSE: This study sought to answer if provider-patient race concordance and provider self-disclosure may improve patient trust, rapport, similarity, likeability, intention to disclose, satisfaction, behavioral intention to keep a provider, and intention to recommend a provider, while using empathy as a covariate. METHODS: Using 882 White or Black participants, the current research used a 2 × 2 online experimental design. Participants were asked to read a vignette in which they were told they had borderline high cholesterol and needed to eat a healthier diet, by either a Black or White male physician, who either self-disclosed or did not self-disclose regarding their own struggle to eat a healthy diet. After reading this vignette, participants were surveyed regarding the dependent variables of interest. RESULTS: Participants in a Black concordant dyad reported higher levels of similarity than those in any other dyad. Provider self-disclosure led to higher levels of trust, rapport, similarity, likeability, intention to disclose, satisfaction, behavioral intention to continue using the provider, and intention to recommend the provider. No interaction effects were found. CONCLUSION: While it is possible, based on past research, that race-concordant pairings may lead to trust via similarity, provider self-disclosure directly increased perceptions of trust as well as providing numerous other benefits. This study supports the importance of trainings for providers on health-related self-disclosure to benefit both parties in provider-patient dyads.
BACKGROUND: Improvements in provider-patient relationships may help alleviate health disparities. Provider-patient race concordance and provider self-disclosure are variables that may help improve this relationship. PURPOSE: This study sought to answer if provider-patient race concordance and provider self-disclosure may improve patient trust, rapport, similarity, likeability, intention to disclose, satisfaction, behavioral intention to keep a provider, and intention to recommend a provider, while using empathy as a covariate. METHODS: Using 882 White or Black participants, the current research used a 2 × 2 online experimental design. Participants were asked to read a vignette in which they were told they had borderline high cholesterol and needed to eat a healthier diet, by either a Black or White male physician, who either self-disclosed or did not self-disclose regarding their own struggle to eat a healthy diet. After reading this vignette, participants were surveyed regarding the dependent variables of interest. RESULTS:Participants in a Black concordant dyad reported higher levels of similarity than those in any other dyad. Provider self-disclosure led to higher levels of trust, rapport, similarity, likeability, intention to disclose, satisfaction, behavioral intention to continue using the provider, and intention to recommend the provider. No interaction effects were found. CONCLUSION: While it is possible, based on past research, that race-concordant pairings may lead to trust via similarity, provider self-disclosure directly increased perceptions of trust as well as providing numerous other benefits. This study supports the importance of trainings for providers on health-related self-disclosure to benefit both parties in provider-patient dyads.
Authors: L Ebony Boulware; Lisa A Cooper; Lloyd E Ratner; Thomas A LaVeist; Neil R Powe Journal: Public Health Rep Date: 2003 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.792
Authors: L Ebony Boulware; Lloyd E Ratner; Lisa A Cooper; Julie Ann Sosa; Thomas A LaVeist; Neil R Powe Journal: Med Care Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Mohammadreza Hojat; Joseph S Gonnella; Thomas J Nasca; Salvatore Mangione; Michael Vergare; Michael Magee Journal: Am J Psychiatry Date: 2002-09 Impact factor: 18.112
Authors: Howard S Gordon; Richard L Street; Barbara F Sharf; P Adam Kelly; Julianne Souchek Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-02-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lisa A Cooper; Debra L Roter; Rachel L Johnson; Daniel E Ford; Donald M Steinwachs; Neil R Powe Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2003-12-02 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Eric J Cooks; Kyle A Duke; Jordan M Neil; Melissa J Vilaro; Danyell Wilson-Howard; Francois Modave; Thomas J George; Folakemi T Odedina; Benjamin C Lok; Peter Carek; Eric B Laber; Marie Davidian; Janice L Krieger Journal: J Clin Transl Sci Date: 2022-04-08