| Literature DB >> 31110689 |
Ling-Xianzi He1,2, Zhi-Qing Jia1,2, Qing-Xue Li1,2, Li-Li Feng1, Kai-Yue Yang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Research into the variability of fine-root decomposition and nutrient cycling processes in arid and semiarid ecosystems is highly significant not only for investigations of regional and global carbon and nitrogen cycling but also for offering a theoretical basis for vegetation restoration and reconstruction. In particular, information is limited on fine-root decomposition processes and nutrient releasing characteristics in the high-altitude Qinghai Gonghe basin, which has different tree species and variable fine-root diameters.Entities:
Keywords: Alpine sandy land; Gonghe basin; decomposition rate; fine‐root; nutrient release rate
Year: 2019 PMID: 31110689 PMCID: PMC6509441 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.5133
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Location of the study area, Gonghe County, Qinghai Province, China
Characteristics of sample plots
| Plot information |
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Quadrat (m*m) | 5*5 | 5*5 | 5*5 | 5*5 |
| Altitude (m) | 2,881 | 2,881 | 2,878 | 2,878 |
| Biotope | Dune slack | Dune slack | Semifixed dune | semifixed dune |
| Forestation technique | Cuttage | Cuttage | Bunch planting, clay–sand barrier | bunch planting, clay–sand barrier |
| Accompanying species |
|
|
|
|
| Mean height (m) | 2.98 ± 0.06 | 2.74 ± 0.06 | 1.61 ± 0.03 | 2.21 ± 0.11 |
| Plant crown (m*m) | 4.20*4.04 | 3.05*2.84 | 1.97*2.02 | 2.26 * 2.18 |
| Canopy coverage (%) | 80 | 75 | 25 | 35 |
| Soil type | Sandy soil (clay) | Sandy soil (clay) | Sandy soil | sandy soil |
| Soil bulk density (g cm−3) | 1.51 ± 0.04 | 1.44 ± 0.01 | 1.42 ± 0.08 | 1.49 ± 0.06 |
| Soil moisture (%) | 7.85 ± 0.03 | 9.64 ± 0.02 | 2.45 ± 0.01 | 2.01 ± 0.01 |
| Soil organic carbon (g kg−1) | 7.24 ± 1.19 | 11.44 ± 1.35 | 4.01 ± 1.05 | 3.39 ± 0.93 |
| Soil total N (g kg−1) | 0.73 ± 0.12 | 1.11 ± 0.07 | 0.54 ± 0.09 | 0.34 ± 0.05 |
| Soil total P (g kg−1) | 0.61 ± 0.01 | 0.64 ± 0.03 | 0.46 ± 0.02 | 0.47 ± 0.05 |
| Soil total K (g kg−1) | 18.20 ± 0.81 | 18.71 ± 0.51 | 16.54 ± 0.28 | 16.46 ± 1.07 |
Soil from the upper 20–40 cm of the soil profile was analyzed in this study.
Values are expressed as the mean ± SE, with a replication number of five.
Figure 2Mass residual ratio of fine‐roots with different diameters among four shrub species during 489 days of decomposition
Olson exponential regression analysis of fine‐roots mass residual ratio for four species with different diameters
| Species | Diameter (mm) | Decomposition coefficient (kg kg−1 a−1) | Measured value of 489 days residue (%) | Predicted value of 489 days residue (%) |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 1–2 | 0.1595 | 66.438 | 68.281 | 3.29 | 17.73 |
| 0.5–1 | 0.1012 | 68.603 | 71.164 | 4.25 | 23.23 | |
| ≤0.5 | 0.0733 | 77.463 | 78.999 | 7.58 | 39.00 | |
|
| 1–2 | 0.1181 | 68.820 | 69.824 | 4.17 | 23.66 |
| 0.5–1 | 0.0964 | 70.729 | 74.243 | 5.24 | 27.99 | |
| ≤0.5 | 0.0443 | 82.225 | 82.782 | 12.72 | 64.72 | |
|
| 1–2 | 0.2053 | 39.940 | 45.658 | 0.79 | 12.57 |
| 0.5–1 | 0.1703 | 47.427 | 49.385 | 1.20 | 14.96 | |
| ≤0.5 | 0.1559 | 54.719 | 55.986 | 2.51 | 17.18 | |
|
| 1–2 | 0.1647 | 43.548 | 50.211 | 1.36 | 14.77 |
| 0.5–1 | 0.1213 | 46.495 | 50.846 | 1.44 | 26.41 | |
| ≤0.5 | 0.0881 | 58.200 | 59.076 | 2.61 | 27.35 |
Initial C, N, P, and K concentrations and their ratios for roots of four shrub species with three different diameters
| Plot Information | Species | Diameter (mm) | C (g kg−1) | N (g kg−1) | P (g kg−1) | K (g kg−1) | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Land among Sandy Dunes |
| 1–2 | 469.07 ± 5.27Aa | 6.55 ± 0.18Db | 1.81 ± 0.04Bb | 5.64 ± 0.16Ca | 71.68 ± 1.20Aa | 258.89 ± 5.12Ba | 3.61 ± 0.11Cb |
| 0.5–1 | 461.84 ± 8.73Aa | 6.73 ± 0.23Db | 1.88 ± 0.04Bb | 5.75 ± 0.07Ca | 68.72 ± 1.07Aa | 246.14 ± 7.1Ba | 3.59 ± 0.15Cb | ||
| ≤0.5 | 451.40 ± 3.46Aa | 9.73 ± 0.46Ca | 2.03 ± 0.03Bba | 6.05 ± 0.22Ba | 46.61 ± 2.23Ab | 221.98 ± 3.78Bb | 4.78 ± 0.15Ba | ||
|
| 1–2 | 478.63 ± 1.33Aa | 8.42 ± 0.31Cb | 2.06 ± 0.06Aa | 5.21 ± 0.27Cb | 57.00 ± 1.97Ba | 232.64 ± 5.72Ba | 4.08 ± 0.04Cb | |
| 0.5–1 | 470.92 ± 1.16Aa | 8.77 ± 0.09Cb | 2.11 ± 0.09Aa | 5.39 ± 0.11Cb | 53.71 ± 0.68Ba | 224.49 ± 9.63Ba | 4.18 ± 0.13Cb | ||
| ≤0.5 | 434.78 ± 5.38Ab | 10.94 ± 0.30Ca | 2.27 ± 0.05Aa | 6.86 ± 0.39Ba | 39.82 ± 1.54Bb | 192.11 ± 6.17Bb | 4.83 ± 0.16Ba | ||
| Semifixed Sandy Dunes |
| 1–2 | 465.48 ± 5.59Aa | 40.47 ± 0.82Aa | 0.91 ± 0.02Cb | 8.26 ± 0.01Ab | 11.51 ± 0.25Ca | 513.06 ± 11.42Aa | 44.57 ± 0.05Aa |
| 0.5–1 | 462.40 ± 1.82Aa | 40.26 ± 0.68Aa | 0.96 ± 0.02Cab | 9.01 ± 0.09Aa | 11.49 ± 0.19Da | 480.87 ± 11.23Aa | 41.84 ± 0.32Ab | ||
| ≤0.5 | 412.43 ± 6.45Bb | 33.56 ± 1.62Ab | 1.04 ± 0.04Ca | 9.19 ± 0.09Aa | 12.33 ± 0.41Ca | 398.80 ± 13.26Ab | 32.36 ± 0.66Ac | ||
|
| 1–2 | 465.42 ± 3.27Aa | 33.91 ± 0.44Ba | 0.95 ± 0.04Ca | 6.26 ± 0.14Ba | 13.73 ± 0.25Ca | 490.47 ± 26.08Aa | 35.68 ± 1.38Ba | |
| 0.5–1 | 459.59 ± 2.29Aa | 33.71 ± 0.88Ba | 0.96 ± 0.02Ca | 6.54 ± 0.26Ba | 13.65 ± 0.34Ca | 481.42 ± 8.51Aa | 35.32 ± 1.30Ba | ||
| ≤0.5 | 391.23 ± 6.31Cb | 30.16 ± 0.63Bb | 0.99 ± 0.04Ca | 6.85 ± 0.17Ba | 12.97 ± 0.08Ca | 395.00 ± 15.91Ab | 30.44 ± 1.13Ab |
Different capital and lowercase letters represent significant differences among different species for the same fine‐root diameter and among different fine‐root diameters for the same species, respectively (p < 0.05).
Value are expressed as the mean ± SE, with a replication number of five.
Figure 3C, N, P, and K release rates of fine‐roots with different diameters among four shrub species
Three‐way ANOVA for mass loss ratio and C, N, P, and K release rates
| Variation source |
| Mass loss ratio | C release rate | N release rate | P release rate | K release rate | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | F | P | ||
|
| 3 | 806.606 | <0.001 | 3.414 | 0.034 | 7.204 | 0.001 | 1.108 | 0.365 | 0.468 | 0.708 |
|
| 2 | 135.18 | <0.001 | 1.998 | 0.158 | 0.213 | 0.81 | 1.339 | 0.281 | 0.215 | 0.808 |
|
| 4 | 82.621 | <0.001 | 55.654 | <0.001 | 24.33 | <0.001 | 122.743 | <0.001 | 357.341 | <0.001 |
|
| 6 | 1.596 | 0.192 | 0.392 | 0.877 | 0.297 | 0.932 | 0.255 | 0.952 | 0.463 | 0.829 |
|
| 12 | 1.702 | 0.129 | 3.297 | 0.006 | 6.3 | <0.001 | 3.776 | 0.003 | 2.05 | 0.065 |
|
| 8 | 2.558 | 0.036 | 2.454 | 0.042 | 0.748 | 0.65 | 1.555 | 0.191 | 0.858 | 0.564 |
S, D and T represent tree species, diameter size, and time, respectively.
Correlation coefficients between fine‐root mass loss ratio and initial nutrient concentrations for four shrub species
| Time (d) | C | N | P | K | C/N | C/P | N/P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 61 | −0.034 | 0.957 | −0.931 | 0.731 | −0.832 | 0.970 | 0.967 |
| 122 | 0.046 | 0.922 | −0.913 | 0.680 | −0.770 | 0.957 | 0.938 |
| 367 | 0.147 | 0.724 | −0.582 | 0.662 | −0.639 | 0.706 | 0.719 |
| 428 | 0.085 | 0.920 | −0.956 | 0.652 | −0.776 | 0.958 | 0.938 |
| 489 | 0.041 | 0.900 | −0.938 | 0.545 | −0.749 | 0.976 | 0.927 |
Significant difference (p < 0.05) and
Extremely significant difference (p < 0.01), respectively.
Correlation coefficients between fine‐root mass loss ratio and nutrient contents of four shrub species
| Nutrients | Diameter (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1–2 | 0.5–1 | ≤0.5 | |
| C | −0.683 | −0.654 | −0.312 |
| N | 0.666 | 0.851 | 0.900 |
| P | −0.844 | −0.926 | −0.917 |
| K | 0.223 | 0.19 | 0.15 |
Extremely significant difference (p < 0.01).
Correlation coefficients between fine‐root mass loss ratio and initial soil environmental factors of four shrub species
| Soil environmental factors | Diameter (mm) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1–2 | 0.5–1 | ≤0.5 | |
| Soil water content | −0.249 | −0.197 | −0.185 |
| Soil bulk density | −0.325 | −0.307 | −0.296 |
| C | −0.283 | −0.188 | −0.148 |
| N | −0.284 | −0.202 | −0.108 |
| P | −0.531 | −0.456 | −0.426 |
| K | 0.533 | 0.620 | 0.596 |
Significant difference (p < 0.05).