Anas Ben Achour1, Heike Meißner2, Uwe Teicher3, Dominik Haim4, Ursula Range5, Alexander Brosius6, Henry Leonhardt4, Günter Lauer7. 1. Resident, Chair of Forming Processes, Institute of Manufacturing Technology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. Electronic address: anas.ben_achour@tu-dresden.de. 2. Resident, Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. 3. Resident, Chair of Forming Processes, Institute of Manufacturing Technology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. 4. Resident, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. 5. Resident, Institute for Medical Informatics and Biometry, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. 6. Professor and Head, Chair of Forming Processes, Institute of Manufacturing Technology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. 7. Professor and Head, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the biomechanical stability of osteosynthesis in mandibular condyle fractures using a newly designed rhombic 3-dimensional (3D) condylar fracture plate and compare it with that using standard two 4-hole miniplates and with that in nonfractured condyles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using 200 porcine mandibles, 3 different monocortical plating techniques were evaluated. The condyles were fractured along a defined line tangentially through the sigmoid notch and perpendicular to the posterior border. After anatomic reduction, osteosynthesis was performed using either standard rhombic 3D condylar fracture plates and standard screws (group A) or locking rhombic 3D condylar fracture plates, which were fixed either with standard screws (group B) or locking screws (group C). For comparison, nonfractured condyles (group D) and condyles fixed with standard two 4-hole miniplates and 8 screws (group E) were included. Using a universal mechanical testing machine (TIRA Test 2720; TIRA GmbH Schalkau, Germany), each group was subjected to linear loading from laterally to medially, medially to laterally, anteriorly to posteriorly, and posteriorly to anteriorly. The maximum axial force and displacement at the maximum force were measured. The mean values were compared for statistical significance using analysis of variance with Bonferroni's correction (statistical significance set at P < .05). RESULTS: The main mode of failure in the plating techniques investigated was the pull out of screws from the proximal fragment. We found no statistically significant differences in the stability of osteosynthesis between the two 4-hole miniplates and the rhombic 3D condylar fracture plate when loading from posteriorly to anteriorly, laterally to medially, and medially to laterally. However, when loading from anteriorly to posteriorly, a statistically significant difference between the standard and locking system and the two 4-hole miniplate system was observed, with the latter proving more stable. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present biomechanical study suggest that the rhombic 3D condylar fracture plates are suitable for the treatment of condylar neck fractures. Both types of the plate are able to resist physiologic strains comparable to the two 4-hole miniplates.
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the biomechanical stability of osteosynthesis in mandibular condyle fractures using a newly designed rhombic 3-dimensional (3D) condylar fracture plate and compare it with that using standard two 4-hole miniplates and with that in nonfractured condyles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using 200 porcine mandibles, 3 different monocortical plating techniques were evaluated. The condyles were fractured along a defined line tangentially through the sigmoid notch and perpendicular to the posterior border. After anatomic reduction, osteosynthesis was performed using either standard rhombic 3D condylar fracture plates and standard screws (group A) or locking rhombic 3D condylar fracture plates, which were fixed either with standard screws (group B) or locking screws (group C). For comparison, nonfractured condyles (group D) and condyles fixed with standard two 4-hole miniplates and 8 screws (group E) were included. Using a universal mechanical testing machine (TIRA Test 2720; TIRA GmbH Schalkau, Germany), each group was subjected to linear loading from laterally to medially, medially to laterally, anteriorly to posteriorly, and posteriorly to anteriorly. The maximum axial force and displacement at the maximum force were measured. The mean values were compared for statistical significance using analysis of variance with Bonferroni's correction (statistical significance set at P < .05). RESULTS: The main mode of failure in the plating techniques investigated was the pull out of screws from the proximal fragment. We found no statistically significant differences in the stability of osteosynthesis between the two 4-hole miniplates and the rhombic 3D condylar fracture plate when loading from posteriorly to anteriorly, laterally to medially, and medially to laterally. However, when loading from anteriorly to posteriorly, a statistically significant difference between the standard and locking system and the two 4-hole miniplate system was observed, with the latter proving more stable. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the present biomechanical study suggest that the rhombic 3D condylar fracture plates are suitable for the treatment of condylar neck fractures. Both types of the plate are able to resist physiologic strains comparable to the two 4-hole miniplates.