Literature DB >> 31111736

The Genetically Modified Organism Medicinal Framework in Europe, United States, and Japan: Underlying Scientific Principles and Considerations Toward the Development of Gene Therapy and Genetically Modified Cell-Based Products.

Houria Bachtarzi1, Tim Farries1.   

Abstract

In vivo viral gene therapy and somatic cell therapy products (whether autologous, allogeneic, or xenogeneic) that have been subjected to an ex vivo gene transfer procedure will normally be classified as genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in Europe, not just the gene transfer vectors used in their construction. These products are, therefore, expected to fulfill certain environmental requirements with regard to the biosafety aspects of their clinical use (which may be subject to review by government departments responsible for environmental affairs). In the European Union (EU), clinical trials using GMOs generally require three levels of review (in addition to local review processes), which are often performed by separate national agencies. In this study, the principles under which certain EU member states control use of the GMOs in clinical trials under the definitions of either "contained use" or "deliberate release" will be discussed and evaluated from a scientific and a regulatory perspective, with comparisons with non-EU expectations as described by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and the Japanese living modified organisms (LMOs) regulations. For the latter, an understanding of the criteria under which LMOs exemptions apply, notably with respect to the nature of the viral construct used, the manufacturing process, and demonstration that there is no detectable residual replication-competent virus in the final gene-modified cells, is of paramount importance. Building on the existing European, U.S., and Japanese experience with GMOs/LMOs within the context of experimental gene and cell therapies, a through reflection on, and harmonization of, the current global GMO framework is needed to avoid unnecessary delays in clinical development and to ensure a smooth and a rapid access by patients to innovative life-saving therapies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  biosafety; clinical studies; environmental risk assessment; gene therapy; genetically modified cells; genetically modified organism

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31111736     DOI: 10.1089/humc.2019.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Gene Ther Clin Dev        ISSN: 2324-8637            Impact factor:   5.032


  5 in total

Review 1.  Impact of genetically modified organism requirements on gene therapy development in the EU, Japan, and the US.

Authors:  Gentaro Tajima; Seoan Huh; Natalie Anne Schmidt; Judith C Macdonald; Tobias Fleischmann; Keith Merrell Wonnacott
Journal:  Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 5.849

Review 2.  Genetically modified organisms: adapting regulatory frameworks for evolving genome editing technologies.

Authors:  Pablo Rozas; Eduardo I Kessi-Pérez; Claudio Martínez
Journal:  Biol Res       Date:  2022-10-20       Impact factor: 7.634

Review 3.  Reinforcing Collaboration and Harmonization to Unlock the Potentials of Advanced Therapy Medical Products: Future Efforts Are Awaited From Manufacturers and Decision-Makers.

Authors:  Tingting Qiu; Shuyao Liang; Yitong Wang; Claude Dussart; Borislav Borissov; Mondher Toumi
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-11-25

4.  Advanced Therapy Medicinal Products' Translation in Europe: A Developers' Perspective.

Authors:  Maja Pizevska; Jaspal Kaeda; Enrico Fritsche; Hisham Elazaly; Petra Reinke; Leila Amini
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-02-03

5.  ATMP Environmental Exposure Assessment in European Healthcare Settings: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Margaux Damerval; Christine Fagnoni-Legat; Aurélien Louvrier; Sarah Fischer; Samuel Limat; Anne-Laure Clairet; Virginie Nerich; Isabelle Madelaine; Marie Kroemer
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-01
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.