| Literature DB >> 31114151 |
Deepinder K Dhaliwal1, Siwei Zhou1, Sandeep S Samudre2, Nathan J Lo3, Michelle K Rhee4.
Abstract
Purpose: Dry eye disease (DED) is a common disorder that negatively impacts quality of life and vision. Prior studies have shown some benefit of acupuncture for dry eye, but very few have included control group to mitigate placebo effect. This study was designed with a sham acupuncture control group to evaluate true acupuncture treatment effect.Entities:
Keywords: acupuncture; dry eye; keratoconjunctivitis sicca; sham acupuncture
Year: 2019 PMID: 31114151 PMCID: PMC6497118 DOI: 10.2147/OPTH.S175321
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Ophthalmol ISSN: 1177-5467
Study criteria
| 1. 18 years of age or older |
| 2. Previous diagnosis of dry eye disease (DED) by an ophthalmologist |
| 3. Persistent signs and symptoms of DED for at least 1 month |
| 1. Intraocular surgery or laser within 90 days |
| 2. History of acupuncture treatment within the past year |
| 3. Known history of adverse reaction to acupuncture |
| 4. Pregnancy |
| 5. Breast feeding |
Figure 1Schematic diagram of the study design.
Demographic data and baseline values in true and sham acupuncture treatment groups
| Characteristic | True acupuncture | Sham |
|---|---|---|
| Acupuncture | ||
| Group (n=24) | Group (n=25) | |
| Age (average) | 54±13 | 60±14 |
| Age range | 24–83 | 24–83 |
| Females | 20 | 19 |
| Pre-menopausal | 4 | 3 |
| Post-menopausal | 16 | 16 |
| Males | 4 | 6 |
| Female/male ratio | 5:1 | 19:6 |
| Computer use (hours/day) | 4±3 | 4±4 |
Note: Wherever applicable, data are presented as mean ± SD.
Atmospheric conditions at evaluation points throughout the study
| Treatment | Baseline | 1 Month | 3 Month | 6 Month | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean temperature (°F) | T | 60±15 | 59±16 | 49±17 | 39±17 |
| S | 60±12 | 61±16 | 46±17 | 38±15 | |
| Dew point (°F) | T | 47±15 | 48±16 | 39±19 | 27±16 |
| S | 49±12 | 48±17 | 33±16 | 28±16 | |
| Relative humidity (%) | T | 64±13 | 68±18 | 71±22 | 65±20 |
| S | 67±13 | 64±13 | 63±315 | 70±21 |
Note: Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Abbreviations: T, true treatment; S, sham treatment.
Figure 2Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). OSDI was evaluated at baseline and after 1 week, 1, 3, and 6 months in patients receiving either true (n=24) or sham (n=25) acupuncture treatment. True acupuncture treatment significantly improved OSDI when compared to sham treatment only after 6 months (*p=0.04). Also, OSDI scores significantly improved 1 week after true acupuncture treatment and continued to improve (†p<0.05).
Secondary outcomes were evaluated at 1, 3 and 6 months
| Outcome measure | Treatment | Baseline | 1 Month | 3 Month | 6 Month | N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TBUT | T | 3±3 | 3±3 | 3±3 | 3±3 | 24 | <0.9/0.5/0.3 |
| S | 3±2 | 3±3 | 3±3 | 2±2 | 25 | ||
| Schirmer’s test | T | 10±8 | 9±6 | 10±7 | 11±9 | 24 | <0.3/0.4/0.3 |
| S | 9±7 | 11±7 | 8±4 | 10±6 | 25 | ||
| Ocular surface grading | T | 8±4 | 6±4 | 7±4 | 7±4 | 24 | <0.5/0.1/0.4 |
| S | 6±3 | 5±3 | 6±3 | 6±2 | 25 | ||
| Artificial tear application (questionnaire) | T | 3±3 | 3±3 | 3±3 | 2±2 | 24 | <0.5/0.3/0.3 |
| S | 4±3 | 3±3 | 3±2 | 3±3 | 25 | ||
| Frequency of eye closing (questionnaire) | T | 6±4 | 3±4 | 3±5 | 3±4 | 24 | <0.2/0.002/0.2 |
| S | 5±4 | 3±3 | 4±4 | 3±3 | 25 |
Notes: *Comparison of True vs Sham treatment groups. **Compared to baseline within the True treatment group. ***Compared to baseline within the Sham treatment group. Data are presented as mean ± SD.
Abbreviations: T, true treatment; S, sham treatment; TBUT, tear film break-up time.
General questionnaire DED symptoms score
| DED symptoms | Treatment | Baseline | 1 Month | 3 Month | 6 Month | N | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Discomfort | T | 2±1 | 1±1† | 1±1† | 1±1† | 24 | >0.9/0.01/0.02 |
| S | 2±1 | 2±1 | 1±1† | 1±1† | 25 | ||
| Dryness | T | 3±1 | 2±1† | 2±1† | 1±1† | 24 | >0.9/0.001/0.01 |
| S | 3±1 | 2±1† | 2±1† | 2±1† | 25 | ||
| Scratchiness | T | 2±1 | 1±1† | 1±1† | 1±1† | 24 | >0.9/0.001/0.3 |
| S | 2±1 | 1±1 | 1±1† | 1±1† | 25 | ||
| Burning | T | 1±1 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 24 | >0.6/0.1/0.1 |
| S | 2±2 | 1±2 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 25 | ||
| Stinging | T | 1±1 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 24 | >0.9/0.1/0.3 |
| S | 1±1 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 25 | ||
| Tiredness | T | 2±1 | 1±1 | 1±2 | 1±1† | 24 | >0.4/0.1/0.2 |
| S | 2±1 | 2±2 | 2±1 | 2±1 | 25 | ||
| Redness | T | 2±1 | 1±1† | 1±1 | 1±1† | 24 | >0.3/0.01/0.1 |
| S | 2±2 | 1±2 | 1±1 | 1±2 | 25 | ||
| Watering | T | 1±1 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 0±1 | 24 | >0.2/0.4/0.5 |
| S | 1±1 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 25 | ||
| Blurring | T | 1±1 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 24 | >0.4/0.1/0.1 |
| S | 2±2 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 25 | ||
| Decreased Vision | T | 1±1 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 24 | >0.5/0.6/0.2 |
| S | 1±2 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 1±1 | 25 |
Notes: *Comparison of True vs Sham treatment groups. **Compared to baseline within the True treatment group. ***Compared to baseline within the Sham treatment group. † Intragroup comparison to baseline. Responses were assigned numerical scores, 0=never, 1=rarely, 2=sometimes, 3=frequently and 4=constantly. The higher the score the worse the symptoms. A Kruskal–Wallis test was performed on ranks to achieve statistical differences, as these data do not follow normal distribution.
Abbreviations: T, true treatment; S, sham treatment; DED, dry eye disease.