Literature DB >> 31110353

Genomic prediction of maize yield across European environmental conditions.

Emilie J Millet1,2,1, Willem Kruijer1, Aude Coupel-Ledru2,3, Santiago Alvarez Prado2,4, Llorenç Cabrera-Bosquet2, Sébastien Lacube2, Alain Charcosset5, Claude Welcker2, Fred van Eeuwijk1, François Tardieu6.   

Abstract

The development of germplasm adapted to changing climate is required to ensure food security1,2. Genomic prediction is a powerful tool to evaluate many genotypes but performs poorly in contrasting environmental scenarios3-7 (genotype × environment interaction), in spite of promising results for flowering time8. New avenues are opened by the development of sensor networks for environmental characterization in thousands of fields9,10. We present a new strategy for germplasm evaluation under genotype × environment interaction. Yield was dissected in grain weight and number and genotype × environment interaction in these components was modeled as genotypic sensitivity to environmental drivers. Environments were characterized using genotype-specific indices computed from sensor data in each field and the progression of phenology calibrated for each genotype on a phenotyping platform. A whole-genome regression approach for the genotypic sensitivities led to accurate prediction of yield under genotype × environment interaction in a wide range of environmental scenarios, outperforming a benchmark approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31110353     DOI: 10.1038/s41588-019-0414-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Genet        ISSN: 1061-4036            Impact factor:   38.330


  39 in total

1.  Reconstruction of Networks with Direct and Indirect Genetic Effects.

Authors:  Willem Kruijer; Pariya Behrouzi; Daniela Bustos-Korts; María Xosé Rodríguez-Álvarez; Seyed Mahdi Mahmoudi; Brian Yandell; Ernst Wit; Fred A van Eeuwijk
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Leveraging probability concepts for cultivar recommendation in multi-environment trials.

Authors:  Kaio O G Dias; Jhonathan P R Dos Santos; Matheus D Krause; Hans-Peter Piepho; Lauro J M Guimarães; Maria M Pastina; Antonio A F Garcia
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 5.699

3.  Target-oriented prioritization: targeted selection strategy by integrating organismal and molecular traits through predictive analytics in breeding.

Authors:  Wenyu Yang; Tingting Guo; Jingyun Luo; Ruyang Zhang; Jiuran Zhao; Marilyn L Warburton; Yingjie Xiao; Jianbing Yan
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2022-03-15       Impact factor: 13.583

4.  Predicting phenotypes from genetic, environment, management, and historical data using CNNs.

Authors:  Jacob D Washburn; Emre Cimen; Guillaume Ramstein; Timothy Reeves; Patrick O'Briant; Greg McLean; Mark Cooper; Graeme Hammer; Edward S Buckler
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-08-27       Impact factor: 5.699

5.  Enviromics in breeding: applications and perspectives on envirotypic-assisted selection.

Authors:  Rafael T Resende; Hans-Peter Piepho; Guilherme J M Rosa; Orzenil B Silva-Junior; Fabyano F E Silva; Marcos Deon V de Resende; Dario Grattapaglia
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 6.  Crop breeding for a changing climate: integrating phenomics and genomics with bioinformatics.

Authors:  Jacob I Marsh; Haifei Hu; Mitchell Gill; Jacqueline Batley; David Edwards
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-04-14       Impact factor: 5.699

7.  The importance of dominance and genotype-by-environment interactions on grain yield variation in a large-scale public cooperative maize experiment.

Authors:  Anna R Rogers; Jeffrey C Dunne; Cinta Romay; Martin Bohn; Edward S Buckler; Ignacio A Ciampitti; Jode Edwards; David Ertl; Sherry Flint-Garcia; Michael A Gore; Christopher Graham; Candice N Hirsch; Elizabeth Hood; David C Hooker; Joseph Knoll; Elizabeth C Lee; Aaron Lorenz; Jonathan P Lynch; John McKay; Stephen P Moose; Seth C Murray; Rebecca Nelson; Torbert Rocheford; James C Schnable; Patrick S Schnable; Rajandeep Sekhon; Maninder Singh; Margaret Smith; Nathan Springer; Kurt Thelen; Peter Thomison; Addie Thompson; Mitch Tuinstra; Jason Wallace; Randall J Wisser; Wenwei Xu; A R Gilmour; Shawn M Kaeppler; Natalia De Leon; James B Holland
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 3.154

Review 8.  Improving Genomic Prediction Using High-Dimensional Secondary Phenotypes.

Authors:  Bader Arouisse; Tom P J M Theeuwen; Fred A van Eeuwijk; Willem Kruijer
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.599

Review 9.  Scaling up high-throughput phenotyping for abiotic stress selection in the field.

Authors:  Daniel T Smith; Andries B Potgieter; Scott C Chapman
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 5.699

10.  Unlocking big data doubled the accuracy in predicting the grain yield in hybrid wheat.

Authors:  Yusheng Zhao; Patrick Thorwarth; Yong Jiang; Norman Philipp; Albert W Schulthess; Mario Gils; Philipp H G Boeven; C Friedrich H Longin; Johannes Schacht; Erhard Ebmeyer; Viktor Korzun; Vilson Mirdita; Jost Dörnte; Ulrike Avenhaus; Ralf Horbach; Hilmar Cöster; Josef Holzapfel; Ludwig Ramgraber; Simon Kühnle; Pierrick Varenne; Anne Starke; Friederike Schürmann; Sebastian Beier; Uwe Scholz; Fang Liu; Renate H Schmidt; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 14.136

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.