Literature DB >> 31111558

Electrophysiologic and anatomic factors predictive of a need for touch-up radiofrequency application for complete pulmonary vein isolation: Comparison between hot balloon- and cryoballoon-based ablation.

Yuji Wakamatsu1, Koichi Nagashima1, Shiro Nakahara2, Kazuki Iso1, Ryuta Watanabe1, Masaru Arai1, Naoto Otsuka1, Seina Yagyu1, Sayaka Kurokawa1, Kimie Ohkubo1, Toshiko Nakai1, Yasuo Okumura1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Although electrophysiologic and anatomic factors associated with the need for touch-up radiofrequency (RF) applications after cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) have been well described, those associated with the need for such touch-up after hot balloon ablation (HBA) have not. We aimed to identify factors predictive of the need for touch-up applications following HBA.
METHODS: Anatomic and electrophysiologic factors predictive of the need for touch-up RF ablation were compared between 46 propensity score-matched pairs of patients who underwent HBA or CBA for AF.
RESULTS: Touch-up RF ablation was more frequently required after HBA than after CBA (57% vs 30%, respectively; P = .01), and mostly at the anterior aspect of the left superior pulmonary vein (LSPV) carina after HBA (35%) but at the inferior aspect of the right inferior PV (RIPV) after CBA (71%). Post HBA touch-up was associated with male gender, a CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score ≤ 2, PV-left atrial bipolar voltage ≥ 1.35 mV, and PV trunk length ≥ 24.0 mm; post CBA touch-up associated with a history of heart failure.
CONCLUSION: Following balloon ablation for AF, there may be a need for touch-up applications, especially at the LSPV ridge after HBA but at the RIPV after CBA. It may behoove operators to expect a need for touch-up following HBA when patients are male, have a CHA2 DS 2 -VASc score ≤ 2 points, when PV-LA bipolar voltage is ≥ 1.35 mV, or when the PV trunk is ≥ 24.0 mm or following CBA when there is a history of heart failure.
© 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  atrial fibrillation; cryoballoon; hot balloon; pulmonary vein isolation; touch-up radiofrequency ablation

Year:  2019        PMID: 31111558     DOI: 10.1111/jce.13989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol        ISSN: 1045-3873


  3 in total

1.  Effects of Hot Balloon vs. Cryoballoon Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and Meta-Regression.

Authors:  Xinyi Peng; Xiao Liu; Hongbo Tian; Yu Chen; Xuexun Li
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2021-12-15

Review 2.  Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: State of the Art and Future Perspectives.

Authors:  Laura Rottner; Barbara Bellmann; Tina Lin; Bruno Reissmann; Tobias Tönnis; Ruben Schleberger; Moritz Nies; Christiane Jungen; Leon Dinshaw; Niklas Klatt; Jannis Dickow; Paula Münkler; Christian Meyer; Andreas Metzner; Andreas Rillig
Journal:  Cardiol Ther       Date:  2020-01-02

3.  Early experiences with three types of balloon-based ablation catheters in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Atsushi Kobori; Yasuhiro Sasaki; Misun Pak; Taiji Okada; Toshiaki Toyota; Kitae Kim; Takeshi Kitai; Natsuhiko Ehara; Makoto Kinoshita; Shuichiro Kaji; Yasuki Kihara; Yutaka Furukawa
Journal:  Heart Rhythm O2       Date:  2021-03-29
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.