| Literature DB >> 31115371 |
Sidharth Totadri1, Amita Trehan1, Appinderjit Kaur1, Deepak Bansal1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND &Entities:
Keywords: Area remoteness; childhood leukaemia; demographic factors; illiteracy; treatment adherence; treatment default; treatment-related mortality
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31115371 PMCID: PMC6507537 DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.IJMR_579_17
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Indian J Med Res ISSN: 0971-5916 Impact factor: 2.375
Baseline demographic factors in the patients
| Parameter | n (%) (n=308) | Proportion of patients with events, n (%) |
|---|---|---|
| Sex | ||
| Male | 221 (72) | 83 (38) |
| Female | 87 (28) | 35 (40) |
| Weight | ||
| Underweight | 95 (31) | 81 (38) |
| Normal | 213 (69) | 37 (39) |
| Regimen | ||
| Standard risk | 189 (34) | 64 (34) |
| High-risk | 119 | 54 (45) |
| Socio-economic class | ||
| Upper | 85 (28) | 25 (29) |
| Middle | 68 (22) | 29 (43) |
| Lower | 155 (50) | 64 (41) |
| Educational statusa | ||
| Graduate (paternal) | 75 (25) | 23 (31) |
| High school passed | 118 (39) | 49 (41) |
| Not passed high school | 112 (37) | 45 (40) |
| Educational statusb | ||
| Graduate (maternal) | 62 (20) | 19 (31) |
| High school passed | 113 (37) | 50 (44) |
| Not passed high school | 131 (43) | 48 (37) |
| Residence | ||
| Urban | 198 (64) | 82 (41) |
| Rural | 110 (36) | 36 (33) |
| Distance between residence and hospital (km) | ||
| <50 | 65 (21) | 21 (32) |
| 50-200 | 133 (43) | 53 (40) |
| >200 | 110 (36) | 44 (40) |
a3 patients had lost their fathers, b2 patients had lost their mothers
Fig. 1Black line: Upper socio-economic status, dotted line: Middle socio-economic status, dashed line: Lower socio-economic status. (A and B) Illustrate the event-free survival and overall survival for the entire group of patients. The Tables below the figures illustrate the number of patients at the end of each year who are at risk for events.
Cox proportional hazard ratio model for the outcome of mortality
| Predictor | Reference group | Hazard ratio | 95 per cent CI | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Underweight | Normal weight | 1.98 | 1.08-3.63 | 0.027 |
| High-risk regimen | Standard risk regimen | 1.80 | 1.12-2.89 | 0.015 |
| Low socio-economic status | Middle/upper socio-economic status | 0.86 | 0.51-1.44 | 0.562 |
| Residence >200 km from treating centre | Residence within 200 km of treating centre | 0.96 | 0.59-1.56 | 0.857 |
| Rural residence | Urban residence | 0.90 | 0.52-1.57 | 0.711 |
CI, confidence interval
Fig. 2Black line: Upper socio-economic status, dotted line: Middle socio-economic status, dashed line: Lower socio-economic status. (A and B) Illustrate the event-free survival and overall survival for the patients who achieved remission after completing induction therapy. Tables below the figures illustrate the number of patients at the end of each year who are at risk for events.