| Literature DB >> 31111112 |
Al Shimaa Gamal Shalaby1, Tamer I M Ragab1, Mohamed M I Helal1, Mona A Esawy1.
Abstract
The influence of class="Gene">tyrosinase in catalyzes/stimulates theEntities:
Keywords: Cancer research; Microbiology
Year: 2019 PMID: 31111112 PMCID: PMC6512574 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01657
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Fig. 1Phylogenetic tree of Bacillus licheniformis.
Effect of different parameters on production of Bacillus licheniformis monophenolase and diphenolase.
| The influence different parameters on tyrosinase and diphenolase productivity | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oxygen conc. (%) | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | Open air | - | - |
| Daiphenolase (U/mL) | 0 | 14.14 ± 0.02 | 16.7 ± 0.03 | 29 ± 0.00 | 24.1 ± 0.02 | - | - |
| Monophenolase (U/mL) | 0 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | 1.18 ± 0.01 | 2.7 ± 0.04 | 3 ± 0.01 | ||
| Temp. ( | 30* | 40 | 45 | *50 | 55 | 60 | 65 |
| Daiphenolase (U/mL) | 17 ± 0.01 | 28.57 ± 0.05 | 229 ± 0.09 | 32.71 ± 0.04 | 35 ± 0.03 | 39.29 ± 0.03 | 35.42 ± 0.02 |
| Monophenolase (U/mL) | 1.42 ± 0.90 | 2.70 ± 0.00 | 3.05 ± 0.01 | 4.28 ± 0.02 | 5.57 ± 0.02 | 8.10 ± 0.01 | 8.22 ± 0.00 |
| pHs | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | - |
| Daiphenolase (U/mL) | 35.7 ± 0.03 | 37.28 ± 0.05 | 39.28 ± 0.04 | 45.7 ± 0.04 | 46 ± 0.02 | 44.57 ± 0.02 | - |
| Monophenolase (U/mL) | 51.5 ± 0.90 | 60 ± 0.07 | 68 ± 0.03 | 72 ± 0.03 | 77 ± 0.09 | 76 ± 0.06 | - |
| Cu2+(mg) | 1.25* | 2.5 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 20 | - |
| Daiphenolase (U/mL) | 45.71 ± 0.05 | 107.42 ± 0.03 | 147.86 ± 0.03 | 188 ± 0.90 | 116 ± 06 | 100 ± 0.07 | |
| Monophenolase (U/mL) | 11 ± 0.04 | 22 ± 0.04 | 27.57 ± 0.07 | 33.57 ± 0.06 | 26.42 ± 0.06 | 14.30 ± 0.05 | |
| N. sources (1 g/L) | Peptone | Tryptone | Yeast extract | Malt | Beef extract | Liver extract | C* (without) |
| Daiphenolase activity | 217 ± 0.90 | 203 ± 1 | 207.60 ± 0.66 | 189 ± 2.0 | 227 ± 0.90 | 229 ± 0.80 | 189 ± 0.980 |
| Monophenolase (U/mL) | 56.57 ± 0.09 | 37.71 ± 0.04 | 33 ± 0.02 | 51 ± 0.02 | 33 ± 0.04 | 58.57 ± 0.01 | 34.42 ± 0.02 |
| C. sources (1 g/L) | Mannose | Maltose | Fructose | Glucose | Galactose | Raffinose | C*(without) |
| Daiphenolase (U/mL) | 247 ± 0.90 | 253 ± 0.90 | 181 ± 1.50 | 258.6 ± 0.70 | 262 ± 0.90 | 251.70 ± 1.40 | 230 ± 0.80 |
| Monophenolase (U/mL) | 362 ± 0.50 | 224 ± 0.70 | 77 ± 0.70 | 399 ± 1.00 | 87.57 ± 0.70 | 125 ± 0.70 | 59 ± 0.80 |
C* = Control.
Fig. 2UV-Vis absorption spectra of extracted black and brown eumelanin.
Fig. 3FTIR spectra of extracted black and brown eumelanin.
Fig. 4SEM of extracted black and brown eumelanin.
Fig. 5EDAX elemental analysis of (A) brown and (B) black eumelanin.
EDAX elemental weight % of brown and black eumelanin.
| Elements | Weight % | Atomic % | Net Int. | Error % | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brown melanin | Black melanin | Brown melanin | Black melanin | Brown melanin | Black melanin | Brown melanin | Black melanin | |
| C K | 32.36 | 35.46 | 49.2 | 51.39 | 13.98 | 27.91 | 15.86 | 13.87 |
| N K | 3.67 | 1.4 | 4.79 | 1.74 | 1.33 | 0.82 | 64.95 | 86.06 |
| O K | 11.04 | 17.04 | 12.6 | 18.53 | 14.51 | 37.84 | 16.24 | 13.66 |
| NaK | 24.08 | 21.86 | 19.13 | 16.56 | 163.06 | 223.3 | 8.34 | 8.34 |
| MgK | 0.33 | 0.36 | 0.25 | 0.26 | 2.51 | 4.35 | 68.69 | 29.65 |
| SiK | - | 0.44 | - | 0.27 | - | 9.06 | - | 22.47 |
| P K | 0.48 | 0.36 | 0.28 | 0.2 | 5.95 | 7.27 | 31.88 | 31.13 |
| ClK | 25.45 | 21.39 | 13.11 | 10.5 | 332.19 | 450.77 | 3.15 | 2.87 |
| FeK | 0.36 | - | 0.12 | - | 1.69 | - | 65.16 | - |
| SeK | 2.23 | - | 0.52 | - | 1.52 | - | 66.56 | - |
| KK | - | 0.29 | - | 0.13 | - | 4.71 | - | 61.52 |
| CaK | - | 0.46 | - | 0.2 | - | 6.63 | - | 59.51 |
In vitro anticancer activity for Bacillus subtilis melanin by SRB assay (IC50 ± SE μg/mL).
| Compounds | IC50 μg/mL. | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCF-7 | HEPG-2 | HCT-116 | HFB4 | |
| Black melanin | 7.91 ± 0.94 | 6.15 ± 0.74 | 5.54 ± 0.25 | 46.6838 |
| Brown melanin | 10.07 ± 01.33 | 9.74 ± 0.89 | 8.75 ± 1 | 98.5724 |
| Dox. | 2.96 | 4.05 | 4.45 | 5.00 |