Tamara Thurn1, Johanna Anneser1. 1. Palliative Care Team, Department of Psychosomatic Medicine and Psychotherapy, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Abstract
Background: Moral distress is a frequent phenomenon in end-of-life care. It occurs when one knows the morally correct response to an ethically challenging situation, but cannot act because of internal or external constraints. Medical students-having a perceived low level in the hospital hierarchy-may be particularly vulnerable to moral distress. Objective: To assess the frequency and intensity of medical students' moral distress occurring in end-of-life care. Design: We developed a questionnaire describing 10 potentially morally distressing scenarios in end-of-life care. Setting: The questionnaire was distributed to all fourth-year students of a German medical school. Measurements: We asked students (1) if they had ever witnessed the described scenarios and (2) to rate the extent (numeric rating scale 0-4) of moral distress for each situation. Results: Of 340 students, 217 (64%) completed the survey. On average, students had experienced 2.51 morally distressing situations (standard deviation = ±2.23). The majority of students (N = 163, 75%) had experienced at least one morally distressing situation. Providing futile care with the basic intention to make money was the item with the highest levels of experienced distress (2.88 ± 1.05), witnessed by 54 (25%) participants. Twenty-five students (12%) reported that they had thought about dropping out of medical school or choosing a nonclinical specialty because of moral distress. Conclusions: Medical students experience moral distress regularly and most frequently in scenarios of futile care. This may be an underestimated factor for medical school attrition. Interventions should identify the sources of moral distress and empower students to address their moral concerns.
Background: Moral distress is a frequent phenomenon in end-of-life care. It occurs when one knows the morally correct response to an ethically challenging situation, but cannot act because of internal or external constraints. Medical students-having a perceived low level in the hospital hierarchy-may be particularly vulnerable to moral distress. Objective: To assess the frequency and intensity of medical students' moral distress occurring in end-of-life care. Design: We developed a questionnaire describing 10 potentially morally distressing scenarios in end-of-life care. Setting: The questionnaire was distributed to all fourth-year students of a German medical school. Measurements: We asked students (1) if they had ever witnessed the described scenarios and (2) to rate the extent (numeric rating scale 0-4) of moral distress for each situation. Results: Of 340 students, 217 (64%) completed the survey. On average, students had experienced 2.51 morally distressing situations (standard deviation = ±2.23). The majority of students (N = 163, 75%) had experienced at least one morally distressing situation. Providing futile care with the basic intention to make money was the item with the highest levels of experienced distress (2.88 ± 1.05), witnessed by 54 (25%) participants. Twenty-five students (12%) reported that they had thought about dropping out of medical school or choosing a nonclinical specialty because of moral distress. Conclusions: Medical students experience moral distress regularly and most frequently in scenarios of futile care. This may be an underestimated factor for medical school attrition. Interventions should identify the sources of moral distress and empower students to address their moral concerns.
Entities:
Keywords:
end-of-life care; futile care; medical education; medical students, moral distress
Authors: Subha Perni; Lauren R Pollack; Wendy C Gonzalez; Elizabeth Dzeng; Matthew R Baldwin Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Rui Song Ryan Ong; Ruth Si Man Wong; Ryan Choon Hoe Chee; Chrystie Wan Ning Quek; Neha Burla; Caitlin Yuen Ling Loh; Yu An Wong; Amanda Kay-Lyn Chok; Andrea York Tiang Teo; Aiswarya Panda; Sarah Wye Kit Chan; Grace Shen Shen; Ning Teoh; Annelissa Mien Chew Chin; Lalit Kumar Radha Krishna Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2022-06-17 Impact factor: 3.263
Authors: Lisa X Liu; Mark Goldszmidt; Sara Calvert; Sarah Burm; Jacqueline Torti; Sayra Cristancho; Javeed Sukhera Journal: Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract Date: 2022-05-29 Impact factor: 3.629
Authors: Jolien Pieters; Diana H J M Dolmans; Daniëlle M L Verstegen; Franca C Warmenhoven; Annemie M Courtens; Marieke H J van den Beuken-van Everdingen Journal: BMC Palliat Care Date: 2019-08-28 Impact factor: 3.234
Authors: Hanna Hildesheim; Annette Rogge; Christoph Borzikowsky; Victoria Dorothea Witt; Eva Schäffer; Daniela Berg Journal: Neurol Res Pract Date: 2021-02-01
Authors: Subha Perni; Lauren R Pollack; Wendy C Gonzalez; Elizabeth Dzeng; Matthew R Baldwin Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2020-03-23 Impact factor: 2.463