| Literature DB >> 31111051 |
Dongxiang Pan1, Prasit Palittapongarnpim2,3, Angkana Chaiprasert4, Mei Lin5, Dingwen Lin5, Xi Long1, Liwen Huang5, Huifang Qin5, Edward McNeil6, Rushu Lan5, Xiaoqiang Qiu1, Virasakdi Chongsuvivatwong6.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the infectivity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) genotypes of index cases in the classroom of adolescent schools in Guangxi, China.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31111051 PMCID: PMC6487147 DOI: 10.1155/2019/3980658
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Figure 1TST screening result distribution for each contact class sorted by the class size.
Figure 215-loci MIRU-VNTR and spoligotyping pattern of index cases and contact cases.
Figure 3The phylogenetic tree of 16 index case isolates and 4 contacts isolates. Note: the number represented the isolate ID number. ID numbers 1-16 were index cases isolates; ID numbers 17-20 were contact cases isolates.
Characteristics of index cases by genotypes of M.tb (N=117).
| Variable | Genotype of index case [n (%)] |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beijing (n=7) | Non-Beijing (n=9) | Unknown (n=101) | ||
|
| ||||
| Middle school | 3 (6.7) | 2 (4.4) | 40 (88.9) | 0.701 |
| High school | 4 (5.6) | 7 (9.7) | 61 (84.7) | |
|
| ||||
| Male | 0 (0) | 8 (14.5) | 47 (85.5) |
|
| Female | 7 (11.3) | 1 (1.6) | 54 (87.1) | |
|
| ||||
| Han | 5 (7.9) | 5 (7.9) | 53 (84.1) | 0.666 |
| Others | 2 (3.7) | 4 (7.4) | 48 (88.9) | |
|
| ||||
| Absent | 3 (7) | 4 (9.3) | 36 (83.7) | 0.768 |
| Present | 4 (5.4) | 5 (6.8) | 65 (87.8) | |
|
| ||||
| Negative | 5 (6.8) | 5 (6.8) | 64 (86.5) | 0.839 |
| Positive | 2 (4.7) | 4 (9.3) | 37 (86) | |
|
| ||||
| No | 4 (4.8) | 6 (7.2) | 73 (88) | 0.61 |
| Yes | 3 (8.8) | 3 (8.8) | 28 (82.4) | |
Characteristics of contacts (N=6512) and contact screening outcomes by genotypes of index cases.
| Variable | Genotype of index case [n (%)] |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unknown (n=5625) | Non-Beijing (n=468) | Beijing (n=419) | ||
|
| ||||
| Middle school | 2156 (88.6) | 82 (3.4) | 196 (8.1) | < 0.001 |
| High school | 3469 (85.1) | 386 (9.5) | 223 (5.5) | |
|
| ||||
| Male | 2788 (85.6) | 231 (7.1) | 237 (7.3) | 0.021 |
| Female | 2837 (87.1) | 237 (7.3) | 182 (5.6) | |
|
| ||||
| Han | 2339 (92.5) | 164 (6.5) | 26 (1.0) | < 0.001 |
| Others | 3286 (82.5) | 304 (7.6) | 393 (9.9) | |
|
| ||||
| Absence | 3910 (85.1) | 384 (8.4) | 302 (6.6) | < 0.001 |
| Presence | 1715 (89.5) | 84 (4.4) | 117 (6.1) | |
|
| ||||
| 0-5 mm | 4623 (86.8) | 407 (7.6) | 298 (5.6) | < 0.001 |
| 6-9 mm | 544 (83.8) | 26 (4) | 79 (12.2) | |
| 10-14 mm | 238 (84.4) | 18 (6.4) | 26 (9.2) | |
| ≥ 15 mm (without TB) | 183 (88) | 10 (4.8) | 15 (7.2) | |
| ≥ 15 mm (with TB) | 37 (82.2) | 7 (15.6) | 1 (2.2) | |
Multivariate ordered logistic regression analysis to choose the best model.
| Variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 | Model 5 | Model 6 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Index case genotypes | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| Sex of index case | - | + | + | + | + | + |
| School types | - | - | + | + | + | + |
| Sex of contacts | - | - | - | + | + | + |
| Ethnicity of contacts | - | - | - | - | + | + |
| BCG scar of contacts | - | - | - | - | - | + |
| AIC | 8762.1 | 8743.9 | 8692.0 | 8692.4 | 8686.7 | 8631.5 |
|
| <0.001c | <0.001 c | 0.200 c | 0.010 d | <0.001d |
Note: ccompared to the preceding model; dcompared to Model 3.
Ordered logistic regression for genotypes of index cases to the outcome of contact screening.
| Variables | Contact screening results | Ordinal adjusted OR (95% CI) |
| ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0-5 mm | 6-9 mm | 10-14 mm | ≥ 15 mm (without TB) | ≥ 15 mm (with TB) | |||
|
| |||||||
| Non-Beijing | 407 (87) | 26 (5.6) | 18 (3.8) | 10 (2.1) | 7 (1.5) | 1 | |
| Beijing | 298 (71.1) | 79 (18.9) | 26 (6.2) | 15 (3.6) | 1 (0.2) | 1.34 (0.93, 1.95) | 0.057 |
| Unknown | 4623 (82.2) | 544 (9.7) | 238 (4.2) | 183 (3.3) | 37 (0.7) | 1.12 (0.85, 1.51) | 0.221 |
|
| |||||||
| Male | 2575 (84.8) | 291 (9.6) | 82 (2.7) | 64 (2.1) | 26 (0.9) | ||
| Female | 2753 (79.2) | 358 (10.3) | 200 (5.8) | 144 (4.1) | 19 (0.5) | 1.39 (1.21, 1.60) | <0.001 |
|
| |||||||
| High school | 3453 (84.7) | 383 (9.4) | 121 (3) | 100 (2.5) | 21 (0.5) | 1 | |
| Middle school | 1875 (77) | 266 (10.9) | 161 (6.6) | 108 (4.4) | 24 (1) | 1.65 (1.45, 1.88) | <0.001 |
|
| |||||||
| Male | 2671 (82) | 348 (10.7) | 140 (4.3) | 75 (2.3) | 22 (0.7) | 1 | |
| Female | 2657 (81.6) | 301 (9.2) | 142 (4.4) | 133 (4.1) | 23 (0.7) | 1.10 (0.97, 1.25) | 0.07 |
|
| |||||||
| Han | 2196 (86.8) | 128 (5.1) | 102 (4) | 69 (2.7) | 34 (1.3) | 1 | <0.001 |
| Non-Han | 3132 (78.6) | 521 (13.1) | 180 (4.5) | 139 (3.5) | 11 (0.3) | 1.71 (1.48, 1.97) | |
|
| |||||||
| Present | 3810 (82.9) | 397 (8.6) | 211 (4.6) | 143 (3.1) | 35 (0.8) | 1 | |
| Absent | 1518 (79.2) | 252 (13.2) | 71 (3.7) | 65 (3.4) | 10 (0.5) | 1.19 (1.04, 1.37) | <0.001 |
Figure 4