VKORC1 variants as significant predictors of warfarin dose in Emiratis.

Purpose: Variability in response to warfarin is one of the main obstacles challenging its use in clinical practice. Vitamin K epoxide reductase complex (VKORC) is the target enzyme of warfarin, and variations in the form of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in VKORC1, coding for this enzyme, are known to cause resistance to warfarin treatment. This study aimed to explore VKORC1 variants in Emirati patients receiving warfarin treatment and to correlate their genotypes at the studied SNPs to their maintenance warfarin dose. Patients and methods: Sanger sequencing of the majority of the VKORC1 gene was applied to samples from 90 patients and 117 normal individuals recruited from Tawam Hospital, Al-Ain, UAE. Genotypes at the following variants were determined (rs9923231, rs188009042, rs61742245, rs17708472, rs9934438, rs8050894, rs2359612, rs7294). Statistical analysis was applied, including ANOVA, cross-tabulation, and multiple linear regression analysis, to determine the ability of nongenetic factors (age and gender) and genetic factors (VKORC1 genotypes) to explain variability in warfarin dose in patients.
Results: Different frequencies of minor alleles were detected in the selected SNPs. Significant variation among genotypes at six VKORC1 variants were identified (rs9923231, rs9934438, rs8050894, rs2359612, rs7294). The main predictors for warfarin dose were rs9923231, age, and rs61742245 with 50.7% of the average warfarin dose in our sample could be explained by a regression model built on these three factors.
Conclusion: This is the first report of the explanatory power of VKORC1 genotypes and nongenetic factors (age and gender) on warfarin dose among Emiratis. Also, this study highlighted the positive effect of considering rare pharmacogenomic variants on explaining warfarin dose variability.

Introduction

For >50 years, warfarin continued to be the mainstay anticoagulant worldwide.1 It is commonly prescribed in the management and prophylaxis of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation, cardiac valve prosthesis, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, and recurrent stroke among other indications.1 Although it proved to be highly effective in reducing thrombosis related morbidity and mortality, warfarin has a narrow therapeutic window and therefore maintaining the required anticoagulant effect is often challenging. Warfarin dose is usually titrated through monitoring its blood thinning effect defined by the international normalized ratio (INR).2,3 Sequelae of overdosing include bleeding and hospitalization which are among the most common adverse events in USA,4 and under-dosing puts patients at high risk of thrombotic events.2 New classes of anticoagulants were developed, and they are gradually replacing warfarin in many indications due to their superior safety profile.5 However, warfarin is still one of the 50 most commonly prescribed medications. It continues to be the most prescribed anti-coagulant worldwide especially in developing countries.1,3,6

The difficulty in reaching target INR with standard warfarin doses lies in the wide range of variability exhibited in individuals’ response. Warfarin is crucially affected by drug–drug interactions, alcohol consumption, and some food supplements.7 Vitamin K intake was found, in several studies, to correlate with dose. Moreover, several physical factors, such as age and weight have shown to affect warfarin dose requirement.8,9 The first clues of a genetic factor in this variability appeared in the 1990s.8 At present, genetic differences can explain around 50% of the interindividual variability in warfarin treatment.10

Initially, pharmacogenomics studies of warfarin traced its metabolic pathway looking for candidate genes that might be involved in interindividual variability. This candidate gene approach identified the metabolizing enzyme cytochrome P450 2C9 encoded by the CYP2C9 gene as a significant contributor. It was soon found that individuals with nonfunctional haplotypes that produce a metabolically impaired enzyme require lower doses of warfarin. More genes in the metabolic pathway were investigated with results of little significance. Despite strong indications on the presence of other genetic determinants, there were no significant advances in identifying them until 2004 when the molecular target of the drug, Vitamin K epoxide reductase, was identified.8,11

Vitamin K epoxide reductase complex subunit 1 protein is the target enzyme of warfarin and is encoded by the VKORC1 gene. Warfarin inhibits this reductase, limiting the conversion of vitamin K epoxide into vitamin K and consequently decreasing the formation of clotting factors.12,13 Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) occurring on VKORC1 mainly including rs9923231, rs17708472, rs9934438, and rs2359612 were found to affect the availability or activity of the reductase impacting the anticoagulant effect of drugs targeting this enzyme, like warfarin.14 Some of the variants were found to cause partial or complete resistance to warfarin without reaching the target INR.15 In general, VKORC1 variants can explain approximately 20–30% of the variation in warfarin dosing.16 Consequently, haplotype maps were established from the common VKORC1 SNPs. These efforts yielded two main ways to report VKORC1 haplotypes: the H system17 and the star system.18 Both systems were built in European populations. The H haplotypes (from H1 to H9) depend on the genotypes at 10 variants (rs7196161, rs17880887, rs17881535, rs9923231, rs2884737, rs17708472, rs9934438, rs8050894, rs2359612, rs7294). These haplotypes can be further grouped into two main groups: group A that includes H1 and H2 which are low-dose haplotypes, and group B that includes H7, H8, H9 which are high-dose haplotypes.17 The star system relies on the genotypes at five variants (rs9923231, rs17708472, rs9934438, rs2359612, rs7294). In the star system, *2 haplotype is associated with low-dose warfarin while *3 and *4 alleles are associated with a high dose of warfarin.18

Numerous studies have established the contribution of VKORC1 genomic variants on warfarin dose in patients from different populations. Some SNPs were found to be common in diverse populations, while others were found sporadically and were considered rare.11 The United Arab Emirates (UAE) indigenous citizens are considered an admixed population that is under-represented in pharmacogenomics studies. The current study aimed at evaluating the effect of the eight variants in VKORC1 on warfarin maintenance dose in a group of Emirati patients receiving a stabilized dose of warfarin. The chosen variants included those in the star system (five SNPs) and three more SNPs that were found to be actionable in some populations.19 Furthermore, we aimed at estimating the frequencies of haplotypes and analyzing their association with warfarin dose.

Methods

Sample

The study cohort included 90 unrelated patients treated with warfarin and 107 normal controls. All the participants were Emiratis who were recruited from Tawam Hospital, Al-Ain, UAE. Participants had read the information sheet and signed informed consent forms. This study was conducted according to the declaration of Helsinki after the approval of Al-Ain Medical District Human Research Ethics Committee (Ethical Approval CRD 261-Protocol No. 13/38).

Patients data were collected retrospectively and included warfarin stabilized dose, target INR, indication for warfarin therapy, comorbidities, other prescribed medications, and demographic characteristics. About 5 mL of peripheral venous blood was collected and placed in an EDTA tube to be genotyped.

Genotyping

DNA was extracted from peripheral leukocytes using a whole-blood extraction kit (Flexigene DNA isolation kit; Qiagen, Germany). The isolated genomic DNA samples were kept in sterile plastic vials at 4°C until analysis or stored at −20°C. Genotype study was carried out using the PCR. The forward and reverse primers sequences for amplifying most of the VKORC1 gene and its promoter, and the PCR conditions are listed in Table 1.

Table 1

Primers and PCR conditions used to amplify and sequence the vast majority of genomic sequence including the reported SNPs on VKORC1

Forward primer	Reverse primer	Annealing temp(°C)	Annealing time (min)	Product size (bp)
F1-GCCAGCAGGAGAGGGAAATA	R1-AGTTTGGACTACAGGTGCCT	58	60	290
F2-GCAGGCACCTGTAGTCCAA	R2-CGCTTACCCTATGCCAAGTC	58	60	842
F3-TGATCCGCTGGTCTCTAGGT	R3-GAGAGCACTAAGCCCGTCAG	58	60	786
F5-GTCTGGCTGTGCGTGATG	R5-GCCATAGCGCCCGATTAATT	58	45	313
F6-AGGCGTTAGCATAATGACGG	R6-GGGTGGAACCAGGTTAGGAC	60	60	725
F7-GTCCTAACCTGGTTCCACCC	R7-CCCTCCAAGGGACTGGTCT	60	60	995
F9-GAATACGTGCGTAAGCCACC	R9-GGTTCAGACTTGGCTGATTG	60	45	659

The quality of PCR amplification was checked by separation on 0.6% agarose gel electrophoresis before proceeding to Sanger sequencing. For sequencing, the PCR products were purified using ExoSAP-IT® (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Cycle sequencing was performed using the BigDye Terminator kit v3.1 (Applied Biosystems) under standard conditions. Capillary electrophoresis was performed in a 3130xl Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems).

Statistical analysis

Frequencies, means, and standard deviations, when applicable, were calculated. The frequencies of each allele were calculated from the genotypes of patients and controls. The retrieved genotypes and allele frequencies for each variant were compared between the patients and control groups by chi-square (χ2) and Fisher’s exact test. The same tests were used to compare the frequencies in all participants with frequencies from the global population of the 1000 Genomes Project. The minor alleles at each studied SNP were determined depending on Ensembl database19 and PharmGKB database. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium was tested by χ2 test. Pairwise linkage disequilibrium (LD) between the selected SNPs was assessed by calculating D’ and r2.

ANOVA was used to assess the effect of individual VKORC1 polymorphisms on the maintenance dose of warfarin. Patients were assigned into three groups according to warfarin dose: group 1 included patients who used doses ≤3 mg/day (ie, denoted as the low-dose group). Group 2 included patients with doses between 3.1 and 5.9 mg/day (ie, intermediate-dose group), and group 3 includes patients who used doses ≥6 mg/day (ie, high-dose group). Cross-tabulation with χ2 statistics were performed to describe the relationship between genotypes and dose-dependent groups. Haplotypes were constructed based on selected SNPs using the SNPSstats21 and SNPAlyze ver 9.022 software.

Multivariant analysis using linear regression was used to determine the ability of nongenetic factors (ie, age and gender) and genetic factors (VKORC1 genotypes) to predict warfarin dose. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (version 24; SPSS Inc, an IBM Company, Chicago, IL, USA). The significance level of two-sided P-value was chosen to be ≤0.05.

Results

Patients characteristics

Warfarin stabilized dose was defined as the dose that was prescribed and maintained for the last three clinic visits at least to achieve the target INR. In the patients group (n=90) warfarin dose ranged from 0.5 to 15 mg (mean 4.7±2.48) for a target INR of 2–3 for these patients. Descriptive statistics of the patients are summarized in Table 2. Briefly, 45 males and 45 females were included in this study with an average age of 60.54±17.8 years. Atrial fibrillation was the most common indication for warfarin treatment in this study.

Table 2

Descriptive statistics for 90 Emirati individuals treated with warfarin recruited for VKORC1 genotyping

Variable	Value
Gender, n (%)FemaleMale	45 (50)45 (50)
Age in years, rangeMean age (SD)	21–9860.54 (17.8)
Indication for warfarin therapy, n Atrial fibrillationProsthetic heart valveDeep vein thrombosisCardiomyopathyHypercoagulable stateStrokePulmonary embolismLeft ventricular thrombosisValve disease	382616322111

VKORC1 SNPs genotyping

Genotypes at the studied SNPs were analyzed in both patients and controls. For LD analysis, only variants that had allele frequencies >0.1 were evaluated. It was found that SNPs rs9923231 and rs9934438 are in complete LD (pairwise r2=1). Figure 1 illustrates the pairwise LD statistics of selected markers.

Figure 1

Linkage disequilibrium analysis: a diagram of VKORC1 with the location of selected SNPs (Transcript: VKORC1-205 ENST00000394975.2). Black and blue boxes represent exons (E) and untranslated regions (UTR), respectively. Dark red blocks represent stronger LD than the lighter ones. Values represent pairwise r2.

The allele frequencies at each variant were calculated and compared between patients and controls, and no statistically significant (P<0.05) differences between these frequencies was detected. Further on, the allele counts in the whole sample (patients and controls) were compared to the counts retrieved from the global population of the 1000 Genomes Project and statistically significant differences were found at all SNPs except rs17708472 (Table 3).

Table 3

Frequencies of minor alleles at the studied SNPs in comparison to allele frequencies in different populations from the 1000 Genomes Projecta

Variant	Minor allele	MAF in current study	MAF in ALL	P-valueb	AFR	AMR	EAS	EUR	SAS
rs9923231	A	0.52	0.356	<0.001	0.054	0.411	0.885	0.388	0.145
rs61742245	T	0.033	˂0.01	<0.001	0.001	–	–	0.001
rs188009042	G	0.01	0.003	a	–		0.014	–	–
rs17708472	T	0.083	0.094	0.79	0.033	0.140	0.003	0.234	0.092
rs9934438	T	0.52	0.356	<0.001	0.054	0.412	0.885	0.388	0.145
rs8050894	C	0.52	0.416	0.008	0.256	0.442	0.885	0.400	0.148
rs2359612	T	0.53	0.610	0.0003	0.821	0.575	0.115	0.612	0.855
rs7294	A	0.328	0.420	0.013	0.454	0.402	0.112	0.366	0.759

Notes: aFrequencies in different populations are adapted from www.ensembl.org; bP-values calculated between the current allele frequencies and allele frequency of global populations (1000 Genomes Project) using Fisher’s exact test.

Abbreviations: MAF, minor allele frequency; ALL, all individuals from phase 3 of 1000 Genomes Project; AFR, African; AMR, American; EAS, East Asian; EUR, European; SAS, South Asian.

SNPs variants association with dose requirement

A significant difference (P<0.05) in average doses of warfarin among different genotype groups was found at the following SNPs: rs9923231, rs9934438, rs8050894, rs2359612, and rs7294. A difference was also observed between genotype groups at rs61742245, but at lower significance. In contrast, no significant difference between genotype groups at the two variants (rs188009042, rs17708472) was detected (Table 4). Cross-tabulation showed that all the patients who were minor allele carriers at rs9923231, rs9934438, rs8050894, and rs2359612 required warfarin doses lower than 6 mg/day, ie, were in the low or intermediate dose group. Moreover, around 70% of those patients were found in the warfarin low-dose group (≤3 mg/day). In contrast, patients that carry the wild-type at the same variants clustered in the high-dose group (≥6 mg/day) and only a few of them were in the intermediate or low-dose groups. A similar significant association was reported at rs7294 but it was inverted; ie, minor allele carriers clustered in the high-dose group and most of the wild-type carriers were in the low-dose group (results of cross-tabulations are found in the supplementary material; Table S1).

Table 4

Frequencies of genotypes at the studied SNPs and results of ANOVA

VKORC1 SNP	Genotypes frequencies, n (%)	Average dose±SD	ANOVA
F (2,87)	P-value
rs9923231			32.955	0.00*
GG	22 (24.4%)	7.05±2.89
GA	43 (47.8%)	4.73±1.63
AA	25 (27.8%)	2.56±1.00
rs61742245
GG	86 (95.6%)	4.53±2.22	5.3.5	0.007*
GT	2 (2.2%)	7.50±2.12
TT	2 (2.2%)	9.25±8.13
rs188009042
AA	89 (98.9%)	4.66±2.47	1.80	0.18
AG	1 (1.0%)	8.00
GG	0	–
rs17708472
CC	76 (84.4%)	4.56±2.44	1.37	0.258
CT	13 (14.4%)	5.27±2.60
TT	1 (1.1%)	8.00
rs9934438			32.955	0.00*
CC	22 (24.4%)	7.05±2.89
CT	43 (47.8%)	4.73±1.63
TT	25 (27.8%)	2.56±1.00
rs8050894			29.541	0.00*
GG	21 (26.7%)	7.03±2.94
GC	45 (50.0%)	4.73±1.71
CC	24 (23.3%)	2.58±1.01
rs2359612			28.37	0.00*
CC	19 (21.1%)	7.09±3.04
CT	47 (52.2%)	4.81±1.76
TT	24 (26.7%)	2.58±1.01
rs7294			9.23	0.00*
GG	39 (43.3%)	3.60±2.48
GA	43 (47.8%)	5.32±1.99
AA	8 (8.9%)	6.71±2.63

Note: *Statistically significant.

Haplotype analysis and association with warfarin doses

Analyzing haplotypes in the patient’s group depending on the star system revealed that VKORC1*2 haplotype was the most frequent one with a 50% frequency. The second most frequent haplotype was VKORC1*3 with 32% frequency, followed by VKORC1*4 with 7% frequency, followed by the reference sequence VKORC1*1 with 6% frequency, and the remaining 5% were rare haplotypes. However, a global test for statistical difference among these haplotypes did not give a significant association with dose in linear regression analysis (P=0.62). Accordingly, we reconstructed haplotypes depending on all genotyped variants excluding the two variants, rs188009042 and rs17708472, that did not show significant variation within genotype or significant linkage to other variants in our sample. Haplotypes extracted from the six remaining variants (rs9923231, rs61742245, rs9934438, rs8050894, rs2359612, rs7294) have shown significant global haplotype association with dose (P=0.009). The most frequent haplotype (AGTCTG) was denoted by H1 and it had 50% frequency, followed by haplotype H2 (GGCGCA) with 32% frequency, followed by H3 (GGCGCG) with 11% frequency, then haplotype H4 (GTCGCG) with 2% frequency. The rare haplotypes which occurred in ≤2 individuals were combined in one group denoted as “rare”. Logistic regression was used to determine the association between haplotypes and warfarin dose. Table 5 lists the retrieved haplotypes, their frequencies, and association with dose.

Table 5

Analysis of haplotypes and their association with dose

Haplotype	rs9923231	rs61742245	rs9934438	rs8050894	rs2359612	rs7294	F (%)	Difference in mean(CI)*	P
H1	A	G	T	C	T	G	50	0.00	–
H2	G	G	C	G	C	A	32	2.29(1.6–2.95)	<0.0001**
H3	G	G	C	G	C	G	11	1.87(0.93–2.81)	0.00015**
H4	G	T	C	G	C	G	2	3.18(1.9–4.46)	<0.0001**
H5	G	G	C	G	T	G	1.2	1.02(−1.61–3.65)	0.45
Rare	*	*	*	*	*	*	2.8	2.36(0.62–4.1)	0.0089**

Notes: *The most frequent haplotype is considered the reference and the difference in means measures the difference between the mean of dose among each haplotype and the reference. **Significant association.

Multilinear regression analysis

A stepwise multivariate regression that included all the selected variants at VKORC1 with age and gender revealed that the main predictors for warfarin dose were rs9923231, age, and rs61742245. The most potent indicator was rs9923231, which alone explained 0.424 of dose variability (indicated by adjusted r2). Adding age increased the prediction of the model to 0.482, then by adding rs61742245 r2 it reached 0.507, which suggests that 50.7% of the average warfarin dose in our sample could be explained by genotype at rs9923231 and rs61742245 and age (P<0.05). Table 6 lists predictors and logistic regression for this model.

Table 6

Model summary and predictors of logistic regression

Model	R	R square	Adjusted R square	Std error of the estimate
1	0.656a	0.431	0.424	1.88
2	0.702b	0.493	0.482	1.79
3	0.724c	0.524	0.507	1.74

Notes: aPredictors (constant), rs9923231. bPredictors (constant), rs9923231, Age. cPredictors (constant), rs9923231. Age, rs61742245.

Abbreviation: Std, standard.

Discussion

The aim of the current study is to examine the effect of genotypes at some actionable variants of VKORC1 on warfarin dose. The main finding is the significant prediction power of some of these variants and age on warfarin dose in the Emirati population.

UAE is situated along the coast of the Arabian Gulf in a central area to the old-world that made it a vital nexus in the dispersal of modern human and historical migration waves.23 Indigenous UAE citizens, ie, Emiratis, who constitute <15% of the whole population (one out of nine million, UAE government census), include subgroups from different origins that demonstrate genetic isolates and semi-isolates that preferably practice consanguineous marriages.24 Bertrand et al found that Emiratis share 23.7% of their DNA with Southwest Asian population and, compared to other populations from Arabian Peninsula, they exhibit the highest contribution from Asia and the lowest from North Africa.23 In our data, statistically significant differences (P<0.05) were found between allele frequencies at the studied SNPs among 207 Emiratis (patients and controls) and frequencies reported in the 1000 Genomes Project. This finding is not surprising in an admixed population, that is composed of a rarely studied complex substructure. Genomic research that takes the population substructure into account would give deeper insights into the genomic similarities and differences with other populations.25

ANOVA in warfarin dosage between different genotypes revealed a significant difference at five variants. Mainly, rs9923231 was a leading contributor that remained a significant predictor of dose in our multiple regression generated model. The association between genotypes at this SNP and warfarin dose have repeatedly been reported in several populations and among different ethnicities.26 Moreover, rs9923231 was found to be a main determinant of warfarin dose among a Saudi Arabian population27 where it was reported in a frequency that was not statistically different from the current study (X2=3.4, P=0.6). This variant, which is commonly called in literature as −1639G>A, is known to occur in the promotor of VKORC1 affecting the transcription factor binding site and reducing the gene mRNA expression.17,28 The result of such reduction in activity was found to reduce vitamin K carboxylation rate and hence, warfarin requirement.18 Accordingly, clustering of >70% of minor alleles carriers at this SNP in the warfarin low-dose group (warfarin dose ≤3 mg/day) is justified. The opposite is true for wild-type carriers and both observations are consistent with previous reports.18,29

The intronic variant rs9934438 has repeatedly been found in near perfect concordance with rs9923231 (ie, perfect LD).17,26,30 A similar finding was reported in our population (LD pairwise r2=1). Accordingly, an identical clustering of genotypes in patients-dose groups has been seen in both variants. Moreover, the minor allele homozygous carriers of both SNPs (GG at rs9923231 and CC at rs9934438) required the highest doses of warfarin (7.05±2.89) compared to other genotype groups at the same variants. Variation in any of the two SNPs explained 18% and 5% of dose variability in Caucasians and African Americans, respectively.31 In our group, around 42.4% of warfarin dose variability could be explained by either of these two variants. This prediction power is also more than Chinese (31%),32 Iranian (20.3%),33 and close to Omani (45%) patients.34

Furthermore, the genotypes at the two SNPs, rs8050894 and rs2359612, were associated with a similar dose variance. These two SNPs, which are in intron 2, were associated with warfarin requirement in several populations.17,18 The mechanism underlying their effect is presumed to be through affecting transcription factor binding sites.17 In our population, none of the homozygote carriers of the minor alleles at these two variants required a high dose of warfarin and around 70% were in the warfarin low-dose group.

The fifth significant genotype was seen at rs7294. This variant is located in the 3ʹ untranslated region of VKORC1.18 The A allele was associated with significantly higher doses of warfarin in previous studies,31,35 as well as in our group. More recently, rs7294 was found to have a significant effect on warfarin plasma concentration.36 In our patients, ANOVA and cross-tabulation have shown significant differences between average dosages among genotype groups and significant association between minor allele carriers and high-dose group, respectively, at this SNP. However, it was not a significant predictor in our dose prediction model like what was found in European populations,29,31,37 and in contrast to results from Sudanese patients.38

The G>T at rs61742245 leads to a substitution of tyrosine for aspartic acid at amino acid 36 (p.D36Y). It was found to be associated with the requirement of high doses of warfarin in sporadic reports.18 It is mainly identified among Ashkenazi Jews and Ethiopians with minor allele frequency (MAF) around 4% and 15%, respectively.39,40 Kurnik et al focused on the magnitude of the effect of this variant on warfarin dose and found that after accounting of genetic and nongenetic covariates, the carriers of a single (D36Y) allele require more than double the dose of warfarin in comparison to non-carriers.41 In our cohort, four individuals had the minor allele (T) at rs61742245, of which two were homozygous. Remarkably, one of the homozygous carriers of the deficient allele was stabilized on an intermediate dose of warfarin (3.5 mg) while the other homozygous and the two heterozygous cases required high doses of warfarin (15, 6, and 9 mg/day, respectively). The latter three individuals’ requirement of high warfarin dose is consistent with findings from other populations,40 while the lower than expected dosage of the first homozygous patient suggests a possible presence of another factor affecting warfarin dose that was not included in our study (CYP2C9 status for instance). Regardless of the few individuals present in each genotype group, rs61742245 was a significant predictor in the regression model. Our study is the first to examine this variant in Arabs. Moreover, due to its low MAF, few studies have ever evaluated its effect on warfarin dose in other populations.

It is noteworthy, that five SNPs showed strong LD (rs9923231, rs9934438, rs8050894, rs235961, rs7294) (Figure 1), which was strongest at the first four (r2≥0.93) and moderate at rs7294 (r2≈0.7). Similar findings were reported from some other populations.17,26 LD describes the nonrandom association of alleles at two or more loci, and statistical analysis of LD can be used to extract haplotype blocks.42 When SNPs are in a strong LD, alleles of some of these variants can be predicted from other alleles. Hence, testing all the alleles will give redundant information.43 Accordingly, in our population rs9923231 and perhaps rs7294 can be chosen from the five previous SNPs, besides the significant variant at rs61742245, in case a limited number of VKORC1 SNPs are to be assessed.

The two remaining SNPs (rs188009042, rs17708472) exhibited low genotype variability in our sample, which has affected assessing their association with dose. The highest population frequency of the minor allele of (rs188009042) approaches 0.03 that was reported mainly in Asian populations19 and is less than its rate in our group. Though, due to the small sample size, the frequency in the Emirati population cannot be extrapolated. A similar observation applies to rs17708472. It is noteworthy that only one patient who represented an outlier with warfarin dose equal to 8 mg/day, carried one minor allele at rs188009042 and was homozygous for the alternative allele at rs17708472. The same individual carried the wild-type alleles on all other VKORC1 SNPs. The effect of these two variants on dose requirement could not be confirmed in this case, though it is not excluded.

Haplotype analysis based on star system did not give a significant association with dose. In contrast, haplotypes relying on the six variants that have shown significant outcomes in our primary variance analysis gave a significant association with dose. A better haplotype/dose model would be constructed if more variants were included and variants from other genes were tested.

Regarding the nongenetic factors, gender and age were examined. While the gender did not show any effect on dose, age was the second most reliable dose predicting variable. It is already established that patients of older age have to be treated with more conservative regimens of warfarin. The higher risk of bleeding, comorbidities, and concomitant used medications all are among the leading reasons for starting with lower doses in geriatric patients.44

Our study has some limitations; a limited number of nongenetic factors was included in our analysis while body mass index and smoking status might be other significant contributors. Moreover, we did not genotype other genes known to affect warfarin dosing (eg, CYP2C9) for the same studied individuals, which would have explained the outlier group and added to the prediction power of our model.

Conclusions

This is the first report of the explanatory power of VKORC1 genotypes and nongenetic factors (age and gender) on warfarin dose in Emiratis. The common variant rs9923231 along with the rare variant at rs61742245 and age attributed to >50% of the variability in warfarin dose. Although VKORC1 genotype and age are well-known predictors of warfarin dose in different populations, a model based on these factors was remarkably a strong predictor of warfarin dose in our population. We highlighted here that under-represented populations exhibit different allele frequencies, haplotype structures, and might have some rare actionable pharmacogenomic variants.

Table S1

Results of cross-tabulation

	Low dose	Intermediate dose	High dose
GG	2	4	16
GA	6	30	7
AA	20	5	0
Total	28	39	23
GG	2	4	15
GC	7	30	8
CC	19	5	0
Total	28	39	23
CC	2	4	16
CT	6	30	7
TT	20	5	0
Total	28	39	23
CC	2	3	14
CT	7	31	9
TT	19	5	0
Total	28	39	23
GG	22	11	6
GA	4	28	11
AA	2	0	6
Total	28	39	23
AA	28	39	22
AG	0	0	1
GG	0	0	0
Total	28	39	23
GG	28	38	20
GT	0	0	2
TT	0	1	1
Total	28	39	23
CC	26	33	17
CT	2	6	5
TT	0	0	1
Total	28	39	23