| Literature DB >> 31113374 |
Yongxin Zhao1, Kewang Hu1, Jisheng Zhang1, Yuhang Guo1, Xuecai Fan2, Yong Wang1, Sedzro Divine Mensah1,3, Xiaoli Zhang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To investigate the carbapenem resistance mechanisms and clonal relationship of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) strains isolated in the intensive care unit (ICU) of the First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University, management approaches to ICU clonal CRAB outbreaks were described.Entities:
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii; CC2; Carbapenem resistant; Infection control; OXA-23; Outbreak
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31113374 PMCID: PMC6530087 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-019-4073-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.667
Detection of CRAB (%) in ICU patients during the year 2010 to 2017
| Year | Total number of isolates in the ICU | Acinetobacter baumannii | CRAB | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| counts | detection ratea% | counts | detection rateb% | ||
| 2010 | 42 | 8 | 19.0 | 2 | 25.0 |
| 2011 | 48 | 5 | 10.4 | 4 | 80.0 |
| 2012 | 41 | 8 | 19.5 | 7 | 87.5 |
| 2013 | 65 | 12 | 18.5 | 10 | 83.3 |
| 2014 | 87 | 25 | 28.7 | 23 | 92.0 |
| 2015 | 117 | 56 | 47.9 | 18 | 32.1 |
| 2016 | 172 | 29 | 16.9 | 9 | 31.0 |
| 2017 | 230 | 79 | 34.4 | 9 | 11.4 |
Note: aThe ratio of the number of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates to the number of ICU bacterial isolates
bThe ratio of the number of CRAB isolates to the number of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates
Epidemiological, phenotypic, and genotypic data of Acinetobacter baumannii isolates and of patients
| Patient | ERIC-PCR | ST | Clinical sample | Hospital stay days | Outcome | Invasive procedure | OXA-23 | OXA-24 | OXA-51 | ISAbal | ISA-23 | TEM | ISA-51 | ADC | ISA-ADC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AB001 | A | 2 | sputum | 11 | death | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| AB013 | A | 2 | sputum | 22 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| AB020 | A | 2 | sputum | 30 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| AB071 | A | 2 | sputum | 15 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| AB033 | A | 2 | sputum | 5 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| AB063 | A | 2 | sputum | 65 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||||
| AB068 | A | 2 | blood | 25 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| AB073 | A | 2 | sputum | 13 | death | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| AB031 | B | 2 | sputum | 10 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| AB032 | B | 2 | sputum | 17 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| AB051 | B | 2 | sputum | 53 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| AB082 | B | 2 | sputum | 12 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| AB111 | B | 2 | sputum | 20 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| AB122 | B | 2 | sputum | 56 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| AB126 | B | 2 | sputum | 14 | death | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ||
| AB131 | B | 2 | sputum | 26 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| AB135 | B | 2 | sputum | 25 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| AB136 | B | 2 | sputum | 38 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| AB137 | B | 2 | sputum | 15 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| AB138 | B | 2 | sputum | 10 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | |||
| AB125 | C | 1199 | sputum | 65 | ordinary | YES | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
Note: ERIC-PCR:enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus- polymerase chain reaction; ST:sequence type determined by the Pasteur MLST
Comparison of donors and transconjugant resistance genes
| Number of isolates | 16sRNA (AB) | ST | ERIC-PCR | β-Lactamase | IS element | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| bla-OXA-51 | bla-OXA-23 | bla-OXA-24 | bla-ADC | bla-TEM | ISAbal | ISAbal- blaOXA-23 | ISAbal-blaOXA-51 | ISAbal-blaADC | ||||
| AB13 | + | 2 | A | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – |
| JC13 | – | no | no | + | + | – | – | + | + | – | – | – |
| AB33 | + | 2 | A | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | – | – |
| JC33 | – | no | no | + | + | – | – | + | + | – | – | – |
| AB51 | + | 2 | B | + | + | – | + | + | + | + | – | + |
| JC51 | – | no | no | + | + | – | – | – | + | + | – | – |
| AB63 | + | 2 | A | + | + | + | + | – | + | + | – | – |
| JC63 | – | no | no | + | + | + | – | – | + | – | – | – |
Note: AB13; AB33;AB51; AB63 are the donors bacteria, JC13;JC33;JC51;JC63 are the recipients
No:Not executed; ERIC-PCR:enterobacterial repetitive intergenic consensus- polymerase chain reaction; ST:sequence type determined with the Pasteur MLST scheme
Fig. 1Partial DNA fingerprinting of ERIC-PCR of Acinetobacter baumannii strain. Note:M: marker; typeA(1,13,33,63);typeB(51,31,32,131,135,136,137,138);typeC(125)
Fig. 2Dendrogram of Acinetobacter baumannii strains from ICU samples based on ERIC-PCR analysis. Note: The bottom bar indicates the similarity coefficient, the line on the left indicate the clusters formed in a 70% cut-off. Isolates of more than 90% similarity were treated as a single isolate