Literature DB >> 31116447

Plant traits moderate pollen limitation of introduced and native plants: a phylogenetic meta-analysis of global scale.

Jean H Burns1, Joanne M Bennett2,3, Junmin Li4, Jing Xia5, Gerardo Arceo-Gómez6, Martin Burd7, Laura A Burkle8, Walter Durka3,9, Allan G Ellis10, Leandro Freitas11, James G Rodger10,12, Jana C Vamosi13, Marina Wolowski14, Tia-Lynn Ashman15, Tiffany M Knight2,3,9, Janette A Steets16.   

Abstract

The role of pollination in the success of invasive plants needs to be understood because invasives have substantial effects on species interactions and ecosystem functions. Previous research has shown both that reproduction of invasive plants is often pollen limited and that invasive plants can have high seed production, motivating the questions: How do invasive populations maintain reproductive success in spite of pollen limitation? What species traits moderate pollen limitation for invaders? We conducted a phylogenetic meta-analysis with 68 invasive, 50 introduced noninvasive and 1931 native plant populations, across 1249 species. We found that invasive populations with generalist pollination or pollinator dependence were less pollen limited than natives, but invasives and introduced noninvasives did not differ. Invasive species produced 3× fewer ovules/flower and >250× more flowers per plant, compared with their native relatives. While these traits were negatively correlated, consistent with a tradeoff, this did not differ with invasion status. Invasive plants that produce many flowers and have floral generalisation are able to compensate for or avoid pollen limitation, potentially helping to explain the invaders' reproductive successes.
© 2019 The Authors. New Phytologist © 2019 New Phytologist Trust.

Keywords:  alien plants; invasion; meta-analysis; mutualists; plant reproduction; plant-pollinator interactions; pollen limitation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31116447     DOI: 10.1111/nph.15935

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  New Phytol        ISSN: 0028-646X            Impact factor:   10.151


  5 in total

1.  Does pollen limitation limit plant ranges? Evidence and implications.

Authors:  Emma Dawson-Glass; Anna L Hargreaves
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2022-01-24       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Heterospecific pollination by an invasive congener threatens the native American bittersweet, Celastrus scandens.

Authors:  David N Zaya; Stacey A Leicht-Young; Noel B Pavlovic; Mary V Ashley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Widespread vulnerability of flowering plant seed production to pollinator declines.

Authors:  James G Rodger; Joanne M Bennett; Mialy Razanajatovo; Tiffany M Knight; Mark van Kleunen; Tia-Lynn Ashman; Janette A Steets; Cang Hui; Gerardo Arceo-Gómez; Martin Burd; Laura A Burkle; Jean H Burns; Walter Durka; Leandro Freitas; Jurene E Kemp; Junmin Li; Anton Pauw; Jana C Vamosi; Marina Wolowski; Jing Xia; Allan G Ellis
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-10-13       Impact factor: 14.136

4.  Weedy and seedy: the rapid evolution of life-history characteristics in an introduced daisy.

Authors:  Claire R Brandenburger; Ben Maslen; William B Sherwin; Angela T Moles
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.138

5.  Breeding systems of naturalized versus indigenous species provide support for Baker's law on Pohnpei island.

Authors:  Viann Marie Harmony Yomai; Joseph Hill Williams
Journal:  AoB Plants       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 3.276

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.