| Literature DB >> 31114409 |
Xiaoyu Lan1,2, Wenchao Wang1.
Abstract
Background: Although abundant research documented the vulnerability of left-behind children in rural China, little is known about whether early left-behind experiences are linked to their positive psychosocial functioning in later life, as well as the potential protective factors for their psychosocial adjustment. Purpose: Informed by positive youth development framework and a positive adjustment framework in migrants, the current study compares psychosocial adjustment characterized by self-esteem and prosocial behavior between emerging adults with early left-behind experiences (LB-E) and their counterparts (Non-LB-E). Of importance, this study also examines the potential protective roles of social context (ie, peer support) and individual characteristic (ie, resilience) in psychosocial outcomes among Chinese emerging adults with and without early left-behind experiences.Entities:
Keywords: emerging adult; left-behind children; peer support; prosocial behavior; resilience; self-esteem
Year: 2019 PMID: 31114409 PMCID: PMC6489595 DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S202774
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Res Behav Manag ISSN: 1179-1578
Figure 1Hypothesized model. Age, gender, socioeconomic status (SES) and potentially traumatic life events (PTE) were considered as potential covariates. aCoded as 1= emerging adults with early left-behind experiences, 0= emerging adults without early left-behind experiences. + refers to positive association and - refers to negative association.
Descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations of study variables between LB-E and non-LB-E
| LB-E (n=182) | Non-LB-E (n=182) | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Range | Mean | SD | Range | |||||||||
| 1. Peer support | 5.14 | 1.25 | 1–7 | 5.30 | 1.19 | 1–7 | − | 0.58*** | 0.44*** | 0.61*** | 0.10 | 0.12 | 0.09 | −0.13 |
| 2. Resilience | 2.37 | 0.77 | 0–4 | 2.41 | 0.79 | 0–4 | 0.52*** | − | 0.63*** | 0.72*** | 0.08 | 0.20** | 0.09 | −0.13 |
| 3. Self-esteem | 2.92 | 0.43 | 1–4 | 2.95 | 0.46 | 1–4 | 0.49*** | 0.68*** | − | 0.52*** | 0.07 | 0.17** | 0.12 | −0.08 |
| 4. PB | 5.04 | 1.07 | 1–7 | 5.04 | 1.16 | 1–7 | 0.47*** | 0.63*** | 0.52*** | − | 0.12 | 0.09 | 0.10 | −0.05 |
| 5. Age | 19.37 | 0.99 | 18–22 | 19.20 | 0.87 | 18–22 | −0.11 | −0.01 | −0.09 | 0.07 | − | 0.20** | 0.01 | −0.02 |
| 6. Gender | − | − | 1–2 | − | − | 1–2 | 0.12 | 0.05 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.00 | − | −0.14 | −0.17* |
| 7. SES | 3.81 | 1.41 | 2–8 | 4.16 | 1.39 | 2–8 | 0.01 | −0.08 | −0.01 | −0.04 | −0.18* | 0.07 | − | −0.07 |
| 8. PTE | 0.60 | 0.74 | 0–5 | 0.62 | 0.79 | 0–5 | 0.08 | 0.01 | −0.14 | 0.02 | 0.17* | −0.05 | −0.09 | − |
Notes: Correlation coefficients displayed above the diagonal are for the non-LB-E group, below for the LB-E group. *p< 0.05 **p< 0.01 ***p< 0.001.
Abbreviations: LB-E, emerging adults with early left-behind experiences; non-LB-E, emerging adults without early left-behind experiences; PB, prosocial behavior; SES, socioeconomic status; PTE, potentially traumatic life events.
Figure 2Structural path diagram of the final model. aCoded as 1= emerging adults with early left-behind experiences, 0= emerging adults without early left-behind experiences. Only significant paths are shown with p<0.05.
Figure 3Interactive effect of peer support and resilience on self-esteem. Resilience was divided into two levels based on mean: low = mean – 1 SD, high = mean +1 SD. Light blue bands represent 95% confidence intervals.
Figure 4Interactive effect of peer support and group membership on prosocial behavior.
Abbreviations: LB-E, emerging adults with early left-behind experiences; Non-LB-E, emerging adults without early left-behind experiences.