Literature DB >> 31113728

Non-invasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with acute chest pain: Subgroup analysis of the ROMICAT II trial.

Maros Ferencik1, Michael T Lu2, Thomas Mayrhofer3, Stefan B Puchner4, Ting Liu5, Pal Maurovich-Horvat6, Khristine Ghemigian2, Alexander Ivanov2, Elizabeth Adami2, John T Nagurney7, Pamela K Woodard8, Quynh A Truong9, James E Udelson10, Udo Hoffmann2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive fractional flow reserve (FFRCT) derived from coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA) permits hemodynamic evaluation of coronary stenosis and may improve efficiency of assessment in stable chest pain patients. We determined feasibility of FFRCT in the population of acute chest pain patients and assessed the relationship of FFRCT with outcomes of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and revascularization and with plaque characteristics.
METHODS: We included 68 patients (mean age 55.8 ± 8.4 years, 71% men) from the ROMICAT II trial who had ≥50% stenosis on coronary CTA or underwent additional non-invasive stress test. We evaluated coronary stenosis and high-risk plaque on coronary CTA. FFRCT was measured in a core laboratory.
RESULTS: We found correlation between anatomic severity of stenosis and FFRCT ≤0.80 vs. FFRCT >0.80 (severe stenosis 84.8% vs. 15.2%; moderate stenosis 33.3% vs. 66.7%; mild stenosis 33.3% vs. 66.7% patients). Patients with severe stenosis had lower FFRCT values (median 0.64, 25th-75th percentile 0.50-0.75) as compared to patients with moderate (median 0.84, 25th-75th percentile, p < 0.001) or mild stenosis (median 0.86, 25th-75th percentile 0.78-0.88, p < 0.001). The relative risk of ACS and revascularization in patients with positive FFRCT ≤0.80 was 4.03 (95% CI 1.56-10.36) and 3.50 (95% CI 1.12-10.96), respectively. FFRCT ≤0.80 was associated with the presence of high-risk plaque (odds ratio 3.91, 95% CI 1.55-9.85, p = 0.004) after adjustment for stenosis severity.
CONCLUSION: Abnormal FFRCT was associated with the presence of ACS, coronary revascularization, and high-risk plaque. FFRCT measurements correlated with anatomic severity of stenosis on coronary CTA and were feasible in population of patients with acute chest pain.
Copyright © 2019 Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute coronary syndrome; Coronary computed tomography angiography; Non-invasive cardiac testing; Non-invasive fractional flow reserve; Risk stratification; Stress test

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31113728      PMCID: PMC6801016          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcct.2019.05.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr        ISSN: 1876-861X


  28 in total

1.  CT angiography for safe discharge of patients with possible acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Harold I Litt; Constantine Gatsonis; Brad Snyder; Harjit Singh; Chadwick D Miller; Daniel W Entrikin; James M Leaming; Laurence J Gavin; Charissa B Pacella; Judd E Hollander
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-26       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Central Core Laboratory versus Site Interpretation of Coronary CT Angiography: Agreement and Association with Cardiovascular Events in the PROMISE Trial.

Authors:  Michael T Lu; Nandini M Meyersohn; Thomas Mayrhofer; Daniel O Bittner; Hamed Emami; Stefan B Puchner; Borek Foldyna; Martin E Mueller; Steven Hearne; Clifford Yang; Stephan Achenbach; Quynh A Truong; Brian B Ghoshhajra; Manesh R Patel; Maros Ferencik; Pamela S Douglas; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-11-27       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Comparison of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography, Fractional Flow Reserve, and Perfusion Imaging for Ischemia Diagnosis.

Authors:  Roel S Driessen; Ibrahim Danad; Wijnand J Stuijfzand; Pieter G Raijmakers; Stefan P Schumacher; Pepijn A van Diemen; Jonathon A Leipsic; Juhani Knuuti; S Richard Underwood; Peter M van de Ven; Albert C van Rossum; Charles A Taylor; Paul Knaapen
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Noninvasive FFR Derived From Coronary CT Angiography: Management and Outcomes in the PROMISE Trial.

Authors:  Michael T Lu; Maros Ferencik; Rhonda S Roberts; Kerry L Lee; Alexander Ivanov; Elizabeth Adami; Daniel B Mark; Farouc A Jaffer; Jonathon A Leipsic; Pamela S Douglas; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2017-04-12

5.  Computed tomography-based high-risk coronary plaque score to predict acute coronary syndrome among patients with acute chest pain--Results from the ROMICAT II trial.

Authors:  Maros Ferencik; Thomas Mayrhofer; Stefan B Puchner; Michael T Lu; Pal Maurovich-Horvat; Ting Liu; Khristine Ghemigian; Pieter Kitslaar; Alexander Broersen; Fabian Bamberg; Quynh A Truong; Christopher L Schlett; Udo Hoffmann
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr       Date:  2015-07-10

6.  Coronary CT angiography versus standard evaluation in acute chest pain.

Authors:  Udo Hoffmann; Quynh A Truong; David A Schoenfeld; Eric T Chou; Pamela K Woodard; John T Nagurney; J Hector Pope; Thomas H Hauser; Charles S White; Scott G Weiner; Shant Kalanjian; Michael E Mullins; Issam Mikati; W Frank Peacock; Pearl Zakroysky; Douglas Hayden; Alexander Goehler; Hang Lee; G Scott Gazelle; Stephen D Wiviott; Jerome L Fleg; James E Udelson
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-07-26       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Computed Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve : A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christopher M Cook; Ricardo Petraco; Matthew J Shun-Shin; Yousif Ahmad; Sukhjinder Nijjer; Rasha Al-Lamee; Yuetsu Kikuta; Yasutsugu Shiono; Jamil Mayet; Darrel P Francis; Sayan Sen; Justin E Davies
Journal:  JAMA Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 14.676

8.  Diagnostic performance of noninvasive fractional flow reserve derived from coronary computed tomography angiography in suspected coronary artery disease: the NXT trial (Analysis of Coronary Blood Flow Using CT Angiography: Next Steps).

Authors:  Bjarne L Nørgaard; Jonathon Leipsic; Sara Gaur; Sujith Seneviratne; Brian S Ko; Hiroshi Ito; Jesper M Jensen; Laura Mauri; Bernard De Bruyne; Hiram Bezerra; Kazuhiro Osawa; Mohamed Marwan; Christoph Naber; Andrejs Erglis; Seung-Jung Park; Evald H Christiansen; Anne Kaltoft; Jens F Lassen; Hans Erik Bøtker; Stephan Achenbach
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Clinical outcomes of fractional flow reserve by computed tomographic angiography-guided diagnostic strategies vs. usual care in patients with suspected coronary artery disease: the prospective longitudinal trial of FFR(CT): outcome and resource impacts study.

Authors:  Pamela S Douglas; Gianluca Pontone; Mark A Hlatky; Manesh R Patel; Bjarne L Norgaard; Robert A Byrne; Nick Curzen; Ian Purcell; Matthias Gutberlet; Gilles Rioufol; Ulrich Hink; Herwig Walter Schuchlenz; Gudrun Feuchtner; Martine Gilard; Daniele Andreini; Jesper M Jensen; Martin Hadamitzky; Karen Chiswell; Derek Cyr; Alan Wilk; Furong Wang; Campbell Rogers; Bernard De Bruyne
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2015-09-01       Impact factor: 29.983

10.  Coronary plaque quantification and fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography angiography identify ischaemia-causing lesions.

Authors:  Sara Gaur; Kristian Altern Øvrehus; Damini Dey; Jonathon Leipsic; Hans Erik Bøtker; Jesper Møller Jensen; Jagat Narula; Amir Ahmadi; Stephan Achenbach; Brian S Ko; Evald Høj Christiansen; Anne Kjer Kaltoft; Daniel S Berman; Hiram Bezerra; Jens Flensted Lassen; Bjarne Linde Nørgaard
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 29.983

View more
  1 in total

1.  Machine learning-based CT fractional flow reserve assessment in acute chest pain: first experience.

Authors:  Matthias Eberhard; Tin Nadarevic; Andrej Cousin; Jochen von Spiczak; Ricarda Hinzpeter; Andre Euler; Fabian Morsbach; Robert Manka; Dagmar I Keller; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2020-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.