Literature DB >> 31109755

Effect of Antibiotic-Impregnated Bone Cement in Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Hiba K Anis1, Nipun Sodhi1, Mhamad Faour2, Alison K Klika1, Michael A Mont1, Wael K Barsoum2, Carlos A Higuera2, Robert M Molloy1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of commercially available antibiotic-impregnated bone cement (AIBC) on (1) prosthetic joint infections (PJIs) and (2) surgical site infections (SSIs) after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA).
METHODS: A review of primary TKAs between 2014 and 2017 from an institutional database was conducted. This identified 12,541 cases which were separated into AIBC (n = 4337) and non-AIBC (8,164) cohorts. Medical records were reviewed for PJIs and SSIs (mean 2-year postoperative period). Infection rates between the cohorts were compared with univariate analyses followed by subanalysis of high risk patients (defined as having 2 or more of the following characteristics: >65 years, body mass index >40, or Charlson Comorbidity Index score >3). To control for confounders, multivariate analyses were performed with regression models adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities, year, operative times, and lengths of stay.
RESULTS: On univariate analysis, PJI rates were higher in the AIBC cohort (1.0%) compared to the non-AIBC cohort (0.5%, P < .001). Subanalysis of the high risk patients also showed that PJI rates were higher in the AIBC cohort (1.9% vs 0.6%, P < .01). After adjusting for potential confounders, no significant associations between PJIs and AIBC use were found (odds ratio 1.4, 95% confidence interval 0.9-2.3, P = .133). Similarly, no significant differences in SSI rates were observed between the AIBC (2.9%) and non-AIBC cohorts (2.4%, P = .060) and no significant associations between SSIs and AIBC were found with multivariate analysis (odds ratio 1.0, 95% confidence interval CI 0.8-1.3, P = .948).
CONCLUSION: This study found that there was no clinically or statistically significant decrease in infection rates with AIBC in primary TKAs.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  antibiotic cement; postoperative infection; prosthetic joint infection; surgical site infection; total knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31109755     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.04.033

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  4 in total

1.  "Recommendations for periprosthetic joint infections (PJI) prevention: the European Knee Associates (EKA)-International Committee American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons (AAHKS)-Arthroplasty Society in Asia (ASIA) survey of members".

Authors:  Pier Francesco Indelli; F Iannotti; A Ferretti; R Valtanen; P Prati; D Pérez Prieto; N P Kort; B Violante; N R Tandogan; A Schiavone Panni; G Pipino; M T Hirschmann
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-09-13       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  What's New in Musculoskeletal Infection.

Authors:  Thomas K Fehring; Keith A Fehring; Angela Hewlett; Carlos A Higuera; Jesse E Otero; Aaron J Tande
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 6.558

Review 3.  Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI): A Clinical Practice Protocol in High-Risk Patients.

Authors:  Ferdinando Iannotti; Paolo Prati; Andrea Fidanza; Raffaele Iorio; Andrea Ferretti; Daniel Pèrez Prieto; Nanne Kort; Bruno Violante; Gennaro Pipino; Alfredo Schiavone Panni; Michael Hirschmann; Marco Mugnaini; Pier Francesco Indelli
Journal:  Trop Med Infect Dis       Date:  2020-12-11

Review 4.  Antibiotic containing bone cement in prevention of hip and knee prosthetic joint infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sujeesh Sebastian; Yang Liu; Robin Christensen; Deepak Bushan Raina; Magnus Tägil; Lars Lidgren
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2020-05-08       Impact factor: 5.191

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.