| Literature DB >> 31110560 |
A Jebali1,2, F G Acién2, N Jiménez-Ruiz2, C Gómez2, J M Fernández-Sevilla2, N Mhiri1, F Karray1, S Sayadi3, E Molina-Grima2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Microalgae are attracting much attention as a promising feedstock for renewable energy production, while simultaneously providing environmental benefits. So far, comparison studies for microalgae selection for this purpose were mainly based on data obtained from batch cultures, where the lipid content and the growth rate were the main selection parameters. The present study evaluates the performance of native microalgae strains in semi-continuous mode, considering the suitability of the algal-derived fatty acid composition and the saponifiable lipid productivity as selection criteria for microalgal fuel production. Evaluation of the photosynthetic performance and the robustness of the selected strain under outdoor conditions was conducted to assess its capability to grow and tolerate harsh environmental growth conditions.Entities:
Keywords: Biochemical composition; Biofuel; Chlorophyll fluorescence; Microalgae; Photosynthetic parameters; Productivity
Year: 2019 PMID: 31110560 PMCID: PMC6511200 DOI: 10.1186/s13068-019-1461-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biotechnol Biofuels ISSN: 1754-6834 Impact factor: 6.040
Sampling site description and characterization of isolated microalgae strains
| Algal class | Strain | Habitat | Sampling site | Average cell size | Accession number of sequenced regions: |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bacillariophyceae | Sea water | 36°51′0″ N11°6′0″ E | 18.10 × 4.30 | 18SrRNA:KX109777 | |
| Bacillariophyceae | Sea water | 36°49′0″ N 10°34′0″ E | 15.30 × 3.80 | 18SrRNA:KX109778 | |
| Chlorophyceae | Fresh water | 36°49′0″ N 10°34′0″ E | 7.70 × 4.30 | 18SrRNA:KT267272 | |
| Chlorodendrophyceae |
| Sea water | 37°0′6″ N 10°53′42″ E | 11.10 × 8.60 | 18SrRNA:KX109779 |
| Trebouxiophyceae | Sea water | 36°58′0″ N 11°4′60″ E | 4.10 × 3.90 | 18SrRNA:KX109776 |
Fig. 1a Dendrogram based on the 18S rRNA gene sequence. Bootstrap values are given at the nodes. The scale bar represents the substitution percentage. Thalassiosira concaviuscula was used as the outgroup. GenBank accession numbers follow the species name in parentheses. b Dendrogram based on the rbcL-3P sequence. Bootstrap values are given at the nodes. The scale bar represents the substitution percentage. Vaucheria repens was used as the outgroup. GenBank accession numbers follow the species name in parentheses
Fig. 2a Dendrogram based on the 18S rRNA gene sequence. Bootstrap values are given at the nodes. The scale bar represents the substitution percentage. Nitzschia communis was used as the outgroup. b Dendrogram based on the nuclear rDNA spacers’ sequence (ITS-1, 5.8 S gene and ITS-2). Bootstrap values are given at the nodes. The scale bar represents the substitution percentage. Stichococcus bacillaris was used as the outgroup. c Dendrogram based on the 18S rRNA gene sequence. Bootstrap values are given at the nodes. The scale bar represents the substitution percentage. Ankistrodesmus stipitatus was used as the outgroup. GenBank accession numbers follow the species name in parentheses
Fig. 3Changes in biomass concentration (a), biomass productivity (b) and photosynthetic efficiency (c) of Tetraselmis sp., Chlorella sp., Nitzschia sp. and Scenedesmus sp. once steady state of the cultures was achieved as a function of the dilution rate applied
Fig. 4Variations in protein (a) and lipid (b) contents, and lipid productivity (c) of Tetraselmis sp., Chlorella sp., Nitzschia sp. and Scenedesmus sp. at steady state, as a function of the dilution rate applied
Fig. 5Variations in fatty acids content (a) and saponifiable lipids productivity (b) of Tetraselmis sp., Chlorella sp., Nitzschia sp. and Scenedesmus sp. at steady state, as a function of the dilution rate applied
Summary of fatty acid compositional profiles at steady state for algal lipids from the different isolates cultivated in semi-continuous mode at different dilution rates
| D, 1/day | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.40 | 0.50 |
| 14:0 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 16:0 | – | – | – | 17.40 | 15.40 | 14.80 | – | 16.40 | 16.50 | 16.30 | 16.00 |
| 16:1n7 | 33.10 | 16.60 | 14.50 | 2.30 | – | – | 18.80 | 2.90 | 2.60 | 2.60 | 2.70 |
| 16:2n4 | 6.30 | 12.90 | 5.30 | 4.40 | 4.20 | 4.30 | 3.20 | 2.30 | – | 3.00 | – |
| 16:3n4 | 5.00 | 6.90 | 10.00 | 9.50 | 11.20 | 10.70 | 2.90 | – | – | – | – |
| 16:4n1 | – | – | 3.70 | 2.40 | – | – | 9.10 | 11.80 | 13.50 | 13.70 | 13.80 |
| 18:0 | 1.80 | – | 3.50 | – | 2.80 | 3.20 | – | – | 7.10 | 6.80 | – |
| 18:1n9 | 8.40 | – | 2.80 | 6.90 | 2.40 | 2.80 | 11.70 | 7.80 | – | – | 6.90 |
| 18:1n7 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 18:2n6 | – | – | – | 14.20 | 13.40 | 12.90 | – | 14.10 | 11.30 | 9.70 | 8.40 |
| 18:3n3 | 9.30 | 13.20 | – | 28.10 | 30.00 | 28.30 | 16.20 | 24.50 | 28.10 | 29.90 | 31.90 |
| 18:4n3 | 16.40 | 19.50 | – | – | – | – | 20.20 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.80 | – |
| 20:4n6 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| 20:1n9 | 3.00 | 3.00 | – | 2.20 | 3.20 | 3.20 | – | – | – | – | – |
| 22:5n3 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| SFA | 1.80 | – | 3.50 | 17.40 | 18.20 | 18.00 | – | 16.40 | 23.50 | 23.10 | 16.00 |
| MUFA | 44.50 | 19.60 | 19.40 | 11.40 | 5.60 | 3.20 | 30.50 | 10.70 | 2.60 | 2.60 | 9.60 |
| PUFA | 37.00 | 52.50 | 57.50 | 58.70 | 58.90 | 56.30 | 51.60 | 54.60 | 54.80 | 58.10 | 54.10 |
Data are mean value of two repetitions
SFA: Saturated fatty acids; MUFA: mono unsaturated fatty acids; PUFA: poly unsaturated fatty acids
Comparison of estimated biodiesel properties of algal lipids from the different isolates as a function of the dilution rate along with the US and European specifications (B100), and those of common vegetable oils
| D, 1/day | 0.08 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.38 | 0.45 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.30 | 0.40 | 0.50 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.30 |
| KV, at °C mm2/s | 4.20 | 4.00 | 3.90 | 4.10 | 4.20 | 4.20 | 3.90 | 4.10 | 4.10 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.80 | 4.80 | 4.70 |
| Specific gravity, Kg/L | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.88 | 0.87 | 0.87 | 0.87 |
| CP, °C | − 2.10 | − 4.60 | − 8.00 | − 2.90 | − 2.00 | − 1.00 | − 8.20 | − 2.90 | − 2.80 | − 4.00 | − 3.70 | 11.20 | 11.30 | 10.20 |
| CN, min | 51.80 | 50.60 | 48.90 | 51.40 | 51.90 | 52.40 | 48.80 | 51.40 | 51.50 | 50.90 | 51.00 | 58.50 | 58.50 | 58.00 |
| IV, g I2/100 g | 135.80 | 149.40 | 169.00 | 140.20 | 135.20 | 130.00 | 170.00 | 140.50 | 139.80 | 146.40 | 144.70 | 61.50 | 60.90 | 67.00 |
| HHV, MJ/Kg | 41.40 | 41.80 | 42.20 | 41.50 | 41.40 | 41.30 | 42.20 | 41.50 | 41.50 | 41.70 | 41.60 | 39.70 | 39.70 | 39.80 |
Data are mean value of two repetitions
KV: Kinematic viscosity; CP: cloud point; CN: cetane number; IV: iodine value; HHV: high heating value
Fig. 6Effect of temperature at 38 °C (a), at 10 °C (b) and high irradiance (1600 µmol/m2 s) (c) on different photosynthetic parameters of the WT1 Chlorella sp. strain as a function of time