Literature DB >> 31116157

Easy conversion of cardio-ankle vascular index into CAVI0: influence of scale coefficients.

Bart Spronck1,2, Michal Mestanik3,4, Ingrid Tonhajzerova4,3, Alexander Jurko5, Isabella Tan6, Mark Butlin6, Alberto P Avolio6.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31116157      PMCID: PMC6686965          DOI: 10.1097/HJH.0000000000002166

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hypertens        ISSN: 0263-6352            Impact factor:   4.844


× No keyword cloud information.
In this correspondence, we briefly explain how details on cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI; [1]) as recently released by Fukuda Denshi [2] can be used to convert CAVI into CAVI0[3]. We provide an easy-to-use PDF calculator as well as a Microsoft Excel workbook to facilitate this process (Supplemental digital content 1 and 2). We have recently investigated the theoretical blood pressure dependence of cardio-ankle vascular index as measured using the VaSera device (Fukuda Denshi Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan) and proposed a novel, corrected index: CAVI0[3]. Direct conversion between CAVI and CAVI0 proved difficult, as the CAVI equation contains two proprietary scale coefficients a and b[1]: with PWV the pulse wave velocity from the heart to the left or right ankle (resulting in L-CAVI or R-CAVI, respectively), Ps and Pd the SBP and DBP as measured by the VaSera device at the right upper arm (regardless of computing L-CAVI or R-CAVI [2,4]), and the blood mass density [2]. We previously set out to estimate scale coefficients a and b from measurement data [4]. Such method, however, necessarily has the limitation that a and b can only be obtained approximately and not exactly. Recently, Fukuda Denshi fully disclosed the values of a and b, as well as other details on the calculation of CAVI [2] – a step that should be applauded. This disclosure allows for a direct, exact conversion of CAVI into CAVI0: with Pref = 100 mmHg a reference pressure [3]. The values of a and b in the CAVI equation are different for different ranges of CAVI [2]. Two cut-off points are implemented, resulting in three sets of values for the coefficients a and b. Figure 1 visualizes these variable scaling coefficients, as well as the cut-off points in CAVI and unscaled CAVI. This also implies that, when converting CAVI to CAVI0 (Eq. 2), the values for a and b should be matched to the measured value of CAVI.
FIGURE 1

Influence of the use of three sets of scale coefficients a and b[2] on the relationship (y = ax + b) between cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI, y) and unscaled CAVI (x).

Influence of the use of three sets of scale coefficients a and b[2] on the relationship (y = ax + b) between cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI, y) and unscaled CAVI (x). To simplify the CAVI-to-CAVI0 conversion process, we created an easily fillable Adobe PDF form for conversion of single CAVI measurements (Fig. 2, Supplemental digital content 1) as well as a Microsoft Excel workbook for conversion of larger data sets (Supplemental digital content 2). Note that the PDF form was designed to be opened using Adobe Reader (http://www.adobe.com/go/getreader); other PDF readers may not support in-PDF calculations.
FIGURE 2

Screenshot of Adobe PDF CAVI-to-CAVI0 conversion tool with a completed CAVI-to-CAVI0 conversion (Supplemental digital content 1). The user enters CAVI and SBP and DBP values (Ps and Pd) in the light boxes, after which the form automatically determines the appropriate scale coefficients (a and b), determines unscaled CAVIs, and converts those to CAVI0s. CAVI, cardio-ankle vascular index; CAVI0, cardio-ankle vascular index zero [3]; Pref, reference pressure [3].

Screenshot of Adobe PDF CAVI-to-CAVI0 conversion tool with a completed CAVI-to-CAVI0 conversion (Supplemental digital content 1). The user enters CAVI and SBP and DBP values (Ps and Pd) in the light boxes, after which the form automatically determines the appropriate scale coefficients (a and b), determines unscaled CAVIs, and converts those to CAVI0s. CAVI, cardio-ankle vascular index; CAVI0, cardio-ankle vascular index zero [3]; Pref, reference pressure [3]. The critical reader is pointed to some nomenclature variations: in this correspondence, CAVI as provided by the VaSera device is simply termed CAVI; our previous studies referred to it as CAVIVS[3,4]. Unscaled CAVI (this correspondence) is called haβ by Takahashi et al.[2] and was referred to simply as CAVI in our previous studies [3,4]. Finally, we would like to point out that a researcher with full access to the CAVI (VaSera) source data can also compute CAVI0 (Eqs. 9 and 10 in [4]) without CAVI as an intermediate step. In conclusion, we hope that this correspondence and the tools provided will help every user interested in using CAVI0 – whether clinician, researcher, or engineer – to easily convert CAVI into CAVI0 values.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

This work was supported by grants from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (Rubicon 452172006) and the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement 793805). Suggestions by Dr Elien B. Engels are gratefully acknowledged.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.
  4 in total

1.  Arterial stiffness index beta and cardio-ankle vascular index inherently depend on blood pressure but can be readily corrected.

Authors:  Bart Spronck; Alberto P Avolio; Isabella Tan; Mark Butlin; Koen D Reesink; Tammo Delhaas
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.844

2.  A novel blood pressure-independent arterial wall stiffness parameter; cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI).

Authors:  Kohji Shirai; Junji Utino; Kuniaki Otsuka; Masanobu Takata
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 4.928

3.  Direct means of obtaining CAVI0-a corrected cardio-ankle vascular stiffness index (CAVI)-from conventional CAVI measurements or their underlying variables.

Authors:  Bart Spronck; Michal Mestanik; Ingrid Tonhajzerova; Alexander Jurko; Tomas Jurko; Alberto P Avolio; Mark Butlin
Journal:  Physiol Meas       Date:  2017-09-21       Impact factor: 2.833

4.  Coefficients in the CAVI Equation and the Comparison Between CAVI With and Without the Coefficients Using Clinical Data.

Authors:  Koji Takahashi; Tomoyuki Yamamoto; Shinichi Tsuda; Fumio Okabe; Tadashi Shimose; Yoshinori Tsuji; Kenji Suzuki; Kuniaki Otsuka; Masanobu Takata; Kazuhiro Shimizu; Junji Uchino; Kohji Shirai
Journal:  J Atheroscler Thromb       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.928

  4 in total
  7 in total

1.  Evaluation of the calculation formulas of the cardio-ankle vascular index used in the Japanese apparatus.

Authors:  Dai Ato
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2019-09-13

2.  Thoracic Aorta Diameter Calculation by Artificial Intelligence Can Predict the Degree of Arterial Stiffness.

Authors:  Yaoling Wang; Jinrong Yang; Yichen Lu; Wenliang Fan; Lijuan Bai; Zhuang Nie; Ruiyun Wang; Jie Yu; Lihua Liu; Yun Liu; Linfeng He; Kai Wen; Li Chen; Fan Yang; Benling Qi
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-15

3.  Predictive Ability of Pressure-Corrected Arterial Stiffness Indices: Comparison of Pulse Wave Velocity, Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI), and CAVI0.

Authors:  Bart Spronck; Mary Jo Obeid; Mahati Paravathaneni; Naga Vaishnavi Gadela; Gurpreet Singh; Caroline A Magro; Varsha Kulkarni; Soumya Kondaveety; Keerthi Chandrika Gade; Rushik Bhuva; Colin M Kulick-Soper; Nicolas Sanchez; Scott Akers; Julio A Chirinos
Journal:  Am J Hypertens       Date:  2022-03-08       Impact factor: 2.689

4.  Predictive ability of arterial stiffness parameters for renal function decline: a retrospective cohort study comparing cardio-ankle vascular index, pulse wave velocity and cardio-ankle vascular index 0.

Authors:  Daiji Nagayama; Kentaro Fujishiro; Toru Miyoshi; Shigeo Horinaka; Kenji Suzuki; Kazuhiro Shimizu; Atsuhito Saiki; Kohji Shirai
Journal:  J Hypertens       Date:  2022-06-10       Impact factor: 4.776

5.  The Correlation of Arterial Stiffness Parameters with Aging and Comorbidity Burden.

Authors:  Francesco Fantin; Anna Giani; Monica Trentin; Andrea P Rossi; Elena Zoico; Gloria Mazzali; Rocco Micciolo; Mauro Zamboni
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.964

6.  Using the Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) or the Mathematical Correction Form (CAVI0) in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Javad Alizargar; Nan-Chen Hsieh; Shu-Fang Vivienne Wu; Shih-Yen Weng
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-03-31       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Reply to Comments: Using the Cardio-Ankle Vascular Index (CAVI) or the Mathematical Correction Form (CAVI0) in Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Bart Spronck; Alexander Jurko; Michal Mestanik; Alberto P Avolio; Ingrid Tonhajzerova
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-04-10       Impact factor: 5.923

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.