Literature DB >> 3111270

Hominid footprints at Laetoli: facts and interpretations.

T D White, G Suwa.   

Abstract

The history of discovery and interpretation of primate footprints at the site of Laetoli in northern Tanzania is reviewed. An analysis of the geological context of these tracks is provided. The hominid tracks in Tuff 7 at Site G in the Garusi River Valley demonstrate bipedality at a mid-Pliocene datum. Comparison of these tracks and the Hadar hominid foot fossils by Tuttle has led him to conclude that Australopithecus afarensis did not make the Tanzanian prints and that a more derived form of hominid is therefore indicated at Laetoli. An alternative interpretation has been offered by Stern and Susman who posit a conforming "transitional morphology" in both the Tanzanian prints and the Ethiopian bones. The present examines both hypotheses and shows that neither is likely to be entirely correct. To illustrate this point, a reconstruction of the foot skeleton of a female A. afarensis is undertaken, and the results are compared to the Laetoli tracks. We conclude that A. afarensis represents the best candidate for the maker of the Laetoli hominid trails.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3111270     DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.1330720409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol        ISSN: 0002-9483            Impact factor:   2.868


  23 in total

1.  A new hominin foot from Ethiopia shows multiple Pliocene bipedal adaptations.

Authors:  Yohannes Haile-Selassie; Beverly Z Saylor; Alan Deino; Naomi E Levin; Mulugeta Alene; Bruce M Latimer
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-03-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Phylogeny of early Australopithecus: new fossil evidence from the Woranso-Mille (central Afar, Ethiopia).

Authors:  Yohannes Haile-Selassie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  An early Australopithecus afarensis postcranium from Woranso-Mille, Ethiopia.

Authors:  Yohannes Haile-Selassie; Bruce M Latimer; Mulugeta Alene; Alan L Deino; Luis Gibert; Stephanie M Melillo; Beverly Z Saylor; Gary R Scott; C Owen Lovejoy
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-21       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Functional morphology of the ankle and the likelihood of climbing in early hominins.

Authors:  Jeremy M DeSilva
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Laetoli footprints reveal bipedal gait biomechanics different from those of modern humans and chimpanzees.

Authors:  Kevin G Hatala; Brigitte Demes; Brian G Richmond
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Locomotion and posture from the common hominoid ancestor to fully modern hominins, with special reference to the last common panin/hominin ancestor.

Authors:  R H Crompton; E E Vereecke; S K S Thorpe
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Laetoli footprints preserve earliest direct evidence of human-like bipedal biomechanics.

Authors:  David A Raichlen; Adam D Gordon; William E H Harcourt-Smith; Adam D Foster; Wm Randall Haas
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The role of load-carrying in the evolution of modern body proportions.

Authors:  W-J Wang; R H Crompton
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.610

Review 9.  Fossils, feet and the evolution of human bipedal locomotion.

Authors:  W E H Harcourt-Smith; L C Aiello
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 2.610

10.  The foot of Homo floresiensis.

Authors:  W L Jungers; W E H Harcourt-Smith; R E Wunderlich; M W Tocheri; S G Larson; T Sutikna; Rhokus Awe Due; M J Morwood
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-05-07       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.