Literature DB >> 31113806

An Artificial Antigen-Presenting Cell Delivering 11 Immune Molecules Expands Tumor Antigen-Specific CTLs in Ex Vivo and In Vivo Murine Melanoma Models.

Lei Zhang1, Shilong Song1, Xiaoxiao Jin1, Xin Wan1, Khawar Ali Shahzad1, Weiya Pei1, Chen Zhao1, Chuanlai Shen2.   

Abstract

Antigen-presenting cells expand antigen-specific T cells ex vivo and in vivo for tumor immunotherapy, but are time-consuming to generate and, as live cells, raise biosafety concerns. An alternative is found in cell-free artificial antigen-presenting cells (aAPC), but these only present two or three kinds of immune molecules. Here, we describe a multipotent artificial antigen-presenting cell (MaAPC) that delivered 11 kinds of immune moleclues. This MaAPC simulated natural APCs through the concurent coupling of target antigens (H-2Kb/TRP2180-188-Ig dimers and H-2Db/gp10025-33-Ig dimers), costimulatory molecules (anti-CD28, anti-4-1BB, and anti-CD2), and "self-marker" CD47-Fc onto surface-modified polylactic-co-glycolic acid microparticles (PLGA-MP). These PLGA-MPs also encapsulated cytokines (IL2 and IL15), a chemokine (CCL21), and checkpoint inhibitors (anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1). Culture of MaAPCs with naïve T cells for 1 week elevated the frequencies of TRP2180-188-specific and gp10025-33-specific CTLs to 51.0% and 43.3%, respectively, with enhanced cytotoxicity. Three infusions of MaAPCs inhibited subcutaneous melanoma growth in a mouse model and expanded TRP2180-188 and gp10025-33-specific CTLs 59-86-fold in peripheral blood, 76-77-fold in spleen, and 205-212-fold in tumor tissue, in an antigen-specific manner. Compared with conventional aAPCs carrying two or three immune molecules, the 11-signal MaAPCs exerted greater impact on T cells, including activation, proliferation, cytotoxicity, differentiation to memory CTLs or regulatory T cells and cytokines profiles, without detected side effects. Such MaAPCs could be used to individualize tumor immunotherapy. ©2019 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31113806     DOI: 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0881

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res        ISSN: 2326-6066            Impact factor:   11.151


  6 in total

Review 1.  Chemically Engineered Immune Cell-Derived Microrobots and Biomimetic Nanoparticles: Emerging Biodiagnostic and Therapeutic Tools.

Authors:  Leila Pourtalebi Jahromi; Mohammad-Ali Shahbazi; Aziz Maleki; Amir Azadi; Hélder A Santos
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 16.806

Review 2.  Biomaterials to enhance antigen-specific T cell expansion for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Ariel Isser; Natalie K Livingston; Jonathan P Schneck
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2020-12-05       Impact factor: 15.304

Review 3.  Nano-Enhanced Cancer Immunotherapy: Immunology Encounters Nanotechnology.

Authors:  Ernesto Bockamp; Sebastian Rosigkeit; Dominik Siegl; Detlef Schuppan
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 6.600

4.  In vivo mRNA delivery to virus-specific T cells by light-induced ligand exchange of MHC class I antigen-presenting nanoparticles.

Authors:  Fang-Yi Su; Qingyang Henry Zhao; Shreyas N Dahotre; Lena Gamboa; Swapnil Subhash Bawage; Aaron D Silva Trenkle; Ali Zamat; Hathaichanok Phuengkham; Rafi Ahmed; Philip J Santangelo; Gabriel A Kwong
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 14.957

5.  DNA-based artificial dendritic cells for in situ cytotoxic T cell stimulation and immunotherapy.

Authors:  Quoc-Viet Le; Jaiwoo Lee; Junho Byun; Gayong Shim; Yu-Kyoung Oh
Journal:  Bioact Mater       Date:  2021-12-23

6.  Indocyanine Green-Nexturastat A-PLGA Nanoparticles Combine Photothermal and Epigenetic Therapy for Melanoma.

Authors:  Debbie K Ledezma; Preethi B Balakrishnan; Juliana Cano-Mejia; Elizabeth E Sweeney; Melissa Hadley; Catherine M Bollard; Alejandro Villagra; Rohan Fernandes
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-17       Impact factor: 5.076

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.