| Literature DB >> 31117278 |
Chanadol Supapong1, Anusorn Cherdthong2, Metha Wanapat3, Pin Chanjula4, Sutipong Uriyapongson5.
Abstract
The influence of sulfur included in fermented total mixed ration (FTMR) containing fresh cassava root on rumen characteristics, microbial protein synthesis, and blood metabolites in cattle was evaluated. Four Thai native beef cattle were randomly assigned according to a 2 × 2 factorial in a 4 × 4 Latin square design, and dietary treatments were as follows: factor A included a level of sulfur at 1% and 2% in total mixed ration, and factor B featured ensiling times at zero and 7 days. Digestibility of dry matter was increased when FTMR was supplemented with 2% sulfur. Blood thiocyanate increased by 69.5% when ensiling time was 7 days compared to no ensiling (p < 0.01). Bacterial populations were significantly different in the FTMR containing sulfur at 2% and 7 days of ensiling. Furthermore, microbial crude protein and efficiency of microbial protein synthesis were higher in the FTMR containing 2% sulfur and 7 days of ensiling (p < 0.01). Thus, high levels of hydrocyanic acid from fresh cassava root could be detoxified by a sulfur addition with an ensiling process to become nontoxic to cattle.Entities:
Keywords: energy source; mineral; rumen fermentation; ruminant; tropical feed
Year: 2019 PMID: 31117278 PMCID: PMC6562378 DOI: 10.3390/ani9050261
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Ingredients and chemical composition of fermented total mixed ration (FTMR) used in the experiment.
| Item | 1% Sulfur | 2% Sulfur | Fresh Cassava Root | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 Day Ensiling | 7 Days Ensiling | 0 Day Ensiling | 7 Days Ensiling | ||
| Ingredients, %DM | |||||
| Rice straw | 40.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 | |
| Fresh cassava root | 40.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 | 40.0 | |
| Soybean meal | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | 5.0 | |
| Palm kernel meal | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | |
| Rice bran | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | |
| Urea | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
| Pure sulfur | 1.0 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | |
| Mineral premix | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
| Molasses, liquid | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | 3.0 | |
| Salt | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |
| Chemical composition | |||||
| Dry matter, % | 55.1 | 55.8 | 55.0 | 55.3 | 32.0 |
| Organic matter, %DM | 95.4 | 95.5 | 95.7 | 96.0 | 92.6 |
| Ash, %DM | 4.6 | 4.5 | 4.3 | 4.0 | 7.4 |
| Crude protein, %DM | 12.6 | 12.8 | 11.6 | 11.7 | 2.1 |
| Neutral detergent fiber, %DM | 56.5 | 58.1 | 58.3 | 59.0 | 53.1 |
| Acid detergent fiber, %DM | 22.7 | 23.4 | 22.9 | 22.7 | 31.2 |
| pH | 6.11 | 6.08 | 5.11 | 4.27 | |
| HCN, ppm | 0.76 | 0.70 | 0.76 | 0.44 | 110.00 |
DM: Dry matter, and HCN: hydrocyanic acid.
Influence of FTMR on dry matter intake, nutrient intake, and digestibility coefficients in Thai native beef cattle.
| Item | 1% Sulfur | 2% Sulfur | SEM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 Day Ensiling | 7 Days Ensiling | 0 Day Ensiling | 7 Days Ensiling | S | E | S × E | ||
| Dry matter intake | ||||||||
| % BW | 3.5 | 3.6 | 3.3 | 3.5 | 0.38 | 0.39 | 0.39 | 0.82 |
| g/kg BW0.75 | 106.2 | 100.8 | 107.3 | 109.1 | 2.53 | 0.47 | 0.79 | 0.58 |
| Nutrient intake, kg/d | ||||||||
| Dry matter | 3.7 | 3.8 | 3.7 | 3.8 | 0.61 | 0.93 | 0.81 | 0.94 |
| Organic matter | 3.5 | 3.4 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 0.59 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.98 |
| Crude protein | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.22 | 0.84 | 0.88 | 0.99 |
| Neutral detergent fiber | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.27 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.89 |
| Acid detergent fiber | 0.2 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.17 | 0.42 | 0.75 | 0.67 |
| Estimated energy intake | ||||||||
| DOMI c, kg/d | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 2.3 | 0.47 | 0.88 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| DOMR d, kg/d | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.37 | 0.93 | 0.79 | 0.93 |
| ME, MJ/d | 8.8 | 8.6 | 8.8 | 8.7 | 0.92 | 0.92 | 0.87 | 0.99 |
| ME, MJ/kg DM | 2.6 | 2.5 | 2.6 | 2.5 | 0.45 | 0.95 | 0.76 | 0.95 |
| Digestibility coefficients | ||||||||
| Dry matter, % | 0.71 a | 0.71 a | 0.74 b | 0.73 b | 0.09 | 0.03 | 0.77 | 0.55 |
| Organic matter, %DM | 0.74 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.07 | 0.78 | 0.41 | 0.41 |
| Crude protein, %DM | 0.67 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.69 | 0.15 | 0.70 | 0.48 | 0.96 |
| Neutral detergent fiber, %DM | 0.65 | 0.64 | 0.65 | 0.65 | 0.14 | 0.73 | 1.00 | 0.81 |
| Acid detergent fiber, %DM | 0.39 | 0.38 | 0.40 | 0.41 | 0.13 | 0.29 | 0.76 | 0.44 |
S: p-value level of sulfur in the diet. E: p-value ensiling times in the diet. SEM: standard error of mean. a,b The mean was significantly different within rows (p < 0.05). BW: Body weight of Thai native beef cattle. c DOMI: Digestible organic matter intake. d DOMR: Digestible organic matter fermented in the rumen. ME: Metabolizable energy.
Effects of FTMR on rumen ecology, microorganisms, blood urea-nitrogen, and blood thiocyanate in Thai native beef cattle.
| Item | 1% Sulfur | 2% Sulfur | SEM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 Day Ensiling | 7 Days Ensiling | 0 Day Ensiling | 7 Days Ensiling | S | E | S × E | ||
| Rumen ecology | ||||||||
| Ruminal pH | 7.1 | 6.9 | 7.1 | 7.0 | 0.27 | 0.88 | 0.14 | 0.47 |
| Ruminal temperature, °C | 39.1 | 39.0 | 39.1 | 38.7 | 0.28 | 0.24 | 0.21 | 0.12 |
| NH3-N concentration, mg/dL | 21.0 a | 18.7 a | 16.3 b | 15.2 b | 1.21 | 0.02 | 0.26 | 0.70 |
| Ruminal microbes, cell/mL | ||||||||
| Protozoa, ×106 | 10.3 | 10.4 | 10.9 | 10.1 | 0.56 | 0.63 | 0.30 | 0.23 |
| Bacteria, ×109 | 35.1 a | 36.3 b | 35.8 b | 37.1 c | 0.14 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.70 |
| Blood parameters | ||||||||
| Blood urea-N concentration, mg/dL | 9.9 | 9.0 | 8.6 | 9.0 | 1.63 | 0.85 | 0.96 | 0.78 |
| Blood thiocyanate concentration, mg/dL | 10.8 a | 16.6 b | 13.3 a | 18.1 b | 1.36 | 0.26 | 0.01 | 0.78 |
S: p-value level of sulfur in diet. E: p-value ensiling times in diet. SEM: standard error of mean. a,b,c the mean was significantly different within rows (p < 0.05).
Effect of FTMR supplementation on nitrogen (N) balance and purine derivative.
| Item | 1% Sulfur | 2% Sulfur | SEM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 Day Ensiling | 7 Days Ensiling | 0 Day Ensiling | 7 Days Ensiling | S | E | S × E | ||
| N balance, g/d | ||||||||
| N intake | 77.8 | 76.7 | 79.5 | 78.5 | 2.79 | 0.83 | 0.89 | 0.10 |
| N excretion | 25.8 | 24.1 | 25.2 | 23.8 | 1.19 | 0.76 | 0.29 | 0.10 |
| Fecal excretion | ||||||||
| Output, kg/d | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.35 | 0.63 | 0.77 | 0.77 |
| Total N, g/d | 5.9 | 6.8 | 6.1 | 6.7 | 1.02 | 0.96 | 0.49 | 0.93 |
| Total N, %N excretion | 23.3 | 29.7 | 24.5 | 28.2 | 2.25 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.79 |
| Urinary excretion | ||||||||
| Output, L/d | 1.3 | 1.6 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 0.41 | 0.61 | 0.14 | 0.61 |
| Total N, g/d | 19.9 | 17.3 | 19.1 | 17.1 | 2.13 | 0.82 | 0.30 | 0.90 |
| Total N, % N excretion | 76.7 | 70.3 | 75.5 | 71.9 | 2.25 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.79 |
| N absorption | 71.9 | 69.9 | 73.5 | 71.8 | 2.81 | 0.83 | 0.82 | 0.99 |
| N retention | 52.0 | 52.7 | 54.3 | 54.7 | 2.62 | 0.76 | 0.94 | 0.98 |
| % of N retention to N intake | 66.5 | 68.3 | 67.5 | 69.0 | 1.50 | 0.70 | 0.48 | 0.96 |
| Purine derivative, mmol/day | ||||||||
| Excretion | 79.5 a | 136.2 c | 101.1 b | 140.1 c | 3.56 | 0.34 | 0.01 | 0.50 |
| Absorption | 59.1 a | 125.9 c | 84.5 b | 130.4 c | 3.86 | 0.34 | 0.01 | 0.50 |
| MCP, g/d | 271.5 a | 465.3 c | 345.2 b | 478.5 c | 6.58 | 0.34 | 0.01 | 0.50 |
| MCP (g/ digest OM kg) | 119.5 a | 212.0 c | 156.5 b | 211.6 c | 5.11 | 0.50 | 0.02 | 0.49 |
| EMPS | 18.4 a | 32.6 c | 24.1 b | 32.5 c | 2.00 | 0.50 | 0.02 | 0.49 |
S: p-value level of sulfur in diet. E: p -value ensiling times in diet. SEM: standard error of mean. a,b,c The mean was significantly different within rows (p < 0.05). MCP: microbial crude protein. EMPS: efficiency of microbial protein synthesis. N: Nitrogen.
Volatile fatty acid (VFA) of rumen fluid of Thai native beef cattle fed FTMR.
| Item | 1% Sulfur | 2% Sulfur | SEM | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 Day Ensiling | 7 Days Ensiling | 0 Day Ensiling | 7 Days Ensiling | S | E | S × E | ||
| Total VFA, mmol/L | 105.8 a | 110.3 b | 113.6 c | 113.8 c | 0.79 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| VFA profiles, mol/100 mol | ||||||||
| Acetic acid | 66.6 | 66.3 | 65.0 | 64.6 | 0.47 | 0.29 | 0.10 | 0.82 |
| Propionic acid | 21.6 a | 22.9 a | 25.3 b | 27.3 c | 0.29 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Butyric acid | 11.8 c | 10.9 c | 9.7 b | 8.1 a | 0.43 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.08 |
S: p-value level of sulfur in diet. E: p-value ensiling times in diet. SEM: standard error of mean. a,b,c The mean significantly differed within rows (p < 0.05). VFA: Volatile fatty acid.