Christopher Ma1,2, Nicola R Panaccione3, Tran M Nguyen4, Leonardo Guizzetti2, Claire E Parker2, Isra M Hussein4, Niels Vande Casteele2,5, Reena Khanna6, Parambir S Dulai7, Siddharth Singh7, Brian G Feagan2,6,8, Vipul Jairath2,6,8. 1. Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. 2. Robarts Clinical Trials, Inc., London, Ontario, Canada. 3. Faculty of Health Science, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. 4. Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. 5. Department of Medicine, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. 6. Division of Gastroenterology, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada. 7. Division of Gastroenterology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA. 8. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Nocebo effects, adverse outcomes occurring in patients receiving inert therapy, contribute to adverse event [AE] reporting in randomized controlled trials [RCTs]. High placebo AE rates may result in inaccurate estimation of treatment-related AEs. We estimate the pooled rate of AEs in patients randomized to placebo compared to active therapy in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] RCTs. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched to March 1, 2017 for RCTs of conventional medical therapies for Crohn's disease [CD] or ulcerative colitis [UC]. Rates of AEs, serious AEs [SAEs], AE-related trial withdrawal, infections and worsening IBD were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: We included 124 CD [n = 26 042] and 71 UC RCTs [n = 16 798]. The pooled placebo AE rate was 70.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65.3%, 75.4%) and 54.5% [47.8%, 61.1%] in CD and UC RCTs, respectively. There was no significant risk difference [RD] in AE, SAE or AE-related withdrawal rates between CD patients receiving placebo or active drug. A 1.6% [95% CI: 0.1%, 3.1%] increase in AE rates was observed among UC patients randomized to active therapy. Patients receiving active therapy had a higher risk of infection (RD 1.0% [95% CI: 0.4%, 1.7%] for CD, 2.9% [95% CI: 1.4%, 4.4%] for UC) although a lower risk of worsening CD (RD -3.2% [95% CI: -4.8%, -1.5%]) or UC (RD -3.7% [95% CI: -5.7%, -1.8%]). CONCLUSIONS: AEs are commonly reported by patients randomized to either placebo or active treatment in IBD RCTs. Clinically relevant differences in AE, SAE and AE-related withdrawal were not observed.
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Nocebo effects, adverse outcomes occurring in patients receiving inert therapy, contribute to adverse event [AE] reporting in randomized controlled trials [RCTs]. High placebo AE rates may result in inaccurate estimation of treatment-related AEs. We estimate the pooled rate of AEs in patients randomized to placebo compared to active therapy in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] RCTs. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL were searched to March 1, 2017 for RCTs of conventional medical therapies for Crohn's disease [CD] or ulcerative colitis [UC]. Rates of AEs, serious AEs [SAEs], AE-related trial withdrawal, infections and worsening IBD were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: We included 124 CD [n = 26 042] and 71 UC RCTs [n = 16 798]. The pooled placebo AE rate was 70.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 65.3%, 75.4%) and 54.5% [47.8%, 61.1%] in CD and UC RCTs, respectively. There was no significant risk difference [RD] in AE, SAE or AE-related withdrawal rates between CD patients receiving placebo or active drug. A 1.6% [95% CI: 0.1%, 3.1%] increase in AE rates was observed among UC patients randomized to active therapy. Patients receiving active therapy had a higher risk of infection (RD 1.0% [95% CI: 0.4%, 1.7%] for CD, 2.9% [95% CI: 1.4%, 4.4%] for UC) although a lower risk of worsening CD (RD -3.2% [95% CI: -4.8%, -1.5%]) or UC (RD -3.7% [95% CI: -5.7%, -1.8%]). CONCLUSIONS:AEs are commonly reported by patients randomized to either placebo or active treatment in IBD RCTs. Clinically relevant differences in AE, SAE and AE-related withdrawal were not observed.
Authors: Winfried Rief; Yvonne Nestoriuc; Anna von Lilienfeld-Toal; Imis Dogan; Franziska Schreiber; Stefan G Hofmann; Arthur J Barsky; Jerry Avorn Journal: Drug Saf Date: 2009 Impact factor: 5.606
Authors: Gary R Lichtenstein; Brian G Feagan; Russell D Cohen; Bruce A Salzberg; Robert H Diamond; Donny M Chen; Michelle L Pritchard; William J Sandborn Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2006-05 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Laurent Peyrin-Biroulet; Edward V Loftus; Jean-Frederic Colombel; William J Sandborn Journal: Am J Gastroenterol Date: 2009-10-27 Impact factor: 10.864
Authors: Andy Trotti; A Dimitrios Colevas; Ann Setser; Valerie Rusch; David Jaques; Volker Budach; Corey Langer; Barbara Murphy; Richard Cumberlin; C Norman Coleman; Philip Rubin Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 5.934
Authors: Tiziana Larussa; Antonio Basile; Caterina Palleria; Chiara Iannelli; Ada Vero; Lidia Giubilei; Caterina De Sarro; Evelina Suraci; Raffaella Marasco; Maria Imeneo; Emilio Russo; Ludovico Abenavoli; Giovambattista De Sarro; Francesco Luzza Journal: Med Pharm Rep Date: 2021-07-29
Authors: Jurij Hanzel; Ahmed Almradi; Alexandra C Istl; Mei Lucy Yang; Katherine A Fleshner; Claire E Parker; Leonardo Guizzetti; Christopher Ma; Siddharth Singh; Vipul Jairath Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2021-02-26 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Barry D Kyle; Terence A Agbor; Shajib Sharif; Usha Chauhan; John Marshall; Smita L S Halder; Stephen Ip; Waliul I Khan Journal: J Can Assoc Gastroenterol Date: 2020-03-27