Literature DB >> 31119387

Pilot Study Assessing the Influence of Skin Type on the Heart Rate Measurements Obtained by Photoplethysmography with the Apple Watch.

Borja Sañudo1, Moisés De Hoyo2, Alejandro Muñoz-López3, John Perry4, Grant Abt5.   

Abstract

Photoplethysmographic imaging (PPG) is currently used to measure heart rate (HR) and the accuracy of PPG can be influenced by pigmentation of the skin; however, the effects of skin color-related artifacts on PPG during exercise remain unclear. This study aimed to assess the agreement between the Apple Watch photoplethysmography sensor and a criterion, for measuring heart rate across a range of intensities during exercise and to determine the influence of skin type on the accuracy of the measure. Forty-five males (20-43 y) completed the Fitzpatrick Skin Scale and were classified into three different skin type groups: a) types II (n = 15), III (n = 15) and IV (n = 15). Participants performed a graded incremental cycle-ergometer test while simultaneously wearing the Apple Watch and a Polar monitor as a criterion measure. Data from both devices were collected in 5-s epochs. Correlations between devices were very good (0.96-0.99 [95%CI: 0.94 to 0.99]). Significant differences were observed between skin types II and III when the intensity of the exercise was increased, albeit with trivial to small effect sizes (ES: 0.05 to 0.28). All significant differences corresponded to <2% of relative difference between both devices. Bland-Altman analyses showed a trivial but systematic underestimation of HR in the Apple Watch compared to Polar for all skin types during exercise. In conclusion, the Apple Watch accurately measures HR when cycling at different intensities and certain types of skin seem not to influence these measures, which may have important implications for controlling the intensity of exercise.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Agreement; Exercise; Heart rate; Skin type; Wearable sensors

Year:  2019        PMID: 31119387     DOI: 10.1007/s10916-019-1325-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Syst        ISSN: 0148-5598            Impact factor:   4.460


  5 in total

1.  Recommendations for determining the validity of consumer wearable heart rate devices: expert statement and checklist of the INTERLIVE Network.

Authors:  Jan M Mühlen; Julie Stang; Esben Lykke Skovgaard; Pedro B Judice; Pablo Molina-Garcia; William Johnston; Luís B Sardinha; Francisco B Ortega; Brian Caulfield; Wilhelm Bloch; Sulin Cheng; Ulf Ekelund; Jan Christian Brønd; Anders Grøntved; Moritz Schumann
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Photoplethysmogram Analysis and Applications: An Integrative Review.

Authors:  Junyung Park; Hyeon Seok Seok; Sang-Su Kim; Hangsik Shin
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 4.566

3.  Using wearable devices to generate real-world, individual-level data in rural, low-resource contexts in Burkina Faso, Africa: A case study.

Authors:  Sophie Huhn; Ina Matzke; Mara Koch; Hanns-Christian Gunga; Martina Anna Maggioni; Ali Sié; Valentin Boudo; Windpanga Aristide Ouedraogo; Guillaume Compaoré; Aditi Bunker; Rainer Sauerborn; Till Bärnighausen; Sandra Barteit
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-09-30

4.  Evaluations of Commercial Sleep Technologies for Objective Monitoring During Routine Sleeping Conditions.

Authors:  Jason D Stone; Lauren E Rentz; Jillian Forsey; Jad Ramadan; Rachel R Markwald; Victor S Finomore; Scott M Galster; Ali Rezai; Joshua A Hagen
Journal:  Nat Sci Sleep       Date:  2020-10-27

5.  Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Daniel Fuller; Emily Colwell; Jonathan Low; Kassia Orychock; Melissa Ann Tobin; Bo Simango; Richard Buote; Desiree Van Heerden; Hui Luan; Kimberley Cullen; Logan Slade; Nathan G A Taylor
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2020-09-08       Impact factor: 4.773

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.