Chong-Hyuk Choi1, Woo-Suk Lee2, Min Jung1, Hyun-Soo Moon1, Young-Han Lee3, Jongtaek Oh1, Sung-Jae Kim1,4, Sung-Hwan Kim5,6. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Severance Hospital, Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 2. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06237, Republic of Korea. 3. Department of Radiology, Severance Biomedical Science Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 4. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, YonseSarang Hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea. 5. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Severance Hospital, Arthroscopy and Joint Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea. orthohwan@gmail.com. 6. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06237, Republic of Korea. orthohwan@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: (1) To analyse popliteal artery (PA) movement in a three-dimensional (3D) coordinate system in relation to knee flexion and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) techniques (lateral closed wedge HTO [LCHTO], uniplane medial open wedge HTO [UP-MOHTO], biplane medial open wedge HTO [BP-MOHTO]) and (2) to identify safe zones of the PA in each osteotomy plane. METHODS: Sixteen knees of patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging with extension and 90° flexion were used to develop subject-specific 3D knee flexion models. Displacement of the PA during knee flexion was measured along the X- and Y-axis, as was the distance between the posterior tibial cortex and PA parallel to the Y-axis (d-PCA). Frontal plane safety index (FPSI) and maximal axial safe angles (MASA) of osteotomy, which represented safe zones for the osteotomy from the PA injury, were analysed. All measurements were performed along virtual osteotomy planes. Differences among the three osteotomy methods were analysed for each flexion angle using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: The average increments in d-PCA during knee flexion were 1.3 ± 2.3 mm in LCHTO (n.s.), 1.4 ± 1.2 mm in UP-MOHTO (P < 0.0001), and 1.7 ± 2.0 mm in BP-MOHTO (P = 0.015). The mean FPSIs in knee extension were 37.6 ± 5.9%, 46.4 ± 5.8%, and 45.1 ± 8.1% for LCHTO, UP-MOHTO, and BP-MOHTO, respectively. The mean MASA values in knee extension were 45.8° ± 4.4°, 37.3° ± 6.1°, and 38.9° ± 6.5° for LCHTO, UP-MOHTO, and BP-MOHTO, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the PA moved posteriorly during knee flexion, the small (1.7 mm) increment thereof and inconsistent movements in subjects would not be of clinical relevance to PA safety during HTO. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level II.
PURPOSE: (1) To analyse popliteal artery (PA) movement in a three-dimensional (3D) coordinate system in relation to knee flexion and high tibial osteotomy (HTO) techniques (lateral closed wedge HTO [LCHTO], uniplane medial open wedge HTO [UP-MOHTO], biplane medial open wedge HTO [BP-MOHTO]) and (2) to identify safe zones of the PA in each osteotomy plane. METHODS: Sixteen knees of patients who underwent magnetic resonance imaging with extension and 90° flexion were used to develop subject-specific 3D knee flexion models. Displacement of the PA during knee flexion was measured along the X- and Y-axis, as was the distance between the posterior tibial cortex and PA parallel to the Y-axis (d-PCA). Frontal plane safety index (FPSI) and maximal axial safe angles (MASA) of osteotomy, which represented safe zones for the osteotomy from the PA injury, were analysed. All measurements were performed along virtual osteotomy planes. Differences among the three osteotomy methods were analysed for each flexion angle using a linear mixed model. RESULTS: The average increments in d-PCA during knee flexion were 1.3 ± 2.3 mm in LCHTO (n.s.), 1.4 ± 1.2 mm in UP-MOHTO (P < 0.0001), and 1.7 ± 2.0 mm in BP-MOHTO (P = 0.015). The mean FPSIs in knee extension were 37.6 ± 5.9%, 46.4 ± 5.8%, and 45.1 ± 8.1% for LCHTO, UP-MOHTO, and BP-MOHTO, respectively. The mean MASA values in knee extension were 45.8° ± 4.4°, 37.3° ± 6.1°, and 38.9° ± 6.5° for LCHTO, UP-MOHTO, and BP-MOHTO, respectively. CONCLUSION: Although the PA moved posteriorly during knee flexion, the small (1.7 mm) increment thereof and inconsistent movements in subjects would not be of clinical relevance to PA safety during HTO. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic study, Level II.
Entities:
Keywords:
3-Dimensional analysis; Anatomy; Knee; Osteotomy; Vascular injury; Virtual surgery
Authors: Pak Lin Chin; Tze Tong Tey; Mohd Yusof Bin Ibrahim; Shi-Lu Chia; Seng Jin Yeo; Ngai Nung Lo Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2011-02-12 Impact factor: 4.757