| Literature DB >> 31118166 |
Yasuyuki Morita1, Toshihiro Sato1, Kouji Higashiura1, Yusho Hirano1, Fuga Matsubara1, Kanau Oshima1, Koji Niwa1, Yuhki Toku1, Guanbin Song2, Qing Luo2, Yang Ju3.
Abstract
In tendon tissue engineering, mechanical stimulus-induced differentiation is one of the most attractive techniques for stem cell-to-tenocyte differentiation in terms of cost, safety and simplicity. However, the most effective strain amplitude for differentiation using cyclic stretching remains unknown. Existing studies have not constrained cell reorientation behavior during cyclic stretching, resulting in uncertainty regarding the loads experienced by cells. In addition, strain distribution homogeneity of the culture membrane is important. Here, we improved the strain distribution uniformity of the membrane and employed a microgrooved membrane to suppress cell reorientation. Then we evaluated the most effective strain amplitude (0, 2, 4, 5, 6, or 8%) for the differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into tenocytes by measuring mRNA expression levels. The maximum expression of all tenogenic markers was observed at a 5% strain. These results contribute to tendon tissue engineering by clarifying the most effective strain amplitude during tenogenic differentiation induction using cyclic stretching.Entities:
Keywords: Differentiation; Human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cell (hBMSC); Mechanical stimulus; Tendon; Tenocyte; Tissue engineering
Year: 2019 PMID: 31118166 PMCID: PMC6550065 DOI: 10.1242/bio.039164
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biol Open ISSN: 2046-6390 Impact factor: 2.422
Fig. 1.Newly developed elastic chamber for cell culturing with cyclic stretching. (A) A commercially available PDMS chamber with thin sidewalls (2.5 mm, one side), in which the load can be applied from four points of support. (B) The commercial chamber takes the form of a bobbin due to the concentrated load through the four grappling rods and contraction due to Poisson's effect. (C) The newly developed PDMS chamber has thicker sidewalls (5 mm, one side) and can apply a uniformly distributed load, which (D) can reduce contraction caused by Poisson's effect and the bobbin-like deformation. The deformations in B and D are exaggerated for illustrative purposes. (E) The fabricated PDMS membrane has aligned microgrooves, which are 10 µm wide and 5 µm deep. (F) The normal strain distributions, ε and ε, of the membranes obtained from DIC analysis in both chambers when they are subjected to 8% strain in the x direction. The black areas indicate the unobtainable areas of the strains through the image processing. (G) The normal strain ε in the x-direction along the y-axis of the membrane when the chamber is subjected to 8% strain. The coordinate system is shown in F. The red and blue solid lines represent the normal strain ε of the newly developed chamber and the commercial chamber, respectively. (H) Comparison of the standard deviations in terms of strains, ε (left figure) and ε (right figure), between the newly developed chamber and commercial chamber, when the chambers are subjected to 8% strain. The standard deviations must be decreased if the chambers are subjected to less than 8% strain.
Fig. 3.mRNA expression levels under normal strain in the stretch direction, , of the newly developed elastic PDMS chamber. (A–F) show Scx, Mkx, Tnc, Col III, Col I and Runx2 expression, respectively. Data are normalized to the corresponding mRNA levels in unstretched cells on the plane elastic PDMS chamber (defined as 1). All data are expressed as the means±s.d. *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001. NS, not significant.
Fig. 4.mRNA expression levels in aligned and unstretched cells on the microgrooved elastic PDMS chamber. Data are normalized to the corresponding mRNA levels in unstretched cells on the plane elastic PDMS chamber (defined as 1). All data are expressed as the means±s.d. NS, not significant.
Cyclic stretching conditions