| Literature DB >> 31117174 |
Khalil Eslami Jahromi1, Qing Pan2, Amir Khodabakhsh3, Cor Sikkens4, Paul Assman5, Simona M Cristescu6, Peter M Moselund7, Maxime Janssens8, Bert E Verlinden9, Frans J M Harren10.
Abstract
We present a fully integrated and transportable multi-species trace gas sensor based on a mid-infrared (MIR) supercontinuum light source. The high brightness (surpassing synchrotron) and ultra-broad spectral bandwidth (2-4 μm) of this light source allows simultaneous detection of multiple broadband absorbing gas species. High sensitivity in the sub-ppmv level has been achieved by utilizing an astigmatic multipass cell. A grating-based spectrometer at a scanning rate of 20 Hz is developed employing a balanced detection scheme. A multi-component global fitting algorithm is implemented into a central LabVIEW program to perform real-time data analysis. The obtained concentration values are validated by the standard gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC-MS) method. Field application of the sensor for quality control of stored fruits at a small scale is demonstrated, involving the detection of ethylene, ethanol, ethyl acetate, acetaldehyde, methanol, acetone, and water simultaneously. The sensor also shows promising potentials for other applications, such as environmental monitoring and biomedical research.Entities:
Keywords: broadband; fruit storage; mid-infrared; multi-species; real-time monitoring; supercontinuum; trace gas sensing
Year: 2019 PMID: 31117174 PMCID: PMC6566869 DOI: 10.3390/s19102334
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1Spectral power density of the SC light source integrated into the gas sensor.
Figure 2(A) Simplified schematic representation of the optical setup (M: mirror, BS: beam splitter, PD: photodetector). (B) Top view of the optical system. Note that the primary SC beam (highlighted in green) is split into the measurement (blue) and reference (red) beams.
Figure 3(A) Overview of the transportable and integrated gas sensing platform. (B) Schematic overview of the gas handling system.
Figure 4The reference absorbance (base-10) database at 1 ppmv level, including the targeted gas species. Note that water absorbance is inverted and re-scaled for clarity.
Figure 5Procedure overview of a two-stage global fitting method for concentration calculation.
Concentration overview of the gas mixture diluted from a calibration gas source containing nine species (second column) in comparison with the measurement results (fourth column).
| Compound Name | Calibrated Concentration (ppmv) | Diluted Concentration (Expected, ppmv) * | Measured Concentration (ppmv) ** |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethylene | 5000 ± 25 | ~19.5 | 19.5 ± 1.73 |
| Ethanol | 100 ± 0.5 | ~0.39 | 1.55 ± 0.38 |
| Acetaldehyde | 100 ± 5 | ~0.39 | 1.82 ± 0.64 |
| Methanol | 100 ± 1 | ~0.39 | 0.71 ± 0.19 |
| Ethyl-acetate | 100 ± 1 | ~0.39 | 0.60 ± 0.10 |
| Acetone | 100 ± 0.5 | ~0.39 | 0 |
| 1-propanol | 100 ± 1 | ~0.39 | N.A. |
| 2-butanone | 100 ± 5 | ~0.39 | N.A. |
| Propylene | 100 ± 1 | ~0.39 | N.A. |
| Propionaldehyde | 100 ± 5 | ~0.39 | N.A. |
* The uncertainty is obtained by taking the standard deviation of 18 independent measurements with one-minute averaging time. ** Dilution performed by injecting 20 mL of the calibrated source containing nine volatile species into a larger volume of 5.1 L N2 at atmospheric pressure.
Figure 6Comparison of the obtained concentration values using the optical method (red) and the TD-GC-MS method (green).
Figure 7Time-dependent representation of the obtained concentration values of multiple gas species based on the same pear-storage container. The breaking of the time axis is due to an alternating operation configuration to measure two different storage containers. For clarity purposes, the data of the other container are not shown.
Figure 8Measured (grey) and fitted (red) absorbance spectra associated with the first (A) and last (B) concentration data points in Figure 7. The residuals are included on the bottom. The green square in (B) highlights an increased ethanol concentration. A Savitzky–Golay filter is applied in the 2725–2821 cm−1 window in order to minimize the etalon effect due to optical elements.