Literature DB >> 31112281

Systemic sclerostin antibody treatment increases osseointegration and biomechanical competence of zoledronic-acid-coated dental implants in a rat osteoporosis model.

P Korn1, I Kramer, F Schlottig, N Tödtman, U Eckelt, A Bürki, S J Ferguson, A Kautz, M Schnabelrauch, U Range, M Kneissel, B Stadlinger.   

Abstract

Osseointegration of dental implants can be promoted by implant-surface modifications using bisphosphonate coatings. In addition, it is of clinical interest to promote peri-implant bone formation and to restore bony structure in low bone-mass patients. The present study evaluated a combination of an anti-resorptive zoledronic acid (ZOL) implant-coating and a systemically applied sclerostin antibody, a known bone anabolic treatment principle, versus sole sclerostin antibody treatment or ZOL implant-coating in a rat osteoporosis model. Uncoated reference surface implants or ZOL-coated implants (n = 64/group) were inserted into the proximal tibia of aged osteoporotic rats three months following ovariectomy. 32 animals of each group received once weekly sclerostin antibody therapy. Osseointegration was assessed 2 or 4 weeks post-implantation by ex vivo µCT, histology and biomechanical testing. Overall implant survival rate was 97 %. Histomorphology revealed pronounced bone formation along the entire implant length of ZOL-coated implants. At 4 weeks following implant insertion, bone-implant contact, cancellous bone mineral density and bone volume/tissue volume were significantly increased for the combination of ZOL and sclerostin antibody as compared to sclerostin antibody or ZOL implant-coating alone. Removal torque was also significantly increased in the combination therapy group relative to animals receiving only sclerostin antibody therapy or ZOL-coated implants. In an osteoporotic rat model, the combination of anti-resorptive ZOL implant-coating and systemically applied sclerostin antibody led to significantly increased peri-implant bone formation. Therefore, the combination of ZOL and the osteoanabolic sclerostin antibody was more effective than either agent alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31112281     DOI: 10.22203/eCM.v037a20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Cell Mater        ISSN: 1473-2262            Impact factor:   3.942


  4 in total

1.  Anatomical similarity between the Sost-knockout mouse and sclerosteosis in humans.

Authors:  Uwe Y Schwarze; Toni Dobsak; Reinhard Gruber; Fred L Bookstein
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.064

Review 2.  Sclerostin is a promising therapeutic target for oral inflammation and regenerative dentistry.

Authors:  Chufang Liao; Shanshan Liang; Yining Wang; Ting Zhong; Xiangning Liu
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 8.440

3.  Effects of Dicationic Imidazolium-Based Ionic Liquid Coatings on Oral Osseointegration of Titanium Implants: A Biocompatibility Study in Multiple Rat Demographics.

Authors:  Sutton E Wheelis; Claudia C Biguetti; Shruti Natarajan; Bhuvana Lakkasetter Chandrashekar; Alexandra Arteaga; Jihad El Allami; Gustavo P Garlet; Danieli C Rodrigues
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-02       Impact factor: 4.141

4.  In vitro and in vivo Repair Effects of the NCF-Col-NHA Aerogel Scaffold Loaded With SOST Monoclonal Antibody and SDF-1 in Steroid-Induced Osteonecrosis.

Authors:  Bing Xu; Zeyu Luo; Duan Wang; Zeyu Huang; Zongke Zhou; Haoyang Wang
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-03-08
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.