Literature DB >> 31113725

The efficacy and safety of sitafloxacin and garenoxacin for the treatment of pneumonia in elderly patients: A randomized, multicenter, open-label trial.

Taiga Miyazaki1, Shigeki Nakamura2, Kohji Hashiguchi3, Tsutomu Kobayashi4, Kiyoyasu Fukushima5, Yuichi Fukuda6, Akira Kondo7, Yuichi Inoue8, Hironobu Koga8, Eisuke Sasaki9, Yosuke Nagayoshi10, Yasuhito Higashiyama11, Masataka Yoshida12, Takahiro Takazono2, Tomomi Saijo2, Yoshitomo Morinaga2, Kazuko Yamamoto2, Yoshifumi Imamura2, Shinya Mikushi2, Koichi Izumikawa2, Katsunori Yanagihara2, Shigeru Kohno2, Hiroshi Mukae2.   

Abstract

Oral treatment for elderly outpatients with pneumonia is becoming increasingly important in this super-aged society from the perspective of cost-effectiveness and limited hospital capacities. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of two oral respiratory quinolones, sitafloxacin and garenoxacin, in elderly patients with pneumonia. This randomized, multicenter, open-label trial was conducted among patients aged ≥65 years with clinically and radiographically confirmed pneumonia in Japan. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either sitafloxacin (100 mg/day) or garenoxacin (400 mg/day) for 3-10 days. The primary efficacy endpoint was the clinical cure rate at 5-10 days after the end of treatment. From December 2013 to November 2017, we enrolled 120 patients at 11 hospitals and randomly assigned 59 patients to the sitafloxacin group (1 patient withdrew) and 61 patients to the garenoxacin group. These included 30 patients with nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia (NHCAP) (18 receiving sitafloxacin, 12 receiving garenoxacin) and 37 patients with aspiration pneumonia (16 receiving sitafloxacin, 21 receiving garenoxacin). The clinical cure rates in the sitafloxacin and garenoxacin groups were 88.5% (95% confidence interval: 76.6-95.6) and 88.9% (95% confidence interval: 77.4-95.8), respectively. No significant differences were observed in the incidence rates of drug-related adverse events between the sitafloxacin (20.7%; 12/58 patients) and garenoxacin (27.9%; 17/61 patients) groups. The most common adverse event was hepatic dysfunction, which occurred in seven patients in each group. We conclude that sitafloxacin and garenoxacin are comparably effective and safe for the treatment of pneumonia, including NHCAP and aspiration pneumonia, in elderly patients.
Copyright © 2019 Japanese Society of Chemotherapy and The Japanese Association for Infectious Diseases. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Aspiration pneumonia; Community-acquired pneumonia; Garenoxacin; Nursing and healthcare-associated pneumonia; Sitafloxacin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31113725     DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2019.04.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1341-321X            Impact factor:   2.211


  2 in total

1.  Sitafloxacin reduces tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα) converting enzyme (TACE) phosphorylation and activity to inhibit TNFα release from lipopolysaccharide-stimulated THP-1 cells.

Authors:  Ippei Sakamaki; Michika Fukushi; Wakana Ohashi; Yukie Tanaka; Kazuhiro Itoh; Kei Tomihara; Yoshihiro Yamamoto; Hiromichi Iwasaki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

2.  Sitafloxacin Expresses Potent Anti-Mycobacterium abscessus Activity.

Authors:  Siyuan He; Qi Guo; Lan Zhao; Liyun Xu; Junsheng Fan; Wenye Wu; Zhemin Zhang; Bing Li; Haiqing Chu
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 5.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.