Literature DB >> 31116186

Five-year results from a randomised controlled trial comparing prostheses supported by 5-mm long implants or by longer implants in augmented bone in posterior atrophic edentulous jaws.

Pietro Felice, Carlo Barausse, Roberto Pistilli, Daniela Rita Ippolito, Marco Esposito.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether 5-mm short dental implants could be an alternative to augmentation with anorganic bovine bone and placement of at least 10-mm long implants in posterior atrophic jaws.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen patients with bilateral atrophic mandibles (5 to 7 mm bone height above the mandibular canal) and 15 patients with bilateral atrophic maxillae (4 to 6 mm bone height below the maxillary sinus), and bone thickness of at least 8 mm, were randomised according to a split-mouth design to receive one to three 5-mm short implants or at least 10-mm long implants in augmented bone. Mandibles were vertically augmented with interpositional bone blocks and maxillary sinuses with particulated bone via a lateral window. Implants were placed after 4 months, submerged and loaded, after another 4 months, with provisional prostheses. Four months later, definitive provisionally cemented prostheses were delivered. Outcome measures were: prosthesis and implant failures, any complication and peri-implant marginal bone level changes.
RESULTS: In five augmented mandibles the planned 10-mm long implants could not be placed and shorter implants (7.0 and 8.5 mm) had to be used instead. Five years after loading, six patients, five treated in the mandible and one in the maxilla, dropped out. Three prostheses (one mandibular and two maxillary) failed in the short-implant group versus none in the long-implant group. In mandibles one long implant failed versus two short implants in one patient. In maxillae one long implant failed versus three short implants in two patients. There were no statistically significant differences in implant (n = 26; P = 1.00, difference = 3.85%, 95% CI: -12.95% to 20.64%) and prosthetic (n = 26; P = 0.250, difference = 11.54%, 95% CI: -0.74% to 23.82%) failures. Eleven patients had 16 complications at short implants (one patient accounted for six complications) and 12 patients had 14 complications at long implants. There were no statistically significant differences in complications (n = 28; P = 1.00, difference = -3.57%, 95% CI: -30.65% to 23.51%). Five years after loading, patients with mandibular implants lost on average 1.72 mm at short implants and 2.10 mm at long implants of peri-implant marginal bone. This difference was statistically significant (difference = 0.37 ± 0.43 mm; 95% CI: 0.07 to 0.68 mm; P = 0.022). In maxillae, patients lost on average 1.31 mm at short implants and 1.79 mm at long implants. This difference was statistically significant (difference = 0.48 ± 0.43 mm; 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.74 mm; P = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: Five years after loading, 5-mm short implants achieved similar results to longer implants in augmented bone. The choice of short implants might be preferable to vertical bone augmentation, especially in mandibles, since the treatment is faster and cheaper.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bovine anorganic bone; inlay graft; short dental implants; sinus elevation; vertical augmentation

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31116186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Implantol (Berl)        ISSN: 2631-6420


  6 in total

Review 1.  Short Implants versus Longer Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials with a Post-Loading Follow-Up Duration of 5 Years.

Authors:  Miaozhen Wang; Feng Liu; Christian Ulm; Huidan Shen; Xiaohui Rausch-Fan
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.748

2.  Short versus Standard Length Implants with Sinus Floor Elevation for the Atrophic Posterior Maxilla.

Authors:  Eik Schiegnitz; Nina Hill; Keyvan Sagheb; Jochem König; Kawe Sagheb; Bilal Al-Nawas
Journal:  Acta Stomatol Croat       Date:  2022-06

3.  Prospective, Clinical Pilot Study with Eleven 4-Mm Extra-Short Implants Splinted to Longer Implants for Posterior Maxilla Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Daniel Torassa; Pablo Naldini; José Luis Calvo-Guirado; Enrique Fernández-Bodereau
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 4.241

4.  A meta-analysis indicating extra-short implants (≤ 6 mm) as an alternative to longer implants (≥ 8 mm) with bone augmentation.

Authors:  Xiaoran Yu; Ruogu Xu; Zhengchuan Zhang; Yang Yang; Feilong Deng
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Survival of surface-modified short versus long implants in complete or partially edentulous patients with a follow-up of 1 year or more: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Raghavendra Shrishail Medikeri; Marisca Austin Pereira; Manjushri Waingade; Shwetambari Navale
Journal:  J Periodontal Implant Sci       Date:  2022-08       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Dynamic Navigated "Sandwich" Technique: A Novel Surgical Approach for Safe Osteotomies in the Rehabilitation of an Atrophic Posterior Mandible: A Case Report.

Authors:  Pietro Felice; Lorenzo Bonifazi; Maryia Karaban; Cesare Berti; Gerardo Pellegrino; Carlo Barausse
Journal:  Methods Protoc       Date:  2021-05-16
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.