| Literature DB >> 31114405 |
Tian Qiu1, Chunli Liu1, Hao Huang1, Shihan Yang1, Zhihui Gu1, Fangqiong Tian1, Hui Wu1.
Abstract
Background: Workplace violence (WPV) and psychological capital (PsyCap) are linked to professional identity, however, little research has examined how WPV is associated with professional identity via PsyCap. This study is aimed to examine the association between WPV and professional identity, and to further explore whether PsyCap can serve as a mediator between WPV and professional identity among Chinese doctors. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted from November to December in Liaoning Province in China, in 2017. The study used a questionnaire consisting of Workplace Violence Scale (WVS), Occupational Identity Scale (OIS), Psychological Capital Questionnaire (PCQ), as well as questions about demographic characteristics. Out of 1200 doctors, 995 (effective response rate of 82.92%) completed the questionnaire survey and became our final subjects. Hierarchical multiple regression and the asymptotic and resampling strategies were conducted to explore the mediating role of PsyCap in the relationship between WPV and professional identity.Entities:
Keywords: Chinese doctors; professional identity; psychological capital; workplace violence
Year: 2019 PMID: 31114405 PMCID: PMC6474643 DOI: 10.2147/PRBM.S198443
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Psychol Res Behav Manag ISSN: 1179-1578
Figure 1Theoretical model of the mediating role of PsyCap on the association between WPV and professional identity. c: association of WPV with professional identity; a: association of WPV with PsyCap; b: association between PsyCap and professional identity after controlling for the covariates; c’: association of WPV with professional identity after adding PsyCap as a mediator.
Abbreviations: WPV, workplace violence; PsyCap, psychological capital.
Mean scores of professional identity according to demographic characteristics of participants (n=995)
| Variables | n (%) | mean ± SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 8.29 | <0.01 | ||
| ≤30 | 265 (26.63) | 27.35±9.61 | ||
| 31–39 | 291 (29.25) | 29.84±8.04 | ||
| ≥40 | 439 (44.12) | 29.91±8.44 | ||
| Gender | 2.21 | 0.14 | ||
| Male | 542 (54.47) | 28.83±8.86 | ||
| Female | 453 (45.53) | 29.66±8.54 | ||
| Educational situation | 12.05 | <0.01 | ||
| Undergraduate and below | 726 (72.96) | 28.63±8.60 | ||
| Master and above | 269 (27.04) | 30.78±8.85 | ||
| Marital status | 20.36 | <0.01 | ||
| Single/divorced/widow/separated | 351 (35.28) | 27.54±10.14 | ||
| Married/cohabitation | 644 (64.72) | 30.12±7.70 |
Correlations among WPV, PsyCap and professional identity
| Mean | SD | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Age | 37.37 | 9.79 | 1 | |||||||
| 2. WPV | 5.23 | 4.07 | 0.10** | 1 | ||||||
| 3. Self-efficacy | 22.26 | 6.65 | −0.08* | −0.29** | 1 | |||||
| 4. Hope | 22.36 | 6.34 | −0.06 | −0.22** | 0.84** | 1 | ||||
| 5. Resilience | 22.07 | 4.92 | −0.01 | −0.33** | 0.76** | 0.79** | 1 | |||
| 6. Optimism | 22.00 | 3.20 | −0.03 | −0.36** | 0.70** | 0.67** | 0.77** | 1 | ||
| 7. PsyCap | 88.69 | 19.22 | −0.06 | −0.32** | 0.93** | 0.93** | 0.91** | 0.824** | 1 | |
| 8. Professional identity | 29.21 | 8.72 | 0.11** | −0.37** | 0.50* | 0.49** | 0.50** | 0.46** | 0.54** | 1 |
Notes: *P<0.05; **P<0.01(two-tailed).
Abbreviations: WPV, workplace violence; PsyCap, psychological capital.
Hierarchical multiple regression results for professional identity
| Variables | Professional identity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block 1 ( | Block 2( | Block 3 ( | ||
| Model 1 | Model 2 | |||
| Block 1 | ||||
| Age | 0.08* | 0.13** | 0.16** | 0.15** |
| Gender | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Marital status | 0.11** | 0.08* | 0.04 | 0.03 |
| Educational situation | 0.11** | 0.07* | 0.01 | 0.01 |
| Block 2 | ||||
| WPV | −0.37** | −0.24** | −0.24** | |
| Block 3 | ||||
| Self-efficacy | 0.15** | |||
| Hope | 0.21** | |||
| Resilience | 0.08 | |||
| Optimism | 0.07 | |||
| PsyCap | 0.47** | |||
| 10.27** | 41.02** | 62.67** | 93.84** | |
| Adjusted | 0.04 | 0.17 | 0.36 | 0.36 |
| △ | 0.04 | 0.13 | 0.19 | 0.19 |
Notes: Educational situation: undergraduate or lower; master or higher
Marital status: single/divorced/widow/separated; married/cohabitation.
*P<0.05; **P<0.01 (two-tailed).
Abbreviations: WPV, workplace violence; PsyCap, psychological capital.
WPV as the independent variable and PsyCap and its components as mediators in the regression analysis
| Mediators | Path coefficients | a*b (BCa 95% CI) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| c | a | b | c’ | ||
| Self-efficacy | −0.37** | −0.26** | 0.15** | −0.24** | −0.04 (−0.08, −0.01) |
| Hope | −0.37** | −0.19** | 0.21** | −0.24** | −0.04 (−0.08, −0.01) |
| Resilience | −0.37** | −0.31** | 0.08 | −0.24** | −0.02 (−0.08, 0.02) |
| Optimism | −0.37** | −0.34** | 0.07 | −0.24** | −0.02 (−0.06, 0.02) |
| PsyCap | −0.37** | −0.29** | 0.47** | −0.24** | −0.13 (−0.18, −0.10) |
Notes: c: the association of WPV with professional identity; a: the association of WPV with PsyCap; b: the association of PsyCap with professional identity after controlling for the covariates; c’: the association of WPV with professional identity after adding PsyCap as a mediator; a*b: the product of a and b; BCa 95% CI: the bias-corrected and accelerated 95% confidence interval.
Age, gender, marital status and educational situation were covariates.
Abbreviations: WPV, workplace violence; PsyCap, psychological capital. **P<0.01(two-tailed).