| Literature DB >> 31113412 |
Yu Kuroiwa1, Tomoaki Fukui1, Shunsuke Takahara2, Sang Yang Lee3, Keisuke Oe1, Michio Arakura1, Yohei Kumabe1, Takahiro Oda1, Tomoyuki Matsumoto1, Takehiko Matsushita1, Toshihiro Akisue4, Yoshitada Sakai5, Ryosuke Kuroda1, Takahiro Niikura6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Bone defects may occur because of severe trauma, nonunion, infection, or tumor resection. However, treatments for bone defects are often difficult and have not been fully established yet. We previously designed an efficient system of topical cutaneous application of carbon dioxide (CO2) using a novel hydrogel, which facilitates CO2 absorption through the skin into the deep area within a limb. In this study, the effect of topical cutaneous application of CO2 on bone healing was investigated using a rat femoral defect model.Entities:
Keywords: Bone defect; Bone healing; CO2
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31113412 PMCID: PMC6530028 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-019-2601-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord ISSN: 1471-2474 Impact factor: 2.362
Fig. 1Representative intraoperative image. After exposing the femoral shaft, two pairs of tip-threaded 1.4-mm-diameter K-wires were placed in the proximal and distal femur. A bone defect of 1 mm was created between the proximal and distal pins by an oscillating saw, and a custom-made external fixator was attached to connect the pairs of pins
Fig. 2An illustration of the method of CO2 application in a rat femoral defect model. The affected limb was sealed in a polyethylene bag filled with 100% CO2 for 20 min a day
Fig. 3Radiographic evidence of bone healing in each group at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks after surgery. The number of samples with bone healing is represented under the radiograph
Healing and non-healing rates determined by radiographic assessment at 4 weeks
| Control | CO2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Healing | 2/11 (18.2%) | 8/11 (72.7%)* |
| Non-healing | 9/11 (81.8%) | 3/11 (27.3%) |
Bone healing was achieved in 8 rats (72.7%) in the CO2 group, whereas the femurs of 2 rats (18.2%) showed bone healing in the control group. There was a significant difference in the bone healing rate between the two groups.* p < 0.05 compared to the control group
Fig. 4Bone healing rates in each group determined by radiographic assessment at 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks. There was a significant difference in the bone healing rate between the two groups at 4 weeks. (*p < 0.05 in the indicated group)
Fig. 5Representative histological sections stained with Safranin-O/Fast Green. cb = cortical bone, ca = cartilage, and ft. = fibrous tissue. Bar = 500 μm
Fig. 6The degree of bone healing as indicated by the mean Allen’s score at 2 and 4 weeks. (n = 6 in each group) (*p < 0.05 in the indicated group)
Fig. 7Biomechanical assessment of a femoral defect as assessed by the three-point bending test at 4 weeks. (n = 5 in each group) Values were normalized relative to the contralateral, intact femur. (**p < 0.01 in the indicated groups)
Micro-computed tomography (μ-CT) measurement at 4 weeks
| Parameter | Control | CO2 |
|---|---|---|
| TMD (mg/cm3) | 605.6 ± 55.5 | 635.8 ± 55.2 |
| TV (cm3) | 0.062 ± 0.0097 | 0.063 ± 0.014 |
| BMC (mg) | 11.2 ± 2.83 | 15.7 ± 4.68 |
| vBMD (mg/cm3) | 180.9 ± 43.0 | 247.9 ± 49.9* |
The vBMD of the callus was significantly greater in the CO2 group than in the control group. * p < 0.05 compared to the control group. TMD tissue mineral density, TV total callus volume; BMC bone mineral content; vBMD volumetric bone mineral density (BMC/TV)
Fig. 8Expression level with standard error of VEGF of interest in each group at 3 weeks, which was measured by quantitative real-time PCR. (n = 6 in each group) (*p < 0.05 in the indicated group). VEGF, vascular endothelial growth factor