Literature DB >> 31111254

Outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations.

Berat Demir1, Sıdıka Cesur2, Akın Sahin3, Adem Binnetoglu4, Ayca Ciprut2, Caglar Batman3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the surgical experience and auditory functions and progress of speech development of cochlear implantation in malformed ears.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 1995 and July 2017, thirty-seven patients (26 females and 11 males; mean age: 138.275 ± 96.24 months) with diverse anomalies of the inner ear were retrospectively examined for surgical and audiological results. Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR), Categories of Auditory Perception (CAP), Pure Tone Average (PTA), Speech Intelligibility Rating (SRT), and Word Discrimination Score (WDS) were the audiological tests used to evaluate the efficacy of CI in the malformed inner ears.
RESULTS: CSF gusher was experienced by six patients (three with LVA (large vestibular aqueduct), one with IP (incomplete partition) I, and two with both IP II Mondini malformations and LVA). Two patients had transient facial paresis after surgery. All patients fully recovered within 6 months. The postoperative PTA, SRT, and WDS test results showed significant differences between progressive and congenital sensorineural hearing loss (p values < 0.05 for all). On the other hand, the postoperative CAP and SIR test results revealed no significant differences between the two groups. According to etiology, the PTA and SRT values were significantly lower in common cavity patients than the LVA patients (p values < 0.01); no significant differences were found among the other etiological groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Cochlear implantation is safe in children with inner ear malformations. However, the success rate is low compared to patients with normal anatomy in terms of audiological results; the most successful group of patients with inner ear malformation is large vestibular aqueduct.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Auditory performance; Cochlear implantation; Congenital inner ear anomaly; Sensorineural hearing loss; Speech development

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31111254     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-019-05475-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  5 in total

1.  Evaluating Reasons for Revision Surgery and Device Failure Rates in Patients Who Underwent Cochlear Implantation Surgery.

Authors:  So Yeon Kim; Min Bum Kim; Won-Ho Chung; Yang-Sun Cho; Sung Hwa Hong; Il Joon Moon
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 6.223

2.  Systematic review of cochlear implantation in patients with inner ear malformations.

Authors:  Sunny Shah; Rameen Walters; Jake Langlie; Camron Davies; Ariel Finberg; Maria-Pia Tuset; Dario Ebode; Rahul Mittal; Adrien A Eshraghi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-10-21       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 3.  Cochlear implantation in common cavity deformity: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ayshah Al-Mahboob; Salman F Alhabib; Yassin Abdelsamad; Farid Alzhrani
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  Do the Age of Implantation, the Widths of Internal Acoustic Canal and Bony Cochlear Nerve Canal Affect the Auditory Performance of Primary School Children with Bilateral Cochlear Implants?

Authors:  Ozan Özdemir; Abdullah Soydan Mahmutoğlu; Enes Yiğit; Mustafa Çakır; Özgür Yiğit
Journal:  Turk Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-08-31

5.  Variables influencing executive functioning in preschool hearing-impaired children implanted within 24 months of age: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Maria Nicastri; Ilaria Giallini; Martina Amicucci; Laura Mariani; Marco de Vincentiis; Antonio Greco; Letizia Guerzoni; Domenico Cuda; Giovanni Ruoppolo; Patrizia Mancini
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-09-11       Impact factor: 2.503

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.