Literature DB >> 31114843

CytoPacq: a web-interface for simulating multi-dimensional cell imaging.

David Wiesner1, David Svoboda1, Martin Maška1, Michal Kozubek1.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Objective assessment of bioimage analysis methods is an essential step towards understanding their robustness and parameter sensitivity, calling for the availability of heterogeneous bioimage datasets accompanied by their reference annotations. Because manual annotations are known to be arduous, highly subjective and barely reproducible, numerous simulators have emerged over past decades, generating synthetic bioimage datasets complemented with inherent reference annotations. However, the installation and configuration of these tools generally constitutes a barrier to their widespread use.
RESULTS: We present a modern, modular web-interface, CytoPacq, to facilitate the generation of synthetic benchmark datasets relevant for multi-dimensional cell imaging. CytoPacq poses a user-friendly graphical interface with contextual tooltips and currently allows a comfortable access to various cell simulation systems of fluorescence microscopy, which have already been recognized and used by the scientific community, in a straightforward and self-contained form.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: CytoPacq is a publicly available online service running at https://cbia.fi.muni.cz/simulator. More information about it as well as examples of generated bioimage datasets are available directly through the web-interface. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31114843      PMCID: PMC6821329          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz417

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


1 Introduction

Ceaseless advances in optical microscopy and fluorescent labelling facilitate in vivo studies of cells and their populations. Consequently, as the amounts of acquired bioimage data increase, the need for accurate and robust bioimage analysis raises. This motivates the development of automated image analysis methods to process vast amount of data without the need of manual intervention (Cardona and Tomancak, 2012; Carpenter ). A high demand for automated methods in quantitative microscopy calls for defining objective criteria for their evaluation. To properly evaluate results and performance of bioimage analysis algorithms, suitable benchmark datasets are needed together with their reference annotations (Ljosa ). One can obtain such datasets by carefully selecting a reasonable number of naturally varying real bioimages and letting the experts manually annotate them. This is, however, a laborious task with a potential incoherence of results between various specialists (Coutu and Schroeder, 2013), limiting the public availability of such datasets (Kozubek, 2016). To alleviate the existing difficulties, there is an ongoing development of simulators capable of generating synthetic bioimage datasets with accompanying reference annotations as a natural by-product of the underlying simulation processes (Murphy, 2016; Ulman ). These simulators often implement complex computational models, allowing in silico generation of multi-dimensional bioimage data of a high resemblance to real biological specimens acquired using an optical microscope (Chenouard ; Sage ; Sorokin ; Svoboda and Ulman, 2017). As the internal complexity of simulation systems naturally increases, working with them becomes progressively more demanding. Setting up these tools generally involves a laborious installation process, often coupled with requirements for a specific operating system and third-party libraries of specific versions. Furthermore, configuration and operation of these tools usually implicate arduous work with a particular programming language or command line interface and a detailed knowledge of complex configuration parameters related to the employed computational models. In this paper, we present CytoPacq, a modular web-interface for generating synthetic benchmark datasets of various cytology-centric 3D digital phantoms (Svoboda ), supporting different configurations of the optical system and acquisition devices, including time-lapse imaging. The web-interface allows users to conveniently configure the whole simulation process by controlling the most important parameters only and by navigating their steps using informative tooltips. Furthermore, advanced options are also available for experienced users, allowing for a detailed configuration of the underlying computational models. The modular architecture built from the ground up with the future-proofing in mind allows the integration of new simulation modules as they become available. The currently implemented simulation modules have already been published and utilized for the generation of bioimage data in multiple on-going, well-established and open-science-supporting research projects. Datasets, generated using the simulation modules in CytoPacq, have already been used for benchmarking of segmentation and tracking algorithms submitted to the Cell Tracking Challenge (Maška ; Ulman ), evaluation of image analysis algorithms during development of CellProfiler (McQuin ), quantitative assessment of segmentation quality (Stegmaier ), validation of image reconstruction via blind deconvolution estimating an unknown point spread function (Keuper ) as well as for training of widespread deep-learning approaches (Castilla ). Furthermore, the datasets are also included in the well-recognized Broad Bioimage Benchmark Collection (https://data.broadinstitute.org/bbbc).

2 Methods and implementation

The CytoPacq web-interface separates configuration parameters into three groups (Fig. 1), depending on the functionality of underlying modules: 3D digital phantom simulation that generates spatial objects of interest and their structure; optical system simulation that models image formation in the optical system; and finally acquisition device simulation that mimics the phenomena occurring during image capture when using digital image detectors.
Fig. 1.

A screenshot of the CytoPacq web-interface. The configuration form is divided into three sections, corresponding to the underlying simulation modules

A screenshot of the CytoPacq web-interface. The configuration form is divided into three sections, corresponding to the underlying simulation modules The currently available simulation modules for fluorescently labelled 3D digital phantoms are CytoGen (Svoboda ), MitoGen (Svoboda and Ulman, 2017) and FiloGen (Sorokin ), generating 3D static digital phantoms of microspheres, HL-60 cell nuclei, granulocyte nuclei and colon tissues, 3D time-lapse digital phantoms of mitotically dividing HL-60 cells, and 3D time-lapse digital phantoms of single lung cancer cells with growing and branching filopodial protrusions, respectively. The simulation of a blurring process occurring in the optical system is realized in the OptiGen module (Svoboda ) via an experimentally measured point spread function. And finally, an image acquisition process is mimicked by the AcquiGen module (Svoboda ) by including various types of noise and phenomena like sampling and quantization. At present, the web-interface offers a selection of 40 distinct virtual optical system configurations and 6 virtual acquisition devices, available through the internal database. CytoPacq is an online service, running all simulations on the dedicated computational servers, thus circumventing the requirement for a powerful workstation on the user side. However, we also endorse the possibility of locally installing the underlying simulation modules on private workstations, thus giving more experienced users complete control over the simulation process, as detailed in the Supplementary Material.

3 Concluding remarks

CytoPacq facilitates the generation of theoretically unlimited amount of heterogeneous, completely annotated bioimage data, thus being a valuable resource for objective benchmarking of bioimage analysis methods. Being developed and maintained as a part of the Euro-BioImaging infrastructure (http://www.eurobioimaging.eu) as well as in the frame of COST NEUBIAS networking project (http://neubias.org), its continuous development is well motivated to reflect the needs of the bioimaging community. The modular architecture of CytoPacq opens avenues for integrating new features into it, such as the ability to render multi-channel bioimage data, the support for label-free microscopy modalities, or the possibility of adding new digital phantoms.

Funding

This work was supported by the Czech Science Foundation under the grant No. GA17-05048S (M. M., D. S.), and by the Czech Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports under the grants No. LM2015062 (D. W.), No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_013/0001775 (M. K.), and No. LTC17016 (D. S.). Conflict of Interest: none declared. Click here for additional data file.
  17 in total

1.  A call for bioimaging software usability.

Authors:  Anne E Carpenter; Lee Kamentsky; Kevin W Eliceiri
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 28.547

2.  Quantitative evaluation of software packages for single-molecule localization microscopy.

Authors:  Daniel Sage; Hagai Kirshner; Thomas Pengo; Nico Stuurman; Junhong Min; Suliana Manley; Michael Unser
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2015-06-15       Impact factor: 28.547

3.  FiloGen: A Model-Based Generator of Synthetic 3-D Time-Lapse Sequences of Single Motile Cells With Growing and Branching Filopodia.

Authors:  Dmitry V Sorokin; Igor Peterlik; Vladimir Ulman; David Svoboda; Tereza Necasova; Katsiarina Morgaenko; Livia Eiselleova; Lenka Tesarova; Martin Maska
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 4.  Building cell models and simulations from microscope images.

Authors:  Robert F Murphy
Journal:  Methods       Date:  2015-10-17       Impact factor: 3.608

Review 5.  Challenges and Benchmarks in Bioimage Analysis.

Authors:  Michal Kozubek
Journal:  Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.231

6.  Objective comparison of particle tracking methods.

Authors:  Nicolas Chenouard; Ihor Smal; Fabrice de Chaumont; Martin Maška; Ivo F Sbalzarini; Yuanhao Gong; Janick Cardinale; Craig Carthel; Stefano Coraluppi; Mark Winter; Andrew R Cohen; William J Godinez; Karl Rohr; Yannis Kalaidzidis; Liang Liang; James Duncan; Hongying Shen; Yingke Xu; Klas E G Magnusson; Joakim Jaldén; Helen M Blau; Perrine Paul-Gilloteaux; Philippe Roudot; Charles Kervrann; François Waharte; Jean-Yves Tinevez; Spencer L Shorte; Joost Willemse; Katherine Celler; Gilles P van Wezel; Han-Wei Dan; Yuh-Show Tsai; Carlos Ortiz de Solórzano; Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin; Erik Meijering
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2014-01-19       Impact factor: 28.547

7.  An objective comparison of cell-tracking algorithms.

Authors:  Vladimír Ulman; Martin Maška; Klas E G Magnusson; Olaf Ronneberger; Carsten Haubold; Nathalie Harder; Pavel Matula; Petr Matula; David Svoboda; Miroslav Radojevic; Ihor Smal; Karl Rohr; Joakim Jaldén; Helen M Blau; Oleh Dzyubachyk; Boudewijn Lelieveldt; Pengdong Xiao; Yuexiang Li; Siu-Yeung Cho; Alexandre C Dufour; Jean-Christophe Olivo-Marin; Constantino C Reyes-Aldasoro; Jose A Solis-Lemus; Robert Bensch; Thomas Brox; Johannes Stegmaier; Ralf Mikut; Steffen Wolf; Fred A Hamprecht; Tiago Esteves; Pedro Quelhas; Ömer Demirel; Lars Malmström; Florian Jug; Pavel Tomancak; Erik Meijering; Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia; Michal Kozubek; Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-10-30       Impact factor: 28.547

8.  Fast segmentation of stained nuclei in terabyte-scale, time resolved 3D microscopy image stacks.

Authors:  Johannes Stegmaier; Jens C Otte; Andrei Kobitski; Andreas Bartschat; Ariel Garcia; G Ulrich Nienhaus; Uwe Strähle; Ralf Mikut
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithms.

Authors:  Martin Maška; Vladimír Ulman; David Svoboda; Pavel Matula; Petr Matula; Cristina Ederra; Ainhoa Urbiola; Tomás España; Subramanian Venkatesan; Deepak M W Balak; Pavel Karas; Tereza Bolcková; Markéta Streitová; Craig Carthel; Stefano Coraluppi; Nathalie Harder; Karl Rohr; Klas E G Magnusson; Joakim Jaldén; Helen M Blau; Oleh Dzyubachyk; Pavel Křížek; Guy M Hagen; David Pastor-Escuredo; Daniel Jimenez-Carretero; Maria J Ledesma-Carbayo; Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia; Erik Meijering; Michal Kozubek; Carlos Ortiz-de-Solorzano
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  CellProfiler 3.0: Next-generation image processing for biology.

Authors:  Claire McQuin; Allen Goodman; Vasiliy Chernyshev; Lee Kamentsky; Beth A Cimini; Kyle W Karhohs; Minh Doan; Liya Ding; Susanne M Rafelski; Derek Thirstrup; Winfried Wiegraebe; Shantanu Singh; Tim Becker; Juan C Caicedo; Anne E Carpenter
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2018-07-03       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Deep learning -- promises for 3D nuclear imaging: a guide for biologists.

Authors:  Guillaume Mougeot; Tristan Dubos; Frédéric Chausse; Emilie Péry; Katja Graumann; Christophe Tatout; David E Evans; Sophie Desset
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2022-04-14       Impact factor: 5.235

2.  FLINO-A new method for immunofluorescence bioimage normalization.

Authors:  John Graf; Sanghee Cho; Elizabeth McDonough; Alex Corwin; Anup Sood; Andreas Lindner; Manuela Salvucci; Xanthi Stachtea; Sandra Van Schaeybroeck; Philip D Dunne; Pierre Laurent-Puig; Daniel Longley; Jochen H M Prehn; Fiona Ginty
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-10-02       Impact factor: 6.937

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.