Literature DB >> 31116893

Multicenter Comparison of Nonsupine Versus Supine Positioning During Intubation in the Emergency Department: A National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR) Study.

H Hill Stoecklein1, Christopher Kelly1, Amy H Kaji2, Andrea Fantegrossi3, Margaret Carlson1, Megan L Fix1, Troy Madsen1, Ron M Walls3, Calvin A Brown3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Head-up positioning for preoxygenation and ramping for morbidly obese patients are well-accepted techniques, but the effect of head-up positioning with full torso elevation for all intubations is controversial. We compared first-pass success, adverse events, and glottic view between supine (SP) and nonsupine (NSP) positioning for emergency department (ED) patients undergoing orotracheal intubation.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for ED intubations over a 2-year period from 25 participating centers in the National Emergency Airway Registry (NEAR). We compared characteristics and outcomes for adult patients intubated orotracheally in SP and NSP positions with either a direct or video laryngoscope. We report odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) for categorical variables and interquartile ranges with 95% CI for continuous variables. Our primary outcome was first-attempt intubation success and secondary outcomes were glottic views and peri-intubation adverse events.
RESULTS: Of 11,480 total intubations, 5.8% were performed in NSP. The NSP group included significantly more obese patients (OR = 2.2 [95% CI = 1.9-2.6]) and patients with a suspected difficult airway (OR = 1.8 [95% CI = 1.6-2.2]). First-pass success (adjusted OR = 1.1 [95% CI = 0.9-1.4]) and overall rate of grade I glottic views (OR = 1.1 [95% CI = 0.9-1.2]) were similar between groups while NSP had a significantly higher rate of grade I views when direct laryngoscopy was employed (OR = 1.27 [95% CI = 1.04-1.54]). NSP was associated with higher odds of any adverse event (OR = 1.4 [95% CI = 1.1-1.7]).
CONCLUSIONS: ED providers utilized SP in most ED intubations but were more likely to use NSP for patients who were obese or in whom they predicted a difficult airway. We found no differences in first-pass success between groups but total adverse events were more likely in NSP. A randomized trial comparing patient positioning during intubation in the ED is warranted.
© 2019 by the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31116893     DOI: 10.1111/acem.13805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Emerg Med        ISSN: 1069-6563            Impact factor:   3.451


  1 in total

1.  Impact of bed angle and height on intubation success during simulated endotracheal intubation in the ramped position.

Authors:  Dhimitri A Nikolla; Ryann R Beaumont; Jessica L Lerman; Joseph S Datsko; Jestin N Carlson
Journal:  J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open       Date:  2020-03-13
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.