Marc Pineton de Chambrun1,2, Nicolas Bréchot1,2, Alain Combes1,2. 1. Service de médecine intensive-réanimation, Institut de Cardiologie, APHP Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière. 2. Sorbonne Université, INSERM, UMRS 1166-ICAN, Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition, Paris, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Temporary circulatory support (TCS) with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used as a salvage therapy for patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. This article provides an overview of VA-ECMO principles, indications, management, complications, and discusses the results of recent case series and trials. RECENT FINDINGS: VA-ECMO is utilized as a bridge to 'decision' that includes weaning after cardiac function recovery, transplantation, long-term mechanical circulatory support, and withdrawal in case of futility. VA-ECMO is considered the first-line TCS as it allows rapid improvement in oxygenation, is less expensive, and is also suitable for patients with biventricular failure. Combining Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) or intra-aortic balloon pump support with VA-ECMO might decrease left ventricular pressure and improve outcomes. Massive pulmonary embolism, sepsis-associated cardiomyopathy, and refractory cardiac arrest are among emerging indications for TCS. SUMMARY: TCS have become the cornerstone of the management of patients with cardiogenic shock, although the evidence supporting their efficacy is limited. VA-ECMO is considered the first-line option, with a growing number of accepted and emerging indications. Randomized clinical trials are now needed to determine the place VA-ECMO in cardiogenic shock treatment strategies.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Temporary circulatory support (TCS) with venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is increasingly used as a salvage therapy for patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. This article provides an overview of VA-ECMO principles, indications, management, complications, and discusses the results of recent case series and trials. RECENT FINDINGS: VA-ECMO is utilized as a bridge to 'decision' that includes weaning after cardiac function recovery, transplantation, long-term mechanical circulatory support, and withdrawal in case of futility. VA-ECMO is considered the first-line TCS as it allows rapid improvement in oxygenation, is less expensive, and is also suitable for patients with biventricular failure. Combining Impella (Abiomed, Danvers, MA, USA) or intra-aortic balloon pump support with VA-ECMO might decrease left ventricular pressure and improve outcomes. Massive pulmonary embolism, sepsis-associated cardiomyopathy, and refractory cardiac arrest are among emerging indications for TCS. SUMMARY:TCS have become the cornerstone of the management of patients with cardiogenic shock, although the evidence supporting their efficacy is limited. VA-ECMO is considered the first-line option, with a growing number of accepted and emerging indications. Randomized clinical trials are now needed to determine the place VA-ECMO in cardiogenic shock treatment strategies.
Authors: István Ferenc Édes; Balázs Tamás Németh; István Hartyánszky; Bálint Szilveszter; Péter Kulyassa; Levente Fazekas; Miklós Pólos; Endre Németh; Dávid Becker; Béla Merkely Journal: Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej Date: 2021-09-13 Impact factor: 1.426
Authors: Sebastian D Sahli; Alexander Kaserer; Donat R Spahn; Markus J Wilhelm; Julia Braun; Maximilian Halbe; Yuliya Dahlem; Muriel A Spahn; Julian Rössler; Bernard Krüger; Francesco Maisano Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2022-06 Impact factor: 3.005
Authors: Dirk von Lewinski; Lukas Herold; Christian Stoffel; Sascha Pätzold; Friedrich Fruhwald; Siegfried Altmanninger-Sock; Ewald Kolesnik; Markus Wallner; Peter Rainer; Heiko Bugger; Nicolas Verheyen; Ursula Rohrer; Martin Manninger-Wünscher; Daniel Scherr; Dietmar Renz; Ameli Yates; Andreas Zirlik; Gabor G Toth Journal: Catheter Cardiovasc Interv Date: 2022-07-13 Impact factor: 2.585
Authors: Daniel Drewniak; Giovanna Brandi; Philipp Karl Buehler; Peter Steiger; Niels Hagenbuch; Sabine Stamm-Balderjahn; Liane Schenk; Ana Rosca; Tanja Krones Journal: Med Decis Making Date: 2021-10-23 Impact factor: 2.583